Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,067 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Physics and Morphology Constrained Quantitative Susceptibility Based Segmentation of Cerebral Veins

  1. 1Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Physics, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada

Abstract

Purpose: Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) provides venous contrast through the paramagnetic susceptibility of deoxyhemoglobin and can be used to estimate oxygen extraction fraction (OEF), a marker of cerebral metabolism. However, cerebral vein segmentation remains challenging due to artifacts, variability across QSM reconstruction methods, and limited sensitivity of conventional vessel-filtering approaches to small cortical veins. This study proposes a physics- and morphology-constrained deep learning framework for cerebral vein segmentation on QSM. Methods: Thirty subjects were manually segmented and used to train an attention-gated UNet. In addition to supervised Dice and cross-entropy losses, the network incorporated two selfsupervised constraints. A physics-informed loss enforced consistency between the measured local field and a field simulated from predicted veins using dipole convolution. A Frangi vesselness loss encouraged anatomically plausible tubular structures. Segmentation performance was evaluated on an independent multi-center cohort and compared with a prior vessel-filtering method and a supervised U-Net baseline. Physiological relevance was assessed by comparing QSM-derived venous OEF with calibrated fMRI-derived OEF. Results: The proposed model achieved superior segmentation performance (centreline Dice = 0.70 {+/-} 0.08) compared with MSVF (0.44 {+/-} 0.09) and the U-Net baseline (0.57 {+/-} 0.14). Improvements were most pronounced in smaller veins, resulting in greater vessel continuity. Venous OEF derived from the proposed framework demonstrated stronger agreement with calibrated fMRI-derived OEF than the previous approach. Conclusion: Combining supervised learning with physics- and morphology-based constraints improves vein segmentation and enhances the sensitivity of QSM-derived OEF measurements. Code and model weights are publicly available at https://github.com/QuantitativePhysiologyImagingLab/VeinSeg

Related

  1. Segmentation-Less 3D Quantitative Image Analysis of Tissue Architecture with Application to the Localization of Organelles in MDCK Cysts
    Khaled Khairy, Uros Krzic, Petra Jakob +3
    Biophysical JournalPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textBiophysicsHAL
  2. A morphology-driven workflow to decipher 3D electron microscopy segmentation in diatoms
    Clarisse Uwizeye, Serena Flori, Joanell Angulo +4
    Cell Reports MethodsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textBiophysicsHAL
  3. SpaCut: Transcript-Aware Morphology Fusion for Robust Cell Segmentation in Subcellular Spatial Transcriptomics.
    Yongheng Li, Fangfang Zhu, Wenwen Min
    Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMCPMC
  4. DUCK‐Net: automated deep learning segmentation of ductular reactions in murine liver injury captures multicellular niche dynamics from H&E morphology
    Nathalie Feeley, Kai Williams, Caitlin McCaffrey +13
    The Journal of PathologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textBiophysicsPMC
  5. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Differentiating Hydroxyapatite and Calcium Oxalate Breast Calcifications at 3T: A Phantom Study
    K. Misak, E. De Vita, C. A. Clark +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBiophysicsbioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{alkhoury2026physics,
  title = {{Physics and Morphology Constrained Quantitative Susceptibility Based Segmentation of Cerebral Veins}},
  author = {Y. C. Al-Khoury and A. Rezaei and V. Raspa and N. Slanina and H. Gresseau and Y. Xiao and B. P. Thomas and C. J. Gauthier},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.24.754280},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.24.754280v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Physics and Morphology Constrained Quantitative Susceptibility Based Segmentation of Cerebral Veins
AU  - Y. C. Al-Khoury
AU  - A. Rezaei
AU  - V. Raspa
AU  - N. Slanina
AU  - H. Gresseau
AU  - Y. Xiao
AU  - B. P. Thomas
AU  - C. J. Gauthier
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/24
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.24.754280
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.24.754280v1
AB  - Purpose: Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) provides venous contrast through the paramagnetic susceptibility of deoxyhemoglobin and can be used to estimate oxygen extraction fraction (OEF), a marker of cerebral metabolism. However, cerebral vein segmentation remains challenging due to artifacts, variability across QSM reconstruction methods, and limited sensitivity of conventional vessel-filtering approaches to small cortical veins. This study proposes a physics- and morphology-constrained deep learning framework for cerebral vein segmentation on QSM. Methods: Thirty subjects were manually segmented and used to train an attention-gated UNet. In addition to supervised Dice and cross-entropy losses, the network incorporated two selfsupervised constraints. A physics-informed loss enforced consistency between the measured local field and a field simulated from predicted veins using dipole convolution. A Frangi vesselness loss encouraged anatomically plausible tubular structures. Segmentation performance was evaluated on an independent multi-center cohort and compared with a prior vessel-filtering method and a supervised U-Net baseline. Physiological relevance was assessed by comparing QSM-derived venous OEF with calibrated fMRI-derived OEF. Results: The proposed model achieved superior segmentation performance (centreline Dice = 0.70 {+/-} 0.08) compared with MSVF (0.44 {+/-} 0.09) and the U-Net baseline (0.57 {+/-} 0.14). Improvements were most pronounced in smaller veins, resulting in greater vessel continuity. Venous OEF derived from the proposed framework demonstrated stronger agreement with calibrated fMRI-derived OEF than the previous approach. Conclusion: Combining supervised learning with physics- and morphology-based constraints improves vein segmentation and enhances the sensitivity of QSM-derived OEF measurements. Code and model weights are publicly available at https://github.com/QuantitativePhysiologyImagingLab/VeinSeg
ER  -