Spectral Sign Implication for Quantum Logic

@misc{tokuo2026spectral,
  title = {{Spectral Sign Implication for Quantum Logic}},
  author = {Kenji Tokuo},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.08099},
  eprint = {2609.08099},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08099},
}

TY  - UNPB
TI  - Spectral Sign Implication for Quantum Logic
AU  - Kenji Tokuo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/08
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.08099
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08099
AB  - We study the spectral sign implication for quantum logic, defined by the nonnegative spectral projection of the operator obtained by subtracting the antecedent projection from the consequent projection. The construction agrees with classical material implication on commuting projections and compares arbitrary pairs of projections through the spectral structure of their difference. It satisfies Hardegree's four minimal implicative conditions, his law of contraposition, and a falsity condition. It differs from the standard polynomial implications in that its value need not belong to the ortholattice generated by its arguments. Within a uniform class of Borel constructions for pairs of projections, the operations satisfying entailment, contraposition, and the falsity condition correspond exactly to measurable choices of spectral branch. In the continuous subclass, these three conditions determine the spectral sign implication uniquely. In finite dimensions, the operation is also the largest among the acceptance projections of optimal projective tests for Helstrom discrimination between subspace states with priors proportional to rank. These results connect quantum implication with the operator theory of two projections and binary quantum discrimination.
ER  -