Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Surgery Today

Sex- and the age-specific survival impacts of multiple body composition parameters in patients with gastroesophageal cancers

  1. 1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113- 8655 Japan
  2. 2Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
  3. 3Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the sex- and age-specific survival impacts of body composition (BC) parameters in patients with surgically treated gastroesophageal cancer.

Methods: A total of 1382 patients were retrospectively analyzed. The skeletal muscle index (SMI), skeletal muscle radiodensity (SMD), and visceral/subcutaneous adipose tissue index (VATI/SATI) were determined. The survival impacts of the BC parameters were investigated according to age (≥ 75 or < 75 years) and sex. Multivariate Cox hazard models were used to identify independent predictors of a poor overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results: The median age was 67 years, and 1028 (74.4%) patients were male. A low SMI (P < 0.001), a low SATI (P = 0.048), and a low SMD (P = 0.01) were independent predictors of poor OS in younger patients; however, only a low SMI (P < 0.001) had an independent impact on OS in the older group. In male patients, all four BC measures significantly demarcated OS curves (all P < 0.01), and a low SMI had an independent impact on CSS (P = 0.03). In contrast, in female patients, only SMI and SATI reliably discriminated OS curves (both P < 0.001), and a low SATI was an independent predictor of a poor CSS (P = 0.008).

Conclusions: The prognostic implications of the BC parameters may vary by age and sex in patients with gastroesophageal cancer.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-026-03458-y.

Related

  1. Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram parameters of the whole tumor based on whole-body magnetic resonance imaging can better characterize the tumor burden of multiple myeloma and predict survival prognosis
    Huazheng Dong, Qingyan Qi, Xiaodong Ji +6
    Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
  2. Progression-free survival of 23 months with second-line trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-positive gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a case report
    Yuanmei Dong, Li Zhang, Lan Zhao +1
    Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Pharmacology & toxicologyCrossref
  3. Prognostic associations between patient-reported outcomes and progression-free and overall survival in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma with PD-L1 TAP score ≥ 5%: results from the RATIONALE-305 trial
    Markus Moehler, Marcia Cruz Correa, Do Youn Oh +8
    Quality of Life ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMCEurope PMC
  4. Coronary artery calcification is not associated with survival in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: a secondary analysis of the EXPAND trial
    Hans-Jonas Meyer, Tihomir Dermendzhiev, Paul-Philipp Jacobs +5
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyPMC
  5. AI-assisted 3D thoracic body composition analysis identifies candidate imaging markers associated with overall survival in older patients with lung cancer receiving radiotherapy
    Saerom Sung, Hyun Joon Choi, Sangwoon Jeong +5
    Frontiers in oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{sugawara2026agespecific,
  title = {{Sex- and the age-specific survival impacts of multiple body composition parameters in patients with gastroesophageal cancers}},
  author = {Kotaro Sugawara and Shinichiro Shiomi and Wataru Gonoi and Satoru Taguchi and Shouhei Hanaoka and Koichi Yagi and Osamu Abe and Haruki Kume and Yoshifumi Baba},
  journal = {Surgery Today},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1007/s00595-026-03458-y},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-026-03458-y},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Sex- and the age-specific survival impacts of multiple body composition parameters in patients with gastroesophageal cancers
AU  - Kotaro Sugawara
AU  - Shinichiro Shiomi
AU  - Wataru Gonoi
AU  - Satoru Taguchi
AU  - Shouhei Hanaoka
AU  - Koichi Yagi
AU  - Osamu Abe
AU  - Haruki Kume
AU  - Yoshifumi Baba
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/07
JO  - Surgery Today
DO  - 10.1007/s00595-026-03458-y
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-026-03458-y
AB  - Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the sex- and age-specific survival impacts of body composition (BC) parameters in patients with surgically treated gastroesophageal cancer.  Methods: A total of 1382 patients were retrospectively analyzed. The skeletal muscle index (SMI), skeletal muscle radiodensity (SMD), and visceral/subcutaneous adipose tissue index (VATI/SATI) were determined. The survival impacts of the BC parameters were investigated according to age (≥ 75 or < 75 years) and sex. Multivariate Cox hazard models were used to identify independent predictors of a poor overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).  Results: The median age was 67 years, and 1028 (74.4%) patients were male. A low SMI (P < 0.001), a low SATI (P = 0.048), and a low SMD (P = 0.01) were independent predictors of poor OS in younger patients; however, only a low SMI (P < 0.001) had an independent impact on OS in the older group. In male patients, all four BC measures significantly demarcated OS curves (all P < 0.01), and a low SMI had an independent impact on CSS (P = 0.03). In contrast, in female patients, only SMI and SATI reliably discriminated OS curves (both P < 0.001), and a low SATI was an independent predictor of a poor CSS (P = 0.008).  Conclusions: The prognostic implications of the BC parameters may vary by age and sex in patients with gastroesophageal cancer.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-026-03458-y.
SN  - 0941-1291
SN  - 1436-2813
ER  -