Why Sensors Fail in Biological Samples: Fouling, Blocking, Matrix Effects and Prevention Solutions
- 1Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics, AGH University of Krakow, Mickiewicza 30, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland
Abstract
Sensors and biosensors designed for biomarker detection in biological samples often suffer from performance loss caused by surface fouling, interface blocking, and matrix interference. Although these effects are frequently discussed separately, in real sensing systems they are strongly interconnected and they determine analytical reliability, especially in body fluids like serum, plasma, whole blood, sweat, and other complex media. This review provides a practical and mechanism-oriented overview of how these processes originate, how they differ, and how they ultimately lead to signal drift, reduced sensitivity, false-positive responses, and shortened sensor lifetime. We first discuss the molecular origins of interface failure, including protein adsorption, conditioning film formation, nonspecific binding, ionic strength effects, pH fluctuations, viscosity-related diffusion changes, and electroactive interferents. The impact of these phenomena is then compared across major sensing platforms, including electrochemical, potentiometric, optical, capacitive sensors, field-effect transistors and wearable biosensors. A central part of this review focuses on practical prevention strategies already employed in real biomarker sensing platforms. These include hydration-driven antifouling coatings, zwitterionic and hydrogel interfaces, post-immobilization blocking with bovine serum albumin, mercaptohexanol and ethanolamine, ionophore and membrane engineering in ion-selective electrodes, hydrophobic solid-contact layers for water-layer suppression, regeneration workflows, membrane and microfluidic pre-treatment, and AI-assisted drift correction. By combining advances in materials engineering, surface chemistry, sample handling, and algorithmic correction, this review highlights strategies to improve sensor stability in complex biological fluids. Overall, it offers a practical guide for developing next-generation low-fouling, drift-resistant, and self-correcting sensing systems for reliable biomarker analysis at the point of care.
Related
- Polyphenolic Composition and Multifunctional Biological Properties of Raspberry Leaves: Variation Among Cultivar-Specific Samples
- Fe2O3–MgO–CuO@MWCNT Nanocomposite for Highly Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of l -Cysteine at Low Potential in Biological Samples
- Recent Advances in the Enantiomeric Separation of Tropane Alkaloids by Liquid Chromatography: Analytical Strategies and Applications in Pharmaceutical, Biological, and Food Samples.
- Development of an aptamer-functionalized sorbent for the selective and specific extraction of lead from environmental and biological samples
- Drug–drug adsorption-based miniaturized solid phase extraction of amlodipine from biological samples before HPLC–PDA analysis
BibTeX
@article{lenar2026sensors,
title = {{Why Sensors Fail in Biological Samples: Fouling, Blocking, Matrix Effects and Prevention Solutions}},
author = {Nikola Lenar and Beata Paczosa‐Bator},
journal = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
doi = {10.3390/ijms27125176},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27125176},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Why Sensors Fail in Biological Samples: Fouling, Blocking, Matrix Effects and Prevention Solutions
AU - Nikola Lenar
AU - Beata Paczosa‐Bator
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/07
JO - International Journal of Molecular Sciences
DO - 10.3390/ijms27125176
UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27125176
AB - Sensors and biosensors designed for biomarker detection in biological samples often suffer from performance loss caused by surface fouling, interface blocking, and matrix interference. Although these effects are frequently discussed separately, in real sensing systems they are strongly interconnected and they determine analytical reliability, especially in body fluids like serum, plasma, whole blood, sweat, and other complex media. This review provides a practical and mechanism-oriented overview of how these processes originate, how they differ, and how they ultimately lead to signal drift, reduced sensitivity, false-positive responses, and shortened sensor lifetime. We first discuss the molecular origins of interface failure, including protein adsorption, conditioning film formation, nonspecific binding, ionic strength effects, pH fluctuations, viscosity-related diffusion changes, and electroactive interferents. The impact of these phenomena is then compared across major sensing platforms, including electrochemical, potentiometric, optical, capacitive sensors, field-effect transistors and wearable biosensors. A central part of this review focuses on practical prevention strategies already employed in real biomarker sensing platforms. These include hydration-driven antifouling coatings, zwitterionic and hydrogel interfaces, post-immobilization blocking with bovine serum albumin, mercaptohexanol and ethanolamine, ionophore and membrane engineering in ion-selective electrodes, hydrophobic solid-contact layers for water-layer suppression, regeneration workflows, membrane and microfluidic pre-treatment, and AI-assisted drift correction. By combining advances in materials engineering, surface chemistry, sample handling, and algorithmic correction, this review highlights strategies to improve sensor stability in complex biological fluids. Overall, it offers a practical guide for developing next-generation low-fouling, drift-resistant, and self-correcting sensing systems for reliable biomarker analysis at the point of care.
SN - 1422-0067
SN - 1661-6596
ER -