Cognitive and affective networks in patients referred for cognitive screening: latent profiles, bridge nodes, and exploratory directional structures
- 1The Affiliated Nanhua Hospital, Sleep Medicine Center, Department of Neurology, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China
- 2School of Nursing, The Affiliated Nanhua Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China
Abstract
Background: Lower cognitive performance and anxiety and depression frequently co-occur in patients referred for cognitive screening, but how the two domains are connected, and whether this differs across patient subgroups, is unclear. Prior network studies used abbreviated cognitive tools, self-report affective measures, and undirected models.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study of 548 patients referred for cognitive screening at a Chinese general hospital, 16 network nodes were derived from the seven Montreal Cognitive Assessment domains, the two Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale factors, and the seven factors of the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Gaussian graphical models with bridge expected influence were estimated for the overall sample and for each profile identified by latent profile analysis. Bayesian directed acyclic graphs with bootstrap resampling explored the direction of cross-domain associations in the overall sample and within each profile. The network comparison test compared profiles.
Results: Cognitive and affective nodes formed two nearly completely separated communities (normalized mutual information = 1.000), connected mainly through language and anxiety/somatization, the two primary bridge nodes. Latent profile analysis identified three profiles: low cognitive performance ( n = 114), high affective burden ( n = 167), and low affective burden ( n = 267). Few cross-domain edges were stable under bootstrap (five in the overall sample; six, three, and none in the profiles), and direction certainty was close to 0.50 for most. The two edges with the highest direction certainty, orientation to retardation and language to anxiety/somatization, ran from cognitive to affective nodes where their direction was determined, before and after adjustment for age and education. The profiles differed in which cross-domain edges appeared, not in the direction of any edge. Exploratory network comparison indicated differences between the high and low affective burden profiles in global strength and structure, with no edge-level difference surviving correction for multiple comparisons.
Conclusion: Cognitive and affective domains formed largely separate communities linked by a narrow bridge, and the sample comprised three distinct profiles. The directional structures were exploratory. The findings support stratified assessment in cognitive screening settings; they do not establish a causal direction or a treatment sequence, which require longitudinal and interventional studies.
Related
- Cognitive-Affective Factors Associated with Psychological Distress in Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Structural Equation Modelling Study
- Healthcare access for refugees in Germany: insights from stakeholders using cognitive affective maps
- Cognitive Control Neural Correlates of Negative Affective in Psychosis Spectrum Disorders: A Laboratory and Ecological Momentary Assessment Study
- Remote Online-Based Application of the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale.
- Cognitive-Affective Dimension After Virological Cure of Hepatitis C Virus Infection: WBSI Dynamics, Liver Status, and the Role of Comorbidities.
BibTeX
@article{wang2026cognitive,
title = {{Cognitive and affective networks in patients referred for cognitive screening: latent profiles, bridge nodes, and exploratory directional structures}},
author = {Yuting Wang and Yanqing Xie and Ling Yuan and Yanling Liu and Jinmei Zhang and Bixia Zhao and Fengying Zhang},
journal = {Frontiers in Psychiatry},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1887588},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1887588/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Cognitive and affective networks in patients referred for cognitive screening: latent profiles, bridge nodes, and exploratory directional structures
AU - Yuting Wang
AU - Yanqing Xie
AU - Ling Yuan
AU - Yanling Liu
AU - Jinmei Zhang
AU - Bixia Zhao
AU - Fengying Zhang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/08
JO - Frontiers in Psychiatry
DO - 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1887588
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1887588/full
AB - Background: Lower cognitive performance and anxiety and depression frequently co-occur in patients referred for cognitive screening, but how the two domains are connected, and whether this differs across patient subgroups, is unclear. Prior network studies used abbreviated cognitive tools, self-report affective measures, and undirected models. Methods: In this cross-sectional study of 548 patients referred for cognitive screening at a Chinese general hospital, 16 network nodes were derived from the seven Montreal Cognitive Assessment domains, the two Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale factors, and the seven factors of the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Gaussian graphical models with bridge expected influence were estimated for the overall sample and for each profile identified by latent profile analysis. Bayesian directed acyclic graphs with bootstrap resampling explored the direction of cross-domain associations in the overall sample and within each profile. The network comparison test compared profiles. Results: Cognitive and affective nodes formed two nearly completely separated communities (normalized mutual information = 1.000), connected mainly through language and anxiety/somatization, the two primary bridge nodes. Latent profile analysis identified three profiles: low cognitive performance ( n = 114), high affective burden ( n = 167), and low affective burden ( n = 267). Few cross-domain edges were stable under bootstrap (five in the overall sample; six, three, and none in the profiles), and direction certainty was close to 0.50 for most. The two edges with the highest direction certainty, orientation to retardation and language to anxiety/somatization, ran from cognitive to affective nodes where their direction was determined, before and after adjustment for age and education. The profiles differed in which cross-domain edges appeared, not in the direction of any edge. Exploratory network comparison indicated differences between the high and low affective burden profiles in global strength and structure, with no edge-level difference surviving correction for multiple comparisons. Conclusion: Cognitive and affective domains formed largely separate communities linked by a narrow bridge, and the sample comprised three distinct profiles. The directional structures were exploratory. The findings support stratified assessment in cognitive screening settings; they do not establish a causal direction or a treatment sequence, which require longitudinal and interventional studies.
SN - 1664-0640
ER -