Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,544 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery cases

Müllerian-type high-grade serous carcinoma presenting exclusively with pleural lesions and no detectable abdominopelvic primary tumor: a case report.

  1. 1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idai-dori, Yahaba, Shiwa, Iwate, 028-3695, Japan. [email protected].
  2. 2Department of Molecular Diagnostic Pathology, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan.
  3. 3Department of Thoracic Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idai-dori, Yahaba, Shiwa, Iwate, 028-3695, Japan.

Abstract

Background

Müllerian-type high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) most commonly originates from the fallopian tube, ovary, or peritoneum and usually presents with abdominopelvic disease. Thoracic presentation without a detectable abdominopelvic primary tumor is extremely rare and poses a diagnostic challenge.Case presentation

We report the case of a 60-year-old woman who was referred to our hospital after pleural thickening was detected during a routine medical checkup. Chest computed tomography (CT) revealed left pleural thickening with mild pleural effusion. Thoracoscopic pleural biopsy was performed. Histopathological examination demonstrated spindle-shaped cells with mild nuclear atypia, with scattered calcifications and osteocyte-like elements. Immunohistochemical staining showed positivity for PAX8, WT-1, AE1/AE3, CK7, p16, and p53, and negativity for calretinin, D2-40, TTF-1, and Napsin A, supporting a Müllerian-type HGSC. Diagnostic/staging laparoscopy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy revealed no macroscopic tumor or disseminated lesions. Both ovaries and fallopian tubes were carefully examined pathologically, with the fallopian tubes examined using the SEE-FIM protocol. No malignant lesion or serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) was identified. Peritoneal washing cytology was negative. p53 and Ki-67 immunohistochemistry of the tubo-ovarian specimens was not performed.Discussion

The absence of a detectable abdominopelvic primary tumor after radiological, laparoscopic, and pathological evaluation suggests an extremely rare thoracic presentation of Müllerian-type HGSC. Both ovaries and fallopian tubes were carefully examined pathologically, including examination of the fallopian tubes using the SEE-FIM protocol, and no malignant lesion or STIC was identified. Nevertheless, an occult microscopic Müllerian primary cannot be completely excluded, particularly because p53 and Ki-67 immunohistochemistry of the tubo-ovarian specimens was not performed. Primary pleural Müllerian carcinoma, EOPPC, and Müllerian-type HGSC of undetermined primary origin therefore remain possible classifications. Müllerian-type HGSC should be considered in the differential diagnosis of pleural tumors in women, even when no abdominopelvic primary tumor is identified. Comprehensive radiological, laparoscopic, and pathological evaluation is important for determining the most appropriate classification. In the absence of an identified primary site, classification should remain cautious, and EOPPC should be regarded as a possible interpretation rather than a definitive diagnosis.

Related

  1. MURCs (Mullerian duct, renal and cervico-thoracic somite dysplasia) association presenting with urinary incontinence secondary to an ectopic ureter☆☆☆
    Niveshni Maistry, Gary Peiser, Andrew Grieve
    Urology case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Late Recurrence of Gastric Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma Presenting as Pulmonary Metastasis 18 Years after Gastrectomy: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Daichi Setoguchi, Shinnosuke Takemoto, Kouki Yamashita +8
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineJ-STAGE
  3. Ampullary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Presenting with Clinically Confirmed Endogenous Hyperinsulinemic Hypoglycemia
    Mika Ito, Eiki Ishisaka, Yoshiro Kashii +7
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthJ-STAGE
  4. Li-Fraumeni syndrome presenting with early-onset eyelid sebaceous carcinoma
    Li Lyung Wang, Songji Choi, Hyunji Kim +2
    American Journal of Ophthalmology Case ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineDOAJEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  5. Aldosterone-producing adrenocortical carcinoma presenting with severe, rapidly progressive hypokalemia: a case report and literature review
    Yukino Okimoto, Akinori Takedomi, Tsuguka Matsuda +10
    Endocrine JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaJ-STAGE
BibTeX
@article{kaneko2026mülleriantype,
  title = {{Müllerian-type high-grade serous carcinoma presenting exclusively with pleural lesions and no detectable abdominopelvic primary tumor: a case report.}},
  author = {Yuka Kaneko and Naoki Yanagawa and Makoto Tomoyasu and Wataru Shigeeda and Ryuichi Yoshimura and Hironaga Kanno and Hidenobu Iwai and Ryotaro Endo and Hiroyuki Deguchi and Hajime Saito},
  journal = {General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery cases},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1186/s44215-026-00283-0},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907930},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Müllerian-type high-grade serous carcinoma presenting exclusively with pleural lesions and no detectable abdominopelvic primary tumor: a case report.
AU  - Yuka Kaneko
AU  - Naoki Yanagawa
AU  - Makoto Tomoyasu
AU  - Wataru Shigeeda
AU  - Ryuichi Yoshimura
AU  - Hironaga Kanno
AU  - Hidenobu Iwai
AU  - Ryotaro Endo
AU  - Hiroyuki Deguchi
AU  - Hajime Saito
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
JO  - General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery cases
DO  - 10.1186/s44215-026-00283-0
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907930
AB  - Background  Müllerian-type high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) most commonly originates from the fallopian tube, ovary, or peritoneum and usually presents with abdominopelvic disease. Thoracic presentation without a detectable abdominopelvic primary tumor is extremely rare and poses a diagnostic challenge.Case presentation  We report the case of a 60-year-old woman who was referred to our hospital after pleural thickening was detected during a routine medical checkup. Chest computed tomography (CT) revealed left pleural thickening with mild pleural effusion. Thoracoscopic pleural biopsy was performed. Histopathological examination demonstrated spindle-shaped cells with mild nuclear atypia, with scattered calcifications and osteocyte-like elements. Immunohistochemical staining showed positivity for PAX8, WT-1, AE1/AE3, CK7, p16, and p53, and negativity for calretinin, D2-40, TTF-1, and Napsin A, supporting a Müllerian-type HGSC. Diagnostic/staging laparoscopy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy revealed no macroscopic tumor or disseminated lesions. Both ovaries and fallopian tubes were carefully examined pathologically, with the fallopian tubes examined using the SEE-FIM protocol. No malignant lesion or serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) was identified. Peritoneal washing cytology was negative. p53 and Ki-67 immunohistochemistry of the tubo-ovarian specimens was not performed.Discussion  The absence of a detectable abdominopelvic primary tumor after radiological, laparoscopic, and pathological evaluation suggests an extremely rare thoracic presentation of Müllerian-type HGSC. Both ovaries and fallopian tubes were carefully examined pathologically, including examination of the fallopian tubes using the SEE-FIM protocol, and no malignant lesion or STIC was identified. Nevertheless, an occult microscopic Müllerian primary cannot be completely excluded, particularly because p53 and Ki-67 immunohistochemistry of the tubo-ovarian specimens was not performed. Primary pleural Müllerian carcinoma, EOPPC, and Müllerian-type HGSC of undetermined primary origin therefore remain possible classifications. Müllerian-type HGSC should be considered in the differential diagnosis of pleural tumors in women, even when no abdominopelvic primary tumor is identified. Comprehensive radiological, laparoscopic, and pathological evaluation is important for determining the most appropriate classification. In the absence of an identified primary site, classification should remain cautious, and EOPPC should be regarded as a possible interpretation rather than a definitive diagnosis.
SN  - 2731-6203
ER  -