Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
184,584 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Bistatic Delay-Doppler Sensing for 3D Target Localization in Distributed Wi-Fi Systems

Abstract

This paper investigates how bistatic delay information improves the observability and localization performance of 3D moving targets in distributed Wi-Fi sensing. Motivated by emerging IEEE 802.11bf WLAN sensing, we consider one transmitter, multiple distributed receivers, and a single target with unknown position and velocity. We compare Doppler-only sensing with delay-Doppler sensing, in which delay-capable receivers provide additional bistatic path-length information for target localization. We derive the Fisher information matrix (FIM) and the position equivalent FIM (EFIM) for both sensing formulations. The resulting observability analysis shows that Doppler-only localization generically requires six receivers, whereas delay-Doppler localization can become locally identifiable with three receivers under non-degenerate geometry. We further study mixed receiver architectures in which only a subset of receivers provides delay estimates. Simulations with Wi-Fi-like bandwidths confirm the transition and quantify the roles of bandwidth, Doppler noise, receiver geometry, and delay-capable receiver availability.

Related

  1. Model-Order-Adaptive Channel Estimation for AFDM Systems with Fractional Delay and Doppler
    Ruizhe Wang, Cunhua Pan, Hong Ren +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  2. On the Fundamental Limits of Bistatic ISAC Over Vector Channels
    Dongsheng Peng, Lei Yu, Ping Chen +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  3. GNN-Based Global CSI Reconstruction for Fronthaul-Limited Distributed MIMO Systems
    Haojin Li, Kaiqian Qu, Anbang Zhang +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  4. Anderson localization in periodic elastic systems with random perturbations
    Xin Feng, Peijun Li, Wei Wu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsCondensed matterarXiv
  5. Non-Uniform Activation Aided Distributed Generalized Spatial Modulation for DMIMO Systems
    Haojin Li, Chen Sun, Rang Su +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{hong2026bistatic,
  title = {{Bistatic Delay-Doppler Sensing for 3D Target Localization in Distributed Wi-Fi Systems}},
  author = {Kyungmin Hong and Moein Ahmadi and Thomas Stifter and Mounim A. El Yacoubi and Bhavani Shankar Mysore R},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.15641},
  eprint = {2610.15641},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15641},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Bistatic Delay-Doppler Sensing for 3D Target Localization in Distributed Wi-Fi Systems
AU  - Kyungmin Hong
AU  - Moein Ahmadi
AU  - Thomas Stifter
AU  - Mounim A. El Yacoubi
AU  - Bhavani Shankar Mysore R
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/11
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.15641
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15641
AB  - This paper investigates how bistatic delay information improves the observability and localization performance of 3D moving targets in distributed Wi-Fi sensing. Motivated by emerging IEEE 802.11bf WLAN sensing, we consider one transmitter, multiple distributed receivers, and a single target with unknown position and velocity. We compare Doppler-only sensing with delay-Doppler sensing, in which delay-capable receivers provide additional bistatic path-length information for target localization. We derive the Fisher information matrix (FIM) and the position equivalent FIM (EFIM) for both sensing formulations. The resulting observability analysis shows that Doppler-only localization generically requires six receivers, whereas delay-Doppler localization can become locally identifiable with three receivers under non-degenerate geometry. We further study mixed receiver architectures in which only a subset of receivers provides delay estimates. Simulations with Wi-Fi-like bandwidths confirm the transition and quantify the roles of bandwidth, Doppler noise, receiver geometry, and delay-capable receiver availability.
ER  -