Postnatal Hypertension Management and Discharge Documentation: A Retrospective Clinical Audit at a UK University Hospital.
- 1Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Princess Royal University Hospital, London, GBR.
- 2Medical Education, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, GBR.
- 3Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Abstract
Background Postnatal hypertension requires timely blood pressure surveillance, treatment review, safety netting, and communication between maternity and community services. This audit assessed postnatal hypertension care and discharge documentation against local Trust standards at Princess Royal University Hospital. Methods A retrospective case-note audit included women with postnatal hypertension who delivered between April and September 2025. For audit eligibility, postnatal hypertension was defined as a pregnancy-related or chronic hypertensive disorder identified through prespecified Epic diagnosis filters and requiring postnatal surveillance. The clinical blood pressure threshold used for the audit was systolic blood pressure of at least 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure of at least 90 mmHg from birth through six weeks postpartum. Of 150 identified notes, 148 were included after exclusion of one pre-viable birth before 24+0 weeks and one immediate post-delivery transfer to another Trust. Statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.3.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Exploratory comparisons across pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and chronic hypertension/superimposed pre-eclampsia used Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square statistics with Monte Carlo p-values for categorical variables. Results Median maternal age was 34.0 years (IQR 30.0-37.0); 76/148 women (51.4%) had pregnancy-induced hypertension, 50/148 (33.8%) had pre-eclampsia, and 22/148 (14.9%) had chronic hypertension or superimposed pre-eclampsia. A valid discharge blood pressure was recorded in 146/148 records (98.6%); 118/146 (80.8%) were below 140/90 mmHg. Blood-pressure parameter plans, two-week general-practitioner review, and clear discharge communication were documented in 27/148 (18.2%), 34/147 (23.1%), and 16/148 (10.8%) records, respectively. Documentation of a blood pressure parameter plan (Pearson chi-square=8.551, p=0.014) and clear discharge communication (Pearson chi-square=8.349, p=0.013) differed across hypertensive disorder groups. Any postnatal antihypertensive was documented in 109/148 records (73.6%); medication documentation differed across groups (Pearson chi-square=12.669, p=0.001). Community re-referral for raised blood pressure occurred in 12/148 records (8.1%); any documented readmission occurred in 14/148 (9.5%). Conclusions Discharge blood pressure documentation, safety netting, and breastfeeding drug safety advice were high, but documentation of individualized blood pressure plans, early general practitioner review, and clear discharge communication were low. An electronic discharge template and prospective re-audit are appropriate quality-improvement interventions.
Related
- Improving Post‐Fall Assessment Documentation in Older Inpatients Using a Structured Falls Proforma: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- Early postnatal complications in small-for-gestational-age infants by gestational age and SGA severity : A retrospective cohort study
- Post-polypectomy surveillance documentation and guideline concordance: A retrospective clinical audit of physician documentation at a tertiary Saudi hospital
- Documentation-based fall categories, baseline functional status, and diagnosed multiregional injury after falls in older adults: A single-center retrospective study
- Prenatal and Postnatal Screening for Congenital Heart Disease: Prevalence and Detection Patterns From a Retrospective Cohort Study
BibTeX
@article{mohamud2026postnatal,
title = {{Postnatal Hypertension Management and Discharge Documentation: A Retrospective Clinical Audit at a UK University Hospital.}},
author = {Ikran Mohamud and Mena Abdalla and Huma Farooq},
journal = {Cureus},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.7759/cureus.116894},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928817},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Postnatal Hypertension Management and Discharge Documentation: A Retrospective Clinical Audit at a UK University Hospital.
AU - Ikran Mohamud
AU - Mena Abdalla
AU - Huma Farooq
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/25
JO - Cureus
DO - 10.7759/cureus.116894
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928817
AB - Background Postnatal hypertension requires timely blood pressure surveillance, treatment review, safety netting, and communication between maternity and community services. This audit assessed postnatal hypertension care and discharge documentation against local Trust standards at Princess Royal University Hospital. Methods A retrospective case-note audit included women with postnatal hypertension who delivered between April and September 2025. For audit eligibility, postnatal hypertension was defined as a pregnancy-related or chronic hypertensive disorder identified through prespecified Epic diagnosis filters and requiring postnatal surveillance. The clinical blood pressure threshold used for the audit was systolic blood pressure of at least 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure of at least 90 mmHg from birth through six weeks postpartum. Of 150 identified notes, 148 were included after exclusion of one pre-viable birth before 24+0 weeks and one immediate post-delivery transfer to another Trust. Statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.3.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Exploratory comparisons across pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and chronic hypertension/superimposed pre-eclampsia used Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square statistics with Monte Carlo p-values for categorical variables. Results Median maternal age was 34.0 years (IQR 30.0-37.0); 76/148 women (51.4%) had pregnancy-induced hypertension, 50/148 (33.8%) had pre-eclampsia, and 22/148 (14.9%) had chronic hypertension or superimposed pre-eclampsia. A valid discharge blood pressure was recorded in 146/148 records (98.6%); 118/146 (80.8%) were below 140/90 mmHg. Blood-pressure parameter plans, two-week general-practitioner review, and clear discharge communication were documented in 27/148 (18.2%), 34/147 (23.1%), and 16/148 (10.8%) records, respectively. Documentation of a blood pressure parameter plan (Pearson chi-square=8.551, p=0.014) and clear discharge communication (Pearson chi-square=8.349, p=0.013) differed across hypertensive disorder groups. Any postnatal antihypertensive was documented in 109/148 records (73.6%); medication documentation differed across groups (Pearson chi-square=12.669, p=0.001). Community re-referral for raised blood pressure occurred in 12/148 records (8.1%); any documented readmission occurred in 14/148 (9.5%). Conclusions Discharge blood pressure documentation, safety netting, and breastfeeding drug safety advice were high, but documentation of individualized blood pressure plans, early general practitioner review, and clear discharge communication were low. An electronic discharge template and prospective re-audit are appropriate quality-improvement interventions.
SN - 2168-8184
ER -