Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Beyond Anxiety and Avoidance: A Dynamic Feedback-Regulation Framework for Adult Romantic Attachment

Abstract

Adult attachment is commonly represented by attachment anxiety and avoidance, but these person-level dimensions do not by themselves specify how momentary relational conditions are perceived, compared with desired conditions, translated into action, and updated after interpersonal feedback. We present the Attachment Regulation and Control (ARC) framework as an integrative feedback-regulation account that makes these temporal assumptions explicit and empirically testable. In ARC, control refers to feedback-based regulation toward relational goals in the control-theoretic sense, not interpersonal dominance, coercion, or a generalized need for control. ARC does not claim a novel control-system architecture. Instead, it synthesizes established control-theoretic attachment ideas, secure-base representations, perceived partner responsiveness, relational discrepancy, dyadic regulation, and recovery into a parsimonious sequence for adult romantic relationships: perceived relational state, desired relational state, discrepancy, regulatory action, partner feedback, state updating, and recovery. The framework treats the discrepancy score itself as a falsifiable modeling restriction by comparing it with perceived-state-only, unconstrained perceived-plus-desired-state, and asymmetric discrepancy alternatives. Attachment anxiety and avoidance form core regulation moderators. Secure-base representation is a candidate requiring incremental prediction of recovery outcomes. Mentalized affectivity and regulation flexibility remain optional moderators, while adult disorganization is an independent extension outcome.

Related

  1. The mentalizing network updates neural representations of romantic interest in response to social feedback
    Benjamin Silver, Christopher Baldassano, Lila Davachi +1
    OSF PreprintsPreprintCC0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  2. Attachment-Informed Leadership (AIL): A New Leadership Framework based on Attachment Theory and Social Neuroscience
    Pascal Vrticka, Jonathan Wolf-Phillips
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  3. Surface sensing and metabolic signals drive feedback regulation of long polar fimbriae in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157
    S. Dutta, W. Galdamez, M. A. Ramirez +1
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
  4. Putrescine-responsive post-transcriptional feedback regulation of Arabidopsis ADC2 mediated by 5'-UTR elements
    Y. Hiragori, M. Yasumuro, T. Karino +6
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textPlant biologybioRxiv
  5. Mechanical‑immune feedback regulation in distraction osteogenesis: From mechanotransduction to immune microenvironment remodeling (Review).
    Xian Wang, Yuetong Wang, Shixi He +3
    Molecular medicine reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGenetics & genomicsEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{pomianek2026beyond,
  title = {{Beyond Anxiety and Avoidance: A Dynamic Feedback-Regulation Framework for Adult Romantic Attachment}},
  author = {Mateusz Pomianek},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.13312},
  eprint = {2610.13312},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13312},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Beyond Anxiety and Avoidance: A Dynamic Feedback-Regulation Framework for Adult Romantic Attachment
AU  - Mateusz Pomianek
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/09
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.13312
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13312
AB  - Adult attachment is commonly represented by attachment anxiety and avoidance, but these person-level dimensions do not by themselves specify how momentary relational conditions are perceived, compared with desired conditions, translated into action, and updated after interpersonal feedback. We present the Attachment Regulation and Control (ARC) framework as an integrative feedback-regulation account that makes these temporal assumptions explicit and empirically testable. In ARC, control refers to feedback-based regulation toward relational goals in the control-theoretic sense, not interpersonal dominance, coercion, or a generalized need for control. ARC does not claim a novel control-system architecture. Instead, it synthesizes established control-theoretic attachment ideas, secure-base representations, perceived partner responsiveness, relational discrepancy, dyadic regulation, and recovery into a parsimonious sequence for adult romantic relationships: perceived relational state, desired relational state, discrepancy, regulatory action, partner feedback, state updating, and recovery. The framework treats the discrepancy score itself as a falsifiable modeling restriction by comparing it with perceived-state-only, unconstrained perceived-plus-desired-state, and asymmetric discrepancy alternatives. Attachment anxiety and avoidance form core regulation moderators. Secure-base representation is a candidate requiring incremental prediction of recovery outcomes. Mentalized affectivity and regulation flexibility remain optional moderators, while adult disorganization is an independent extension outcome.
ER  -