Beyond XAI: a claim-specific translation matrix for cancer biomarkers and therapeutic targets
4 affiliations
- 1Celvia CC AS
- 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu
- 3Laboratory of Precision and Nanomedicine, Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, University of Tartu
- 4Nalam Biosciences OÜ
Abstract
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) is increasingly used in molecular and multimodal oncology to identify features that influence machine-learning predictions. A model-important feature may subsequently be described as a biomarker, mechanistic driver or therapeutic target, although these labels represent distinct scientific claims requiring different evidence. We propose the XAI Biomarker Translation Matrix, a claim-specific conceptual framework separating explanation evidence (E), biological evidence (B) and translational evidence (T). A claim gate routes XAI-prioritised candidates into three validation pathways: diagnostic, prognostic or treatment-predictive biomarkers; mechanistic therapeutic targets; and tumour-selective delivery targets. The explanation dimension is XAI-specific and addresses whether attribution is defined, stable, faithful and reproducible, whereas the biological and translational dimensions connect the attributed feature to claim-appropriate evidence. Claim-evidence concordance requires terminology to remain no stronger than the evidence demonstrated for the intended use, and falsification-first translation asks investigators to prespecify the observation most capable of challenging the proposed interpretation. Complementing established AI-reporting, biomarker-validation and target-assessment standards, the matrix adds an XAI-specific explanation-evidence layer and an explicit claim gate linking attribution to claim-specific evidence and terminology: XAI prioritises candidates; the claim determines the validation pathway.
Related
- Metastasis Pattern-Specific Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Gastric Cancer: From Surgical Specimens to Clinical Translation.
- Skin-Derived Non-Coding RNAs as Potential Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets
- Circulating Biomarkers with Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Risk Assessment and Therapeutic Monitoring: Evidence, Limitations, and Translation
- Growth Hormone-Related Gene Signatures Reveal Diagnostic Biomarkers, Immune Landscapes, and Potential Therapeutic Targets in Sepsis Through WGCNA and Machine Learning Analyses.
- Red Blood Cells Beyond Oxygen Transport: Dynamic Regulators, Disease Biomarkers and Therapeutic Platforms—A Narrative Review
BibTeX
@article{modhukur2026beyond,
title = {{Beyond XAI: a claim-specific translation matrix for cancer biomarkers and therapeutic targets}},
author = {Vijayachitra Modhukur and Naisarg Patel and Prakash Lingasamy},
journal = {Frontiers in Oncology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1994216},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1994216/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Beyond XAI: a claim-specific translation matrix for cancer biomarkers and therapeutic targets
AU - Vijayachitra Modhukur
AU - Naisarg Patel
AU - Prakash Lingasamy
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/29
JO - Frontiers in Oncology
DO - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1994216
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1994216/full
AB - Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) is increasingly used in molecular and multimodal oncology to identify features that influence machine-learning predictions. A model-important feature may subsequently be described as a biomarker, mechanistic driver or therapeutic target, although these labels represent distinct scientific claims requiring different evidence. We propose the XAI Biomarker Translation Matrix, a claim-specific conceptual framework separating explanation evidence (E), biological evidence (B) and translational evidence (T). A claim gate routes XAI-prioritised candidates into three validation pathways: diagnostic, prognostic or treatment-predictive biomarkers; mechanistic therapeutic targets; and tumour-selective delivery targets. The explanation dimension is XAI-specific and addresses whether attribution is defined, stable, faithful and reproducible, whereas the biological and translational dimensions connect the attributed feature to claim-appropriate evidence. Claim-evidence concordance requires terminology to remain no stronger than the evidence demonstrated for the intended use, and falsification-first translation asks investigators to prespecify the observation most capable of challenging the proposed interpretation. Complementing established AI-reporting, biomarker-validation and target-assessment standards, the matrix adds an XAI-specific explanation-evidence layer and an explicit claim gate linking attribution to claim-specific evidence and terminology: XAI prioritises candidates; the claim determines the validation pathway.
SN - 2234-943X
ER -