Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 5 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYBiosensors

Analytical Evaluation of Simulated Kidney-Disease Profiles: Comparison of a Portable Near-Infrared Spectrophotometer with a Benchtop FT-NIR.

  1. 1iBB-Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, i4HB-The Associate Laboratory Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, IST-Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal.
  2. 2ISEL-Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, 1549-020 Lisbon, Portugal.
  3. 3Instituto de Plasmas e Fusão Nuclear, IST-Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal.

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is commonly assessed using blood biomarkers such as creatinine, urea and albumin. This study compared a portable six-channel near-infrared (NIR) analyzer (miniNIR; 1300-2100 nm) with a benchtop Fourier-transform near-infrared (FT-NIR) instrument for the discrimination and quantification of fifty-four independent concentration-defined profiles in composed fetal bovine serum solutions spanning six simulated KDIGO categories. SVM-RBF, Random Forest, XGBoost, Logistic regression and partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were evaluated. For miniNIR binary 'healthy/disease' profile discrimination, SVM-RBF yielded a validation AUC of 1.00, accuracy of 0.91, sensitivity of 1.00 and specificity of 0.83. The six-class profile assignment was substantially more difficult: PLS-DA was selected by grouped nested cross-validation, but validation accuracy was 0.18, macro-F1 was 0.11 and macro-AUC was 0.77 across the evaluable classes. For miniNIR regression, validation R² values were 0.48 for creatinine, 0.30 for urea and 0.10 for albumin. The strongest FT-NIR validation results were R² = 0.64 for creatinine, 0.79 for urea and 0.89 for albumin, depending on the spectral window. For FT-NIR binary 'healthy/disease' profile discrimination, SVM-RBF yielded a validation AUC of 0.99, accuracy of 0.71 and a specificity of 0.47. Although the high binary AUC in this controlled concentration design for the miniNIR, it should not be interpreted as evidence of CKD-specific recognition or clinical performance. The comparison quantifies the information retained and lost when continuous FT-NIR sampling is reduced to six broad discrete channels; validation in clinically characterized human samples is required before any screening application can be considered.

Related

  1. Impact of Sample Storage Conditions on Phenolic Profiles of Commercial Wines Assessed by UHPLC-HRMS: Implications for Analytical Reproducibility
    Nahikari Prevost, Alan Jamain, Emanuele Boselli +2
    MoleculesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General chemistryCrossref
  2. Mass-Scaling of Quantum Tunnelling in Hydrogen Bonds: Analytical Model and Comparison with Multidimensional Potentials
    Krishna Kingkar Pathak
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPhysical chemistryHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  3. Comparison of Two Passive Samplers for Hydrophilic and Lipophilic Phycotoxins and Expansion of Analytical Methods for Quantification Using UPLC-MS/MS.
    Josh A Garber, Damian Shea, Juliette L Smith
    ToxinsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental chemistryEurope PMC
  4. Experimental and Analytical Evaluation of Strengthening Techniques for Ultra-High-Performance Concrete Circular Columns
    Aref Abadel, Hussein Elsanadedy, Husain Abbas +3
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Materials & polymersCrossref
  5. PyCDFT: A Python-scriptable library for analytical evaluation of orbital conceptual density (matrix) functional theory
    Bin Wang, Paul Geerlings, Paul W. Ayers +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPhysical chemistryarXiv
BibTeX
@article{serrano2026analytical,
  title = {{Analytical Evaluation of Simulated Kidney-Disease Profiles: Comparison of a Portable Near-Infrared Spectrophotometer with a Benchtop FT-NIR.}},
  author = {Diogo Serrano and Paulo Zoio and Bernardo B Carvalho and Luís P Fonseca and Cecília R C Calado},
  journal = {Biosensors},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/bios16100573},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930120},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Analytical Evaluation of Simulated Kidney-Disease Profiles: Comparison of a Portable Near-Infrared Spectrophotometer with a Benchtop FT-NIR.
AU  - Diogo Serrano
AU  - Paulo Zoio
AU  - Bernardo B Carvalho
AU  - Luís P Fonseca
AU  - Cecília R C Calado
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
JO  - Biosensors
DO  - 10.3390/bios16100573
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930120
AB  - Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is commonly assessed using blood biomarkers such as creatinine, urea and albumin. This study compared a portable six-channel near-infrared (NIR) analyzer (miniNIR; 1300-2100 nm) with a benchtop Fourier-transform near-infrared (FT-NIR) instrument for the discrimination and quantification of fifty-four independent concentration-defined profiles in composed fetal bovine serum solutions spanning six simulated KDIGO categories. SVM-RBF, Random Forest, XGBoost, Logistic regression and partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were evaluated. For miniNIR binary 'healthy/disease' profile discrimination, SVM-RBF yielded a validation AUC of 1.00, accuracy of 0.91, sensitivity of 1.00 and specificity of 0.83. The six-class profile assignment was substantially more difficult: PLS-DA was selected by grouped nested cross-validation, but validation accuracy was 0.18, macro-F1 was 0.11 and macro-AUC was 0.77 across the evaluable classes. For miniNIR regression, validation R² values were 0.48 for creatinine, 0.30 for urea and 0.10 for albumin. The strongest FT-NIR validation results were R² = 0.64 for creatinine, 0.79 for urea and 0.89 for albumin, depending on the spectral window. For FT-NIR binary 'healthy/disease' profile discrimination, SVM-RBF yielded a validation AUC of 0.99, accuracy of 0.71 and a specificity of 0.47. Although the high binary AUC in this controlled concentration design for the miniNIR, it should not be interpreted as evidence of CKD-specific recognition or clinical performance. The comparison quantifies the information retained and lost when continuous FT-NIR sampling is reduced to six broad discrete channels; validation in clinically characterized human samples is required before any screening application can be considered.
SN  - 2079-6374
ER  -