Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 55 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDEnvironmental science & technology

Long-Term Monitoring of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Interpretable Machine Learning Models for Methane Prediction in Dairy Cattle Slurry Storage.

  1. 1Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy, Potsdam14469, Germany.
  2. 2Institute of Animal Hygiene and Environmental Health, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin14163, Germany.
  3. 3Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environmental Engineering, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra65-516, Poland.

Abstract

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from continuously filled dairy cattle slurry storage remain difficult to estimate under practical conditions. This study monitored methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, and slurry physicochemical properties for 15 months in laboratory-scale storage tanks designed to reproduce key features of on-farm storage, including continuous filling, farm-derived temperature dynamics, and periodic emptying events. N2O concentrations remained below 0.5 ppm and contributed negligibly to measured direct GHG emissions. In contrast, CH4 showed pronounced seasonal variability: 94.5% of annual CH4 emissions occurred during summer and autumn, whereas only 5.5% occurred during winter and spring. Summer emptying caused a sharp decline in the CH4 flux followed by partial recovery, whereas emptying during colder periods had limited effects. Machine learning (ML) models achieved robust performance during temporal external validation (R2 = 0.82) and identified pH, temperature, and volatile fatty acids as key nonlinear predictors of CH4 emissions. By combining cross-season monitoring with interpretable ML models, this study highlights the importance of long-term observations for characterizing CH4 emissions from continuously filled dairy cattle slurry storage estimation and targeted mitigation.

Related

  1. Photocatalytic strategies for mitigating microplastic pollution and greenhouse gas emissions
    Marjan Salari, Chin Wei Lai, Ali Saber +1
    iSciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0CatalysisEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossrefCell Press
  2. Precession and meltwater control of greenhouse gas emissions from terrestrial sources during the last glacial period
    Mateo Duque-Villegas, Thomas Kleinen, Victor Brovkin +3
    EGUspherePreprintCC BY 4.0General earth scienceEGUsphere
  3. Regionalized greenhouse gas emissions and infrastructure requirements for future global iron and steel production
    Tom Terlouw, Carina Harpprecht, Christian Bauer
    Communications Earth & EnvironmentPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral earth scienceCrossref
  4. A study of the greenhouse gas emissions inventory and driving factors decomposition in Tongzhou, China
    Xiaoyi Hu, Wei Wen, Tao Yang +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossref
  5. Flooding‐Driven Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Global Upland Croplands
    Shuilian Bi, Zhifeng Yan, Zhengkui Ge +5
    Advanced SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHydrology & soilsPMC
BibTeX
@article{song2026longterm,
  title = {{Long-Term Monitoring of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Interpretable Machine Learning Models for Methane Prediction in Dairy Cattle Slurry Storage.}},
  author = {Zhenhua Song and Aditya Rawat and Tina Kabelitz and Barbara Amon and Qianying Yi and David Janke and Thomas Amon},
  journal = {Environmental science \& technology},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1021/acs.est.6c06417},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42915415},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Long-Term Monitoring of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Interpretable Machine Learning Models for Methane Prediction in Dairy Cattle Slurry Storage.
AU  - Zhenhua Song
AU  - Aditya Rawat
AU  - Tina Kabelitz
AU  - Barbara Amon
AU  - Qianying Yi
AU  - David Janke
AU  - Thomas Amon
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
JO  - Environmental science & technology
DO  - 10.1021/acs.est.6c06417
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42915415
AB  - Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from continuously filled dairy cattle slurry storage remain difficult to estimate under practical conditions. This study monitored methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, and slurry physicochemical properties for 15 months in laboratory-scale storage tanks designed to reproduce key features of on-farm storage, including continuous filling, farm-derived temperature dynamics, and periodic emptying events. N2O concentrations remained below 0.5 ppm and contributed negligibly to measured direct GHG emissions. In contrast, CH4 showed pronounced seasonal variability: 94.5% of annual CH4 emissions occurred during summer and autumn, whereas only 5.5% occurred during winter and spring. Summer emptying caused a sharp decline in the CH4 flux followed by partial recovery, whereas emptying during colder periods had limited effects. Machine learning (ML) models achieved robust performance during temporal external validation (R2 = 0.82) and identified pH, temperature, and volatile fatty acids as key nonlinear predictors of CH4 emissions. By combining cross-season monitoring with interpretable ML models, this study highlights the importance of long-term observations for characterizing CH4 emissions from continuously filled dairy cattle slurry storage estimation and targeted mitigation.
SN  - 0013-936X
SN  - 1520-5851
ER  -