Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYAIDS research and treatment

A Highly Sensitive and Specific Rapid Lateral Flow Assay for the HIV Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors Bictegravir, Cabotegravir, and Dolutegravir.

  1. 1Division of HIV Prevention, Laboratory Branch CDC Atlanta Georgia USA cdc.gov.
  2. 2Division of Global HIV and TB, International Laboratory Branch CDC Atlanta Georgia USA cdc.gov.

Abstract

Background

Second-generation HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs)-bictegravir (BIC), cabotegravir (CAB), and dolutegravir (DTG)-are leading components of highly potent antiretroviral therapy, and CAB is also used for long-acting chemoprevention. Rapid detection of clinically relevant INSTI concentrations could support point-of-care assessment and real-time clinical decision-making. We developed a lateral flow assay (LFA) that detects BIC, CAB, and DTG in whole blood and plasma and evaluated its performance against predefined concentration thresholds and high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).Methods

A single LFA cassette design was developed using a monoclonal antibody to distinguish BIC, CAB, and DTG concentrations below trough, at minimal-to-moderate trough, and at ideal concentrations. LFA results were read visually at 20 min and were compared with LC-MS/MS-quantified INSTI concentrations for 124 clinical plasma specimens.Results

For 24 plasma samples from US participants receiving treatment involving one of the three INSTIs, the LFA interpretations matched all LC-MS/MS results except for one DTG specimen, which was interpreted by LFA as 1.0-1.6 μg/mL but measured 2.1 μg/mL by LC-MS/MS. Among 100 plasma remnants from routine national surveillance in Eswatini, the LFA correctly interpreted DTG concentrations in 95 specimens. Four specimens had DTG LC-MS/MS concentrations slightly above the LFA-determined range, differing by ≤ 0.1 μg/mL, and one specimen measured at 1.20 μg/mL by LC-MS/MS was interpreted as ≥ 1.6 μg/mL by LFA. In total, 6 of 124 specimens (4.8%) had LFA-interpreted INSTI concentrations that varied slightly from the LC-MS/MS results, with no statistically significant difference in overall performance by Wilcoxon signed-rank test (W = 8.00, p = 0.94, one-tailed).Conclusions

The LFA design successfully provided clinically useful interpretations of BIC, CAB, and DTG concentrations with minor discrepancies in < 5% of samples. Importantly, all low-concentration samples of < 1 μg/mL were correctly interpreted by LFA. The assay shows promise as a point-of-care tool for assessing clinically relevant INSTI concentrations.

Related

  1. Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide for HIV: a meta-analysis of efficacy across treatment-naïve and experienced populations and comparative effectiveness versus dolutegravir/lamivudine
    Mingxia Cheng, Aiwen Wang, Qingshuang Zhu +6
    Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Pharmacology & toxicologyFrontiersCrossref
  2. Pharmacovigilance of Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors (INSTIs) in Botswana: Safety Signals, Report Completeness, and Causality Assessment
    P. Pono, V. Cheng, A. M. Jones
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  3. Cumulative exposure to integrase inhibitors and metabolic factors as independent predictors of severe hepatic steatosis in people with HIV.
    Francesca Panza, Manuel Crispo, Margherita Sambo +9
    The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  4. HIV resistance in patients with virological failure to single tablet regimen: Roles of second generation integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs)
    Hung-Chin Tsai, I-Tzu Chen, Hui-Min Chang
    Journal of Infection and Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textInfectious diseaseDOAJ
  5. Androgen Synthesis Inhibitors vs Androgen Receptor Inhibitors and Survival in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.
    Georges Gebrael, Yeonjung Jo, Varun Nandakumar +14
    JAMA network openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{wei2026highly,
  title = {{A Highly Sensitive and Specific Rapid Lateral Flow Assay for the HIV Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors Bictegravir, Cabotegravir, and Dolutegravir.}},
  author = {Xierong Wei and Ae S Youngpairoj and Richard Haaland and Chuong Dinh and Hetal K Patel and Jose J Perez and Kristin Brown and Thomas H Vanderford and Jeffrey A Johnson},
  journal = {AIDS research and treatment},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1155/arat/4809477},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928809},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A Highly Sensitive and Specific Rapid Lateral Flow Assay for the HIV Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors Bictegravir, Cabotegravir, and Dolutegravir.
AU  - Xierong Wei
AU  - Ae S Youngpairoj
AU  - Richard Haaland
AU  - Chuong Dinh
AU  - Hetal K Patel
AU  - Jose J Perez
AU  - Kristin Brown
AU  - Thomas H Vanderford
AU  - Jeffrey A Johnson
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/25
JO  - AIDS research and treatment
DO  - 10.1155/arat/4809477
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928809
AB  - Background  Second-generation HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs)-bictegravir (BIC), cabotegravir (CAB), and dolutegravir (DTG)-are leading components of highly potent antiretroviral therapy, and CAB is also used for long-acting chemoprevention. Rapid detection of clinically relevant INSTI concentrations could support point-of-care assessment and real-time clinical decision-making. We developed a lateral flow assay (LFA) that detects BIC, CAB, and DTG in whole blood and plasma and evaluated its performance against predefined concentration thresholds and high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).Methods  A single LFA cassette design was developed using a monoclonal antibody to distinguish BIC, CAB, and DTG concentrations below trough, at minimal-to-moderate trough, and at ideal concentrations. LFA results were read visually at 20 min and were compared with LC-MS/MS-quantified INSTI concentrations for 124 clinical plasma specimens.Results  For 24 plasma samples from US participants receiving treatment involving one of the three INSTIs, the LFA interpretations matched all LC-MS/MS results except for one DTG specimen, which was interpreted by LFA as 1.0-1.6 μg/mL but measured 2.1 μg/mL by LC-MS/MS. Among 100 plasma remnants from routine national surveillance in Eswatini, the LFA correctly interpreted DTG concentrations in 95 specimens. Four specimens had DTG LC-MS/MS concentrations slightly above the LFA-determined range, differing by ≤ 0.1 μg/mL, and one specimen measured at 1.20 μg/mL by LC-MS/MS was interpreted as ≥ 1.6 μg/mL by LFA. In total, 6 of 124 specimens (4.8%) had LFA-interpreted INSTI concentrations that varied slightly from the LC-MS/MS results, with no statistically significant difference in overall performance by Wilcoxon signed-rank test (W = 8.00, p = 0.94, one-tailed).Conclusions  The LFA design successfully provided clinically useful interpretations of BIC, CAB, and DTG concentrations with minor discrepancies in < 5% of samples. Importantly, all low-concentration samples of < 1 μg/mL were correctly interpreted by LFA. The assay shows promise as a point-of-care tool for assessing clinically relevant INSTI concentrations.
SN  - 2090-1240
SN  - 2090-1259
ER  -