Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,839 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0PsyArXiv

Delayed Feedback Improves Learning in Individuals with Parkinson’s Disease

Abstract

Background: Learning and memory deficits are common in Parkinson’s Disease (PD). Effectively processing performance-related feedback is integral to learning but is often impaired in PD. Delaying feedback presentation by 6 seconds has been shown to circumvent these deficits during incremental learning tasks. The potential learning benefits of longer feedback delays, however, are unknown. The current study examined the effects of a 6-second delay and a 25-minute delay on learning during a declarative memory task in individuals with PD.

Methods: Thirty participants with PD completed a verbal paired-associates task, during which they learned word pairs via trial-by-trial accuracy feedback presented immediately after making responses (No Delay; ND), after a 6-second delay (Short Delay; SD), and after a 25-minute delay (Long Delay; LD). Mixed effects models examined the influence of feedback timing condition on both final test performance and on improvement in performance between the learning and test phases. Exploratory hierarchical mixed models with neuropsychological tests examined potential individual difference predictors of delayed feedback learning.

Results: Both SD feedback and LD feedback predicted significantly greater improvement in performance, compared to ND feedback. Better working memory performance on the Digit Span Backwards Test predicted significantly greater improvement from LD feedback.

Conclusion: Longer feedback delays improve learning during a paired associates word learning task in individuals with PD. Shorter delays previously demonstrated to benefit incremental learning may also benefit other forms of learning. Working memory capacity may be an important predictor of these learning benefits.

Related

  1. Activity-dependent adaptive deep brain stimulation improves gait in Parkinson’s disease
    Stefano Scafa, Valeria de Seta, Ruijia Wang +24
    Nature MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY10 citedNeurologyHALOpenAlex
  2. Morning lighting intervention reduces fatigue and improves sleep in Parkinson disease
    Jade S. Park, Mengxi Yang, Melba Beltre +8
    NeurotherapeuticsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyPMC
  3. Continuous Subcutaneous Foslevodopa/Foscarbidopa Improves Nonmotor Symptoms and Fluctuations in Parkinson's Disease
    Rosa De Micco, Oriana Ciaramaglia, Mattia Siciliano +4
    European Journal of NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textNeurologyPMCEurope PMC
  4. Gamified Augmented Sensorimotor Feedback During Balance Training Improves Postural Control and Nocturnal RMSSD.
    Vishruth Shatagopam, Jake Pirnazar, Phillip Goldman +3
    Journal of functional morphology and kinesiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. A deep learning-based silhouette gait detection framework for fall risk classification in Parkinson’s disease
    Slo-Li Chu, Chia-Ju Kuo, Chun-Yen Chiu +3
    Frontiers in neurologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{sucich2026delayed,
  title = {{Delayed Feedback Improves Learning in Individuals with Parkinson’s Disease}},
  author = {Kai Sucich and Christopher J. Cagna and Erica Weber and Ekaterina Dobryakova},
  howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.31234/osf.io/dvq2a_v1},
  url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/dvq2a_v1/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Delayed Feedback Improves Learning in Individuals with Parkinson’s Disease
AU  - Kai Sucich
AU  - Christopher J. Cagna
AU  - Erica Weber
AU  - Ekaterina Dobryakova
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
PB  - PsyArXiv
DO  - 10.31234/osf.io/dvq2a_v1
UR  - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/dvq2a_v1/
AB  - Background: Learning and memory deficits are common in Parkinson’s Disease (PD). Effectively processing performance-related feedback is integral to learning but is often impaired in PD. Delaying feedback presentation by 6 seconds has been shown to circumvent these deficits during incremental learning tasks. The potential learning benefits of longer feedback delays, however, are unknown. The current study examined the effects of a 6-second delay and a 25-minute delay on learning during a declarative memory task in individuals with PD.  Methods: Thirty participants with PD completed a verbal paired-associates task, during which they learned word pairs via trial-by-trial accuracy feedback presented immediately after making responses (No Delay; ND), after a 6-second delay (Short Delay; SD), and after a 25-minute delay (Long Delay; LD). Mixed effects models examined the influence of feedback timing condition on both final test performance and on improvement in performance between the learning and test phases. Exploratory hierarchical mixed models with neuropsychological tests examined potential individual difference predictors of delayed feedback learning.  Results: Both SD feedback and LD feedback predicted significantly greater improvement in performance, compared to ND feedback. Better working memory performance on the Digit Span Backwards Test predicted significantly greater improvement from LD feedback.  Conclusion: Longer feedback delays improve learning during a paired associates word learning task in individuals with PD. Shorter delays previously demonstrated to benefit incremental learning may also benefit other forms of learning. Working memory capacity may be an important predictor of these learning benefits.
ER  -