Clinical Outcomes of Surgical-Orthodontic Management of Impacted Mandibular Canines: A Systematic Review.
- 1Department of Surgical Sciences, Postgraduate School in Orthodontics, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy.
- 2Orthodontics Division, Instituto Asturiano de Odontología, Universidad de Oviedo, 33006 Oviedo, Spain.
Abstract
Background: Impaction of mandibular canines is an uncommon clinical condition, and transmigration represents a severe positional variant within this spectrum. In contrast to maxillary canine impaction, the management of impacted mandibular canines remains less standardized and largely experience-based. This systematic review aimed to critically evaluate the clinical outcomes of surgical exposure followed by orthodontic traction in impacted mandibular canines. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across five electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library) up to February 2026. A total of 1512 records were identified; after duplicate removal, 1307 studies underwent title and abstract screening. Fifteen full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and four retrospective analytical studies met the predefined inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was successful orthodontic alignment. Secondary outcomes included treatment duration and reported complications. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I, and certainty of evidence was evaluated according to the GRADE approach. Results: Success rates ranged from 57% to 100% across studies. Overall, 31/42 canines (73.8%) were reported as successfully aligned; however, heterogeneity in case selection, outcome definitions, and reporting precluded quantitative synthesis. In most studies, success was defined primarily as positional alignment within the dental arch, with limited or absent assessment of periodontal status, pulp vitality, functional integration, or long-term stability. All included studies were judged to have a serious overall risk of bias. According to GRADE, the certainty of evidence for all evaluated outcomes was very low. Conclusions: Surgical exposure followed by orthodontic traction may represent a feasible option in carefully selected cases of impacted mandibular canines, particularly in younger patients and in the absence of severe displacement. However, given the serious risk of bias, small cumulative sample size, and very low certainty of evidence, these estimates must be interpreted with extreme caution. Unlike maxillary canine impaction, the current evidence base does not support protocol-driven management for mandibular cases, and clinical decision-making remains primarily individualized.
Related
- Clinical Outcomes and Patient-Reported Satisfaction with Functional Orthodontic Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Process Fractures
- Digital, Mobile and Artificial Intelligence‐Supported Interventions for Pressure Injury Prevention and Management: A Systematic Review of Clinical, Workflow and Implementation Outcomes
- Functional Orthodontic Rehabilitation and Craniofacial Growth in Pediatric Mandibular Condylar Fractures: A Narrative Review
- Clinical outcomes of the crown separation–dislocation–re-segmentation technique for high-risk impacted mandibular third molar extraction: a single-center retrospective cohort study
- Additively Manufactured Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: RCT Part 1 - Clinical and Peri-Implant Outcomes.
BibTeX
@article{stramandinoli2026clinical,
title = {{Clinical Outcomes of Surgical-Orthodontic Management of Impacted Mandibular Canines: A Systematic Review.}},
author = {Francesca Stramandinoli and Silvia Mura and Maurizio Ledda and Benedetta Salis and Beatrice Tandurella and Nerea Frances Garcia and Teresa Cobo and Alessio Verdecchia and Enrico Spinas},
journal = {Dentistry journal},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/dj14100632},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930398},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Clinical Outcomes of Surgical-Orthodontic Management of Impacted Mandibular Canines: A Systematic Review.
AU - Francesca Stramandinoli
AU - Silvia Mura
AU - Maurizio Ledda
AU - Benedetta Salis
AU - Beatrice Tandurella
AU - Nerea Frances Garcia
AU - Teresa Cobo
AU - Alessio Verdecchia
AU - Enrico Spinas
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/02
JO - Dentistry journal
DO - 10.3390/dj14100632
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930398
AB - Background: Impaction of mandibular canines is an uncommon clinical condition, and transmigration represents a severe positional variant within this spectrum. In contrast to maxillary canine impaction, the management of impacted mandibular canines remains less standardized and largely experience-based. This systematic review aimed to critically evaluate the clinical outcomes of surgical exposure followed by orthodontic traction in impacted mandibular canines. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across five electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library) up to February 2026. A total of 1512 records were identified; after duplicate removal, 1307 studies underwent title and abstract screening. Fifteen full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and four retrospective analytical studies met the predefined inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was successful orthodontic alignment. Secondary outcomes included treatment duration and reported complications. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I, and certainty of evidence was evaluated according to the GRADE approach. Results: Success rates ranged from 57% to 100% across studies. Overall, 31/42 canines (73.8%) were reported as successfully aligned; however, heterogeneity in case selection, outcome definitions, and reporting precluded quantitative synthesis. In most studies, success was defined primarily as positional alignment within the dental arch, with limited or absent assessment of periodontal status, pulp vitality, functional integration, or long-term stability. All included studies were judged to have a serious overall risk of bias. According to GRADE, the certainty of evidence for all evaluated outcomes was very low. Conclusions: Surgical exposure followed by orthodontic traction may represent a feasible option in carefully selected cases of impacted mandibular canines, particularly in younger patients and in the absence of severe displacement. However, given the serious risk of bias, small cumulative sample size, and very low certainty of evidence, these estimates must be interpreted with extreme caution. Unlike maxillary canine impaction, the current evidence base does not support protocol-driven management for mandibular cases, and clinical decision-making remains primarily individualized.
SN - 2304-6767
ER -