Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,125 studies31 sourcesUpdated 41 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Examining the anticipated uptake and acceptability of heat therapy in males: Expectations and perceptions before and after hot water immersion

  1. 1Environmental Ergonomics Research Centre, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom
  2. 2School of Sport, Exercise, and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom
  3. 3The Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background: Passive heat therapy (HT), such as hot water immersion (HWI), has emerged as a non-exercise health-promoting intervention. Epidemiological data demonstrate that HT engagement reduces cardiovascular disease risk, however, experimental protocols are often time intensive and perceived as uncomfortable. This study explored the expectations, perceptions and anticipated uptake of HT in response to an acute HWI session. Methods: Twenty young, healthy, recreationally active males completed a 60-min HWI protocol (39°C) separated by bespoke pre- and post-immersion surveys. Results: Before immersion, most participants agreed HWI would be easy to complete (90%) and relaxing (85%). Despite reported thermal discomfort during immersion, post-immersion, most participants perceived HWI as enjoyable (60%) and relaxing (65%), although 50% also agreed HWI was more challenging and less enjoyable than expected. Participants indicated that if given autonomy during HWI, the average self-selected duration would have been 31 ± 13 min. Assuming access, the anticipated weekly future engagement with HT was 49 ± 31 min, with 15% of participants indicating they would select HT over walking to improve their health. Time availability emerged as the most influential factor, with all participants agreeing this would impact future engagement. Conclusions: Although there were positive perceptions of HWI, thermal discomfort and time requirements may limit the uptake of HT as a health-promoting intervention. These findings highlight a discrepancy between the duration of commonly employed HT experimental protocols and what individuals appear realistically willing or able to complete. Future HT research should prioritise acceptability and accessibility by developing time-efficient and thermally tolerable protocols.

Related

  1. Operators matter \textendash An assessment of the expectations, perceptions, and performance of dentists, postgraduate students, and dental prosthetist students using intraoral scanning
    Khaled E. Ahmed, Karen G. Peres, Marco A. Peres +3
    Journal of DentistryPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text14 citedGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  2. Reframing Expectations about aging - Physical Activity and Inclusive Reappraisal (RE-PAIR): Protocol of a randomized intervention promoting positive self-perceptions of aging and physical activity in older couples
    Serena Sabatini, Francesco Pagnini, Alice Martins Pederiva +12
    BMC GeriatricsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceHAL
  3. Immersion 360, a european patient-partnered research project aimed at developing communication skills in paediatrics and raising awareness of interprofessional collaboration practice in partnership.
    Luigi Flora
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyEpidemiology & public healthHALHAL
  4. Anticipated distractor processing relies on distinct representational states before and after distractor onset in visual working memory
    K. Wang, C. A. Seger, Q. Chen +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. A Conservation Roadmap for the Anticipated Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) Metapopulation in Central Europe-Modelling Effective Deme Sizes and Connectivity.
    Gregor Rolshausen, Christine Breitenmoser, Jarmila Krojerová-Prokešová +2
    Evolutionary applicationsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEcologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{bellini2026examining,
  title = {{Examining the anticipated uptake and acceptability of heat therapy in males: Expectations and perceptions before and after hot water immersion}},
  author = {David Bellini and Alex Lloyd and Christof A. Leicht and Simon Hodder and Matthew J. Maley},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0353797},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353797},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Examining the anticipated uptake and acceptability of heat therapy in males: Expectations and perceptions before and after hot water immersion
AU  - David Bellini
AU  - Alex Lloyd
AU  - Christof A. Leicht
AU  - Simon Hodder
AU  - Matthew J. Maley
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/08
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0353797
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353797
AB  - Background: Passive heat therapy (HT), such as hot water immersion (HWI), has emerged as a non-exercise health-promoting intervention. Epidemiological data demonstrate that HT engagement reduces cardiovascular disease risk, however, experimental protocols are often time intensive and perceived as uncomfortable. This study explored the expectations, perceptions and anticipated uptake of HT in response to an acute HWI session. Methods: Twenty young, healthy, recreationally active males completed a 60-min HWI protocol (39°C) separated by bespoke pre- and post-immersion surveys. Results: Before immersion, most participants agreed HWI would be easy to complete (90%) and relaxing (85%). Despite reported thermal discomfort during immersion, post-immersion, most participants perceived HWI as enjoyable (60%) and relaxing (65%), although 50% also agreed HWI was more challenging and less enjoyable than expected. Participants indicated that if given autonomy during HWI, the average self-selected duration would have been 31 ± 13 min. Assuming access, the anticipated weekly future engagement with HT was 49 ± 31 min, with 15% of participants indicating they would select HT over walking to improve their health. Time availability emerged as the most influential factor, with all participants agreeing this would impact future engagement. Conclusions: Although there were positive perceptions of HWI, thermal discomfort and time requirements may limit the uptake of HT as a health-promoting intervention. These findings highlight a discrepancy between the duration of commonly employed HT experimental protocols and what individuals appear realistically willing or able to complete. Future HT research should prioritise acceptability and accessibility by developing time-efficient and thermally tolerable protocols.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -