Structuring decision-making for systemic climate-financial risk.
- 1University of New South Wales
Abstract
Physical climate risks are a source of vulnerability in financial systems, yet existing risk measurement approaches struggle to translate them into decision-relevant metrics, reflecting a mismatch between how climate risk evolves and how financial risk is assessed. Drawing on workshops and interviews with 35 finance and risk professionals (33 from a large financial institution, two from a global insurance broker), we identify six interacting risk domains through which physical climate risk cascades to credit loss, creating decision bottlenecks where routine practice breaks down. Integrating storylines and dynamic adaptive policy pathways, we develop a qualitative–analytical framework that allows decisions to proceed within these bottlenecks. Whereas scenario analysis and stress testing estimate losses under specified futures, the storylines developed here trace how risk reaches the portfolio through the responses of insurers, households and regulators and the institution itself. The pathways identify which signals to monitor and when to reconsider action, organising risk appetite as sequences of contingent actions. Because its effects lack historical precedent and a robust link to default, emerge gradually and often unseen across interacting domains, and rebound on the institution through the responses its own actions provoke, climate-financial risk is as much a problem of decision structuring and adaptive governance as of measurement.
Related
- Integrative analysis of climate change drivers using ISM DEMATEL approach for structural decision making
- Reforestation Policy under Carbon Taxation: Climate Efficacy, Biodiversity, and Macro-Financial Risks
- Effects of financial inclusion on household climate change vulnerability in Ghana
- Optimization of UV-C irradiation time for biologically treated saline wastewater using artificial neural networks and a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework
- Application of type I and II error analysis to support economic decision-making of using an immunomodulator feed additive
BibTeX
@article{fiedler2026structuring,
title = {{Structuring decision-making for systemic climate-financial risk.}},
author = {Tanya Fiedler and Monica Trezise and Andy J Pitman and Benjamin R. Newell},
journal = {Environmental Research Letters},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1088/1748-9326/aebcfc},
url = {https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aebcfc},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Structuring decision-making for systemic climate-financial risk.
AU - Tanya Fiedler
AU - Monica Trezise
AU - Andy J Pitman
AU - Benjamin R. Newell
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/03
JO - Environmental Research Letters
DO - 10.1088/1748-9326/aebcfc
UR - https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aebcfc
AB - Physical climate risks are a source of vulnerability in financial systems, yet existing risk measurement approaches struggle to translate them into decision-relevant metrics, reflecting a mismatch between how climate risk evolves and how financial risk is assessed. Drawing on workshops and interviews with 35 finance and risk professionals (33 from a large financial institution, two from a global insurance broker), we identify six interacting risk domains through which physical climate risk cascades to credit loss, creating decision bottlenecks where routine practice breaks down. Integrating storylines and dynamic adaptive policy pathways, we develop a qualitative–analytical framework that allows decisions to proceed within these bottlenecks. Whereas scenario analysis and stress testing estimate losses under specified futures, the storylines developed here trace how risk reaches the portfolio through the responses of insurers, households and regulators and the institution itself. The pathways identify which signals to monitor and when to reconsider action, organising risk appetite as sequences of contingent actions. Because its effects lack historical precedent and a robust link to default, emerge gradually and often unseen across interacting domains, and rebound on the institution through the responses its own actions provoke, climate-financial risk is as much a problem of decision structuring and adaptive governance as of measurement.
SN - 1748-9326
ER -