Making Context Count: Assessing Needs and Implementation Readiness for Health Technology Innovation
Abstract
Background: Health technology assessment (HTA) evaluates innovations primarily under controlled conditions, decoupled from the system and equity context that determines real-world value. The EU HTA Regulation (EU 2021/2282), in force January 2025, establishes EU-level Joint Clinical Assessments while preserving national context-specific evaluation. No systematic framework currently makes context — infrastructure, workforce, equity, unmet need — analytically tractable alongside clinical evidence.
Methods: Drawing on the FED-SCAN federated AI-enhanced horizon scanning framework and WHO/EU justice and equity literature, we propose a four-pillar approach: (1) multi-criteria unmet needs assessment including patient-reported outcomes and socioeconomic factors; (2) contextual requirements mapping using Health in All Policies and WHO HESRi five conditions for health equity; (3) implementation readiness assessment via a Listen/Learn/Limit/Lean decision tree; (4) equity-sensitive value assessment applying prioritarian and accountability-for-reasonableness principles.
Results: Applied across pilot use cases (oncology, diabetes, rare diseases): (1) identical technologies show overuse in one context and underuse in another; (2) PROMs reveal value dimensions missed by clinical endpoints; (3) EU/national reimbursement disjunction can be reduced by mapping implementation requirements explicitly; (4) federated AI signals enable early identification of technology-context mismatch before costly adoption failures.
Conclusions: Context must be a primary analytical input — not a post-hoc consideration — in health technology decisions. The proposed framework enables HTA bodies and policymakers to assess needs, requirements and readiness alongside clinical value, supporting equitable and sustainable adoption of innovation across diverse European health systems.
Key messages: • Context — not just clinical evidence — determines whether health technology innovation generates real-world value for populations across diverse European health systems.
• A four-pillar framework integrating needs assessment, system context, implementation readiness and equity enables evidence-informed health technology adoption decisions.
Related
- Beyond technology acceptance: AI-application readiness and continuance intention among Chinese university students—a measurement-aware secondary analysis
- Recent biotechnological advances and technology readiness level of natural products derived from marine fungi
- Assessing innovation in gerontology: promote disruption, leave well enough alone, or unclear?
- Assessing Feasibility and Readiness for 3D Printing Integration in Prosthetics and Orthotics: A Cross-Sectional Study
- Supporting researcher compliance: assessing institutional readiness for the 2023 NIH Data Management and Sharing Policy
BibTeX
@article{otte2026making,
title = {{Making Context Count: Assessing Needs and Implementation Readiness for Health Technology Innovation}},
author = {M Otte and C De Waure and E Petelos and P Garcia Sanz and J Blasco Amaro},
journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1562},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1562},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Making Context Count: Assessing Needs and Implementation Readiness for Health Technology Innovation
AU - M Otte
AU - C De Waure
AU - E Petelos
AU - P Garcia Sanz
AU - J Blasco Amaro
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - The European Journal of Public Health
DO - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1562
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1562
AB - Background: Health technology assessment (HTA) evaluates innovations primarily under controlled conditions, decoupled from the system and equity context that determines real-world value. The EU HTA Regulation (EU 2021/2282), in force January 2025, establishes EU-level Joint Clinical Assessments while preserving national context-specific evaluation. No systematic framework currently makes context — infrastructure, workforce, equity, unmet need — analytically tractable alongside clinical evidence. Methods: Drawing on the FED-SCAN federated AI-enhanced horizon scanning framework and WHO/EU justice and equity literature, we propose a four-pillar approach: (1) multi-criteria unmet needs assessment including patient-reported outcomes and socioeconomic factors; (2) contextual requirements mapping using Health in All Policies and WHO HESRi five conditions for health equity; (3) implementation readiness assessment via a Listen/Learn/Limit/Lean decision tree; (4) equity-sensitive value assessment applying prioritarian and accountability-for-reasonableness principles. Results: Applied across pilot use cases (oncology, diabetes, rare diseases): (1) identical technologies show overuse in one context and underuse in another; (2) PROMs reveal value dimensions missed by clinical endpoints; (3) EU/national reimbursement disjunction can be reduced by mapping implementation requirements explicitly; (4) federated AI signals enable early identification of technology-context mismatch before costly adoption failures. Conclusions: Context must be a primary analytical input — not a post-hoc consideration — in health technology decisions. The proposed framework enables HTA bodies and policymakers to assess needs, requirements and readiness alongside clinical value, supporting equitable and sustainable adoption of innovation across diverse European health systems. Key messages: • Context — not just clinical evidence — determines whether health technology innovation generates real-world value for populations across diverse European health systems. • A four-pillar framework integrating needs assessment, system context, implementation readiness and equity enables evidence-informed health technology adoption decisions.
SN - 1101-1262
SN - 1464-360X
ER -