Women’s Representation in Cardiac Anesthesiology Publications: A Multi-journal Retrospective Analysis
- 1Department of Anaesthesia, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
- 2Department of Microbiology, Bhopal Memorial Hospital and Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
Abstract
Introduction:: Gender disparities in academic medicine persist despite increasing female enrollment. Cardiac anesthesiology, a predominantly male subspecialty, may reflect systemic inequities. India contributes substantially to cardiac anesthesiology literature, yet the representation of Indian women within this global scholarly output remains uncharacterized.
Materials and Methods:: Retrospective cross-sectional study of four cardiac anesthesiology journals, January 2020 to January 2026. All articles published in the Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, and cardiac anesthesia section of Anesthesia and Analgesia analyzed. Author gender was determined by first-name analysis spanning 45 countries, supplemented by institutional verification.
Statistical Analysis:: Chi-square tests were used to compare gender proportions across authorship positions, journals, and article types. The Cochran–Armitage trend test was used to assess linear temporal trends in female authorship over the study period. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results:: Among 5,138 articles representing 22,829 author positions, women comprised 28.4% overall (F: M ratio 1:2.52). Female representation declined progressively from second authors (31.9%) to corresponding authors (22.5%) (P < 0.001). Indian women represented 26.4% of Indian first authors and 18.1% of Indian corresponding authors, both significantly lower than non-Indian counterparts (P = 0.009 and P = 0.001, respectively). Notably, Indian female first authorship showed a significant upward trend from 19.2% (2020) to 35.6% (2024) (Z = −3.65,P < 0.001).
Conclusion:: Significant gender disparities persist across cardiac anesthesiology publications globally, specifically among Indian authors. The pronounced underrepresentation of Indian women in corresponding authorship, despite an encouraging upward trend in first authorship, highlights compounded systemic barriers.
Related
- Female Representation and Quality Indicators in Anesthesiology and Critical Care Podcasts.
- Demographic Representation in Clinical Trials for Transthyretin-Associated Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Systematic Review
- Sex representation and assessment of sex-related differences in central nervous system medicine development: a retrospective cross-sectional study of European Medicines Agency marketing authorisation dossiers (2012–2022)
- Risk factors for acute gastrointestinal injury after cardiac surgery in underweight children with congenital heart disease: a single-center retrospective study
- Commentary: Incidence and independent risk factors for postoperative delirium in ICU patients after cardiopulmonary bypass cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study
BibTeX
@article{kaushal2026womens,
title = {{Women’s Representation in Cardiac Anesthesiology Publications: A Multi-journal Retrospective Analysis}},
author = {Ashutosh Kaushal and Soumya Thakur and Anuj Jain and Nikhil Nair and Shivanya Singh and Sweta Kumari},
journal = {Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.4103/aca.aca_143_26},
url = {https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_143_26},
note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Women’s Representation in Cardiac Anesthesiology Publications: A Multi-journal Retrospective Analysis
AU - Ashutosh Kaushal
AU - Soumya Thakur
AU - Anuj Jain
AU - Nikhil Nair
AU - Shivanya Singh
AU - Sweta Kumari
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/12
JO - Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
DO - 10.4103/aca.aca_143_26
UR - https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_143_26
AB - Introduction:: Gender disparities in academic medicine persist despite increasing female enrollment. Cardiac anesthesiology, a predominantly male subspecialty, may reflect systemic inequities. India contributes substantially to cardiac anesthesiology literature, yet the representation of Indian women within this global scholarly output remains uncharacterized. Materials and Methods:: Retrospective cross-sectional study of four cardiac anesthesiology journals, January 2020 to January 2026. All articles published in the Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, and cardiac anesthesia section of Anesthesia and Analgesia analyzed. Author gender was determined by first-name analysis spanning 45 countries, supplemented by institutional verification. Statistical Analysis:: Chi-square tests were used to compare gender proportions across authorship positions, journals, and article types. The Cochran–Armitage trend test was used to assess linear temporal trends in female authorship over the study period. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results:: Among 5,138 articles representing 22,829 author positions, women comprised 28.4% overall (F: M ratio 1:2.52). Female representation declined progressively from second authors (31.9%) to corresponding authors (22.5%) (P < 0.001). Indian women represented 26.4% of Indian first authors and 18.1% of Indian corresponding authors, both significantly lower than non-Indian counterparts (P = 0.009 and P = 0.001, respectively). Notably, Indian female first authorship showed a significant upward trend from 19.2% (2020) to 35.6% (2024) (Z = −3.65,P < 0.001). Conclusion:: Significant gender disparities persist across cardiac anesthesiology publications globally, specifically among Indian authors. The pronounced underrepresentation of Indian women in corresponding authorship, despite an encouraging upward trend in first authorship, highlights compounded systemic barriers.
SN - 0971-9784
SN - 0974-5181
ER -