Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,693 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

COSMOS-Web: From early star-formation enhancement to late suppression in galaxy groups

20 more authors

Abstract

Galaxy groups trace dense environments where interactions, gas removal, and reduced accretion may drive quenching. Common diagnostics trace star formation over short timescales (≲100 Myr); time-resolved star formation histories (SFHs) separate recent changes from longer-term evolution at fixed mass and redshift. Using COSMOS-Web data, we test how group environment correlates with star-formation activity and its evolution with cosmic time and group-centric distance, contrasting high-richness groups with excluded field galaxies. We combine COSMOS2025/COSMOS-Web stellar masses and non-parametric SFHs with group detections and memberships from AMICO (Adaptive Matched Identifier of Clustered Objects), comparing stacked SFHs of matched group and field galaxies and measuring how the SFH offset evolves with group-centric distance for the richest groups. Massive galaxies (log(M⋆/M⊙)>10.5) show the largest offsets but are already quenched in both environments. For lower masses (8.1<log(M⋆/M⊙)<10.5), suppression is clearest at z<1.5 (deficit up to 0.8 dex), while at z>1.5 SFHs show weak suppression or occasional enhancement. The radial signal evolves similarly: quenching is broad at low z, the inner-outer contrast sharpens at z≳1, and any ordering at z≳2 is tentative given growing uncertainties in the AMICO centroids. These results suggest an evolving picture: groups are more mixed at early epochs, with both suppressed and occasionally elevated SFHs, partly reflecting high-z uncertainties, while suppression dominates from z≲1.5, most clearly for low-to-intermediate-mass galaxies. Inner-region galaxies likely spend more time in the group potential, undergo more passages through dense intra-group gas, and accrete less pristine cold gas, making quenching progressively clearer with cosmic time.

Related

  1. pop-cosmos : Galaxy size evolution across structural and star-formation classifications in COSMOS-Web
    Madalina N Tudorache, Hiranya V Peiris, Stephen Thorp +7
    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  2. pop-cosmos: Galaxy size evolution across structural and star-formation classifications in COSMOS-Web
    Madalina N. Tudorache, Hiranya V. Peiris, Stephen Thorp +7
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyGalaxiesarXiv
  3. X-ray Characterization of Galaxy Groups and Hickson Groups in COSMOS-Web to z~3.8 I. X-ray Luminosity Function Evolution
    Ghassem Gozaliasl, Günther Hasinger, Gavin Leroy +35
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGalaxiesarXiv
  4. Prevalence of radio Active Galactic Nuclei in galaxy groups since z=3.5 in the COSMOS-Web field
    F. Ubertosi, I. Delvecchio, I. Prandoni +30
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGalaxiesarXiv
  5. JWST Reveals a Candidate Supermassive Black Hole Binary at z=4.3 in the Brightest Sub-millimeter Galaxy in COSMOS-Web
    Jed Mckinney, Ansh Gupta, Julian B Munoz +13
    HALPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyGalaxiesHALarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{arangotoro2026cosmosweb,
  title = {{COSMOS-Web: From early star-formation enhancement to late suppression in galaxy groups}},
  author = {R. C. Arango-Toro and C. Laigle and J. Lewis and M. Joly and G. Toni and C. M. Casey and J. S. Kartaltepe and O. Ilbert and M. Shuntov and H. B. Akins and L. Paquereau and Y. Dubois and M. Franco and G. A. Mamon and G. Aufort and A. L. Faisst and Z. Ghaffari and G. Gozaliasl and H. Hatamnia and M. Hirschmann and M. Huertas-Company and A. M. Koekemoer and R. Laishram and D. Le Borgne and G. Leroy and H. J. McCracken and L. Moscardini and A. Nuñez-Castiñeyra and J. R. Rhee and R. M. Samir and M. Trebitsch and L. Tresse},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.26348},
  eprint = {2608.26348},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26348},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - COSMOS-Web: From early star-formation enhancement to late suppression in galaxy groups
AU  - R. C. Arango-Toro
AU  - C. Laigle
AU  - J. Lewis
AU  - M. Joly
AU  - G. Toni
AU  - C. M. Casey
AU  - J. S. Kartaltepe
AU  - O. Ilbert
AU  - M. Shuntov
AU  - H. B. Akins
AU  - L. Paquereau
AU  - Y. Dubois
AU  - M. Franco
AU  - G. A. Mamon
AU  - G. Aufort
AU  - A. L. Faisst
AU  - Z. Ghaffari
AU  - G. Gozaliasl
AU  - H. Hatamnia
AU  - M. Hirschmann
AU  - M. Huertas-Company
AU  - A. M. Koekemoer
AU  - R. Laishram
AU  - D. Le Borgne
AU  - G. Leroy
AU  - H. J. McCracken
AU  - L. Moscardini
AU  - A. Nuñez-Castiñeyra
AU  - J. R. Rhee
AU  - R. M. Samir
AU  - M. Trebitsch
AU  - L. Tresse
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.26348
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26348
AB  - Galaxy groups trace dense environments where interactions, gas removal, and reduced accretion may drive quenching. Common diagnostics trace star formation over short timescales (≲100 Myr); time-resolved star formation histories (SFHs) separate recent changes from longer-term evolution at fixed mass and redshift. Using COSMOS-Web data, we test how group environment correlates with star-formation activity and its evolution with cosmic time and group-centric distance, contrasting high-richness groups with excluded field galaxies. We combine COSMOS2025/COSMOS-Web stellar masses and non-parametric SFHs with group detections and memberships from AMICO (Adaptive Matched Identifier of Clustered Objects), comparing stacked SFHs of matched group and field galaxies and measuring how the SFH offset evolves with group-centric distance for the richest groups. Massive galaxies (log(M_⋆/M_⊙)>10.5) show the largest offsets but are already quenched in both environments. For lower masses (8.1<log(M_⋆/M_⊙)<10.5), suppression is clearest at z<1.5 (deficit up to 0.8 dex), while at z>1.5 SFHs show weak suppression or occasional enhancement. The radial signal evolves similarly: quenching is broad at low z, the inner-outer contrast sharpens at z≳1, and any ordering at z≳2 is tentative given growing uncertainties in the AMICO centroids. These results suggest an evolving picture: groups are more mixed at early epochs, with both suppressed and occasionally elevated SFHs, partly reflecting high-z uncertainties, while suppression dominates from z≲1.5, most clearly for low-to-intermediate-mass galaxies. Inner-region galaxies likely spend more time in the group potential, undergo more passages through dense intra-group gas, and accrete less pristine cold gas, making quenching progressively clearer with cosmic time.
ER  -