Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYAnnals of gastroenterological surgery

Metastasis Pattern-Specific Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Gastric Cancer: From Surgical Specimens to Clinical Translation.

  1. 1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan.

Abstract

Metastasis has traditionally been investigated and treated as a single manifestation of gastric cancer progression. Although this approach has generated important biological insights and effective systemic therapies, it may obscure route-dependent vulnerabilities. Lymphatic, peritoneal, and hematogenous metastases require cancer cells to traverse different anatomical routes, overcome distinct barriers, and adapt to different microenvironments. This review therefore distinguishes broadly metastasis-associated mechanisms from pattern-associated candidates and reserves pattern-specific designation for evidence based on direct route comparison, pattern prediction, or route-selective functional experiments. We examine representative molecular determinants and link their identification in surgical specimens to functional validation, biomarker development, and drug discovery. Evidence is most mature for peritoneal dissemination, whereas lymph-node-specific determinants remain less developed. The SYT13/ASO-4733 program is presented as an illustrative translational case: Intraperitoneal ASO-4733 has entered first-in-human Phase I evaluation, but clinical efficacy has not been established. For any candidate, clinical utility requires independent validation, incremental value beyond established clinicopathological factors, and a defined effect on decision-making. Rigorously collected, rapidly processed, and clinically annotated surgical biospecimens remain indispensable. Reframing gastric cancer metastasis by route may expand opportunities for precise risk prediction, rational delivery, and biologically coherent early-phase trials.

Related

  1. Beyond XAI: a claim-specific translation matrix for cancer biomarkers and therapeutic targets
    Vijayachitra Modhukur, Naisarg Patel, Prakash Lingasamy
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0OncologyCrossref
  2. Circulating Biomarkers with Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Risk Assessment and Therapeutic Monitoring: Evidence, Limitations, and Translation
    Wenyuan Wei, Rui Zhang, Zhiying Zhang
    Therapeutics and Clinical Risk ManagementPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textOncologyPMC
  3. Stemness-Associated Biomarkers in Breast Cancer Liver Metastasis: Hepatic Adaptation, Prognostic Relevance, and Monitoring
    Bin Hu, Jing Hou, Shihang Hu
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. AI-driven multi-omics biomarkers in precision breast cancer therapeutics: from discovery to clinical translation
    Dimitrios Stylianakis, Rodrigo Sánchez-Bayona, Nerina Denaro +1
    Frontiers in pharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
  5. Fluorescence imaging enables multiscale profiling of therapeutic antibody delivery across entire surgical specimens
    Hidenori Tanaka, Mabrooka Kazi, Carleigh R. Burns +7
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{kanda2026metastasis,
  title = {{Metastasis Pattern-Specific Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Gastric Cancer: From Surgical Specimens to Clinical Translation.}},
  author = {Mitsuro Kanda},
  journal = {Annals of gastroenterological surgery},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/ags3.70302},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948023},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Metastasis Pattern-Specific Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Gastric Cancer: From Surgical Specimens to Clinical Translation.
AU  - Mitsuro Kanda
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
JO  - Annals of gastroenterological surgery
DO  - 10.1002/ags3.70302
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948023
AB  - Metastasis has traditionally been investigated and treated as a single manifestation of gastric cancer progression. Although this approach has generated important biological insights and effective systemic therapies, it may obscure route-dependent vulnerabilities. Lymphatic, peritoneal, and hematogenous metastases require cancer cells to traverse different anatomical routes, overcome distinct barriers, and adapt to different microenvironments. This review therefore distinguishes broadly metastasis-associated mechanisms from pattern-associated candidates and reserves pattern-specific designation for evidence based on direct route comparison, pattern prediction, or route-selective functional experiments. We examine representative molecular determinants and link their identification in surgical specimens to functional validation, biomarker development, and drug discovery. Evidence is most mature for peritoneal dissemination, whereas lymph-node-specific determinants remain less developed. The SYT13/ASO-4733 program is presented as an illustrative translational case: Intraperitoneal ASO-4733 has entered first-in-human Phase I evaluation, but clinical efficacy has not been established. For any candidate, clinical utility requires independent validation, incremental value beyond established clinicopathological factors, and a defined effect on decision-making. Rigorously collected, rapidly processed, and clinically annotated surgical biospecimens remain indispensable. Reframing gastric cancer metastasis by route may expand opportunities for precise risk prediction, rational delivery, and biologically coherent early-phase trials.
SN  - 2475-0328
ER  -