Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
220,411 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Europace

Long-term outcomes of intermuscular versus subcutaneous S-ICD implantation: extended follow-up of a propensity-matched multicentre analysis

  • Giovanni Luca Botto
  • Matteo Ziacchi
  • Gerardo Nigro
  • Antonio Dello Russo
  • Pietro Francia
  • Stefano Viani
  • Federico Migliore
  • Paolo De Filippo
  • Luca Ottaviano
  • Alessandro Vicentini
  • Maria Carla Casale
  • Mariolina Lovecchio
2 more authors
  • Sergio Valsecchi
  • Luca Checchi
Read full textPDFDOICite

Abstract

Graphical Abstract: Graphical AbstractGraphical summary comparing intermuscular and subcutaneous S-ICD generator placement. Device-related complications were lower with intermuscular placement at 1 year (1.0% vs 4.6%) and at 8 years (4.9% vs 11.7%), supporting an improved long-term safety profile with the intermuscular technique.

Related

  1. Health Economic Outcomes of Subacromial Balloon Spacer Implantation Across Surgical Care Pathways: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of German Statutory Insurance Claims
    Marc Harms, Christoph Pross, Harald Kuhlmann +3
    Journal of health economics and outcomes researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  2. Ultrasound-guided peripheral regional anesthesia vs local infiltration anesthesia for cardiac device implantation: A propensity score–matched prospective observational cohort study
    Riyong Zhou, Ziyi Ni, Yaoxue Zang +8
    Heart rhythm O2Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  3. Intermuscular Posterolateral Minimally Invasive Open Approach Revisited: Spectrum of Applications and Stabilization Outcomes.
    Ajay Krishnan, Bharatkumar R Dave, Amritesh Singh +9
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textInfectious diseaseEurope PMCPMC
  4. TricValve System Implantation in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: A Multicentre Observational Study
    Kira Osipenko, Iuliana Coti, Paul Werner +26
    European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicinePMC
  5. Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with obesity: propensity score-matched multicentre study
    Valentina Valle, Tiziana Marchese, Benedetto Ielpo +77
    BJS OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyPMC

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{botto2026longterm,
  title = {{Long-term outcomes of intermuscular versus subcutaneous S-ICD implantation: extended follow-up of a propensity-matched multicentre analysis}},
  author = {Giovanni Luca Botto and Matteo Ziacchi and Gerardo Nigro and Antonio Dello Russo and Pietro Francia and Stefano Viani and Federico Migliore and Paolo De Filippo and Luca Ottaviano and Alessandro Vicentini and Maria Carla Casale and Mariolina Lovecchio and Sergio Valsecchi and Luca Checchi},
  journal = {Europace},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1093/europace/euag294},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euag294},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Long-term outcomes of intermuscular versus subcutaneous S-ICD implantation: extended follow-up of a propensity-matched multicentre analysis
AU  - Giovanni Luca Botto
AU  - Matteo Ziacchi
AU  - Gerardo Nigro
AU  - Antonio Dello Russo
AU  - Pietro Francia
AU  - Stefano Viani
AU  - Federico Migliore
AU  - Paolo De Filippo
AU  - Luca Ottaviano
AU  - Alessandro Vicentini
AU  - Maria Carla Casale
AU  - Mariolina Lovecchio
AU  - Sergio Valsecchi
AU  - Luca Checchi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/10
JO  - Europace
DO  - 10.1093/europace/euag294
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euag294
AB  - Graphical Abstract: Graphical AbstractGraphical summary comparing intermuscular and subcutaneous S-ICD generator placement. Device-related complications were lower with intermuscular placement at 1 year (1.0% vs 4.6%) and at 8 years (4.9% vs 11.7%), supporting an improved long-term safety profile with the intermuscular technique.
SN  - 1099-5129
SN  - 1532-2092
ER  -