A prospective comparative study of outcomes between zero-profile 3D-printed interbody cages and plate-augmented cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
- 1Department of Orthopedics, Luohe Central Hospital
- 2Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital
- 3Clinical College of Henan Northern Medical College
Abstract
To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes between a zero-profile 3D-printed microporous titanium alloy (3D-ZP) cage and a traditional polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with an anterior plate in patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). A prospective, open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted from January 2022 to January 2024. Patients diagnosed with single-level CSM were randomized to receive either a 3D-ZP cage or a PEEK cage with an anterior plate. The primary outcome was prosthesis subsidence rate. Secondary outcomes included operative time, incidence of dysphagia, visual analog scale (VAS) for neck pain, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), segmental Cobb angle, and fusion status. Follow-ups were conducted at 1 week, 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. A total of 113 patients completed the 24-month follow-up (3D-ZP group: n = 52, PEEK group: n = 61). The 3D-ZP group demonstrated a significantly lower prosthesis subsidence rate compared to the PEEK group (9.6% vs. 27.9%; RR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.14–0.87, P = 0.015). Operative time was shorter in the 3D-ZP group (65.63 ± 11.42 vs. 78.64 ± 14.81 min; MD=–13.00, 95% CI − 18.00 to − 8.01, P < 0.001). The incidence of dysphagia was also lower in the 3D-ZP group at both 1-week (13.5% vs. 45.9%, RR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.14–0.62, P < 0.001) and 24-month follow-ups (1.9% vs. 21.3%; RR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.01–0.67, P = 0.002). No significant differences were observed in JOA improvement rate or fusion rate between the two groups. Radiographically, the 3D-ZP group maintained significantly greater disc space height and segmental lordosis at 24 months. In single-level ACDF for CSM, the zero-profile 3D-printed titanium cage offers advantages over the traditional PEEK-and-plate construct, including shorter operative time, reduced incidence of dysphagia, and lower prosthesis subsidence rate, while achieving comparable neurological recovery and fusion outcomes.
Related
- Comparative analysis of three-year outcomes of different interbody fusion approaches for grade I-II lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis
- Short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthroscopic-assisted uni-portal spinal surgery discectomy with versus without ligamentum flavum preservation: a retrospective comparative cohort study
- Mid-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of augmented microfracture with decellularized particulated costal allocartilage for knee cartilage defects: four-year prospective case series
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction With Lateral Meniscal Repair With and Without Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: A Prospective Comparative Study of Functional and Rotational Outcomes
- Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Total Disc Replacement with a Viscoelastic Prosthesis for Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease in Young Adults: A Comparative Retrospective Cohort Study
BibTeX
@article{li2026prospective,
title = {{A prospective comparative study of outcomes between zero-profile 3D-printed interbody cages and plate-augmented cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion}},
author = {Yuwei Li and Xiuzhi Li and Bowen Li and Wei Cui and Yan He and Haijiao Wang},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-63918-w},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-63918-w},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - A prospective comparative study of outcomes between zero-profile 3D-printed interbody cages and plate-augmented cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
AU - Yuwei Li
AU - Xiuzhi Li
AU - Bowen Li
AU - Wei Cui
AU - Yan He
AU - Haijiao Wang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - Scientific Reports
DO - 10.1038/s41598-026-63918-w
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-63918-w
AB - To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes between a zero-profile 3D-printed microporous titanium alloy (3D-ZP) cage and a traditional polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with an anterior plate in patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). A prospective, open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted from January 2022 to January 2024. Patients diagnosed with single-level CSM were randomized to receive either a 3D-ZP cage or a PEEK cage with an anterior plate. The primary outcome was prosthesis subsidence rate. Secondary outcomes included operative time, incidence of dysphagia, visual analog scale (VAS) for neck pain, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), segmental Cobb angle, and fusion status. Follow-ups were conducted at 1 week, 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. A total of 113 patients completed the 24-month follow-up (3D-ZP group: n = 52, PEEK group: n = 61). The 3D-ZP group demonstrated a significantly lower prosthesis subsidence rate compared to the PEEK group (9.6% vs. 27.9%; RR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.14–0.87, P = 0.015). Operative time was shorter in the 3D-ZP group (65.63 ± 11.42 vs. 78.64 ± 14.81 min; MD=–13.00, 95% CI − 18.00 to − 8.01, P < 0.001). The incidence of dysphagia was also lower in the 3D-ZP group at both 1-week (13.5% vs. 45.9%, RR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.14–0.62, P < 0.001) and 24-month follow-ups (1.9% vs. 21.3%; RR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.01–0.67, P = 0.002). No significant differences were observed in JOA improvement rate or fusion rate between the two groups. Radiographically, the 3D-ZP group maintained significantly greater disc space height and segmental lordosis at 24 months. In single-level ACDF for CSM, the zero-profile 3D-printed titanium cage offers advantages over the traditional PEEK-and-plate construct, including shorter operative time, reduced incidence of dysphagia, and lower prosthesis subsidence rate, while achieving comparable neurological recovery and fusion outcomes.
SN - 2045-2322
ER -