Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Improved explicit Burgess-strength bounds for composite moduli

Abstract

Consider the character sum S(M,N)=∑n=M+1M+Nχ(n) for a non-principal Dirichlet character χ(n) to a (possibly composite) modulus q. Burgess proved that S(M,N)≪ N1/2q3/16+ε, for any ε>0. This was made explicit by Jain-Sharma et al., but only for moduli q≥ exp(exp(9.594))≈ 8.03× 106373. We prove a stronger result that holds when q≥ 1.627× 1019.

Related

  1. Explicit and logarithmically improved chromatic bounds for (P2∪ P3)-free graphs
    Lizhong Chen
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  2. Improved Explicit and Algorithmic Lower Bounds for r(5,t)
    Amrit Kandasamy, Lawrence Zhou, Levi Segal
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. Explicit upper and lower bounds on certain functions related to ζ(s) for s>1
    Stephan Ramon Garcia, Loïc Grenié, Giuseppe Molteni
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  4. Explicit height bounds on modular polynomials for the elliptic j-invariant, cube root of j, and Weber modular function f
    Abraham Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  5. Explicit bounds for Dickman's function
    Andreas Weingartner
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{punch2026improved,
  title = {{Improved explicit Burgess-strength bounds for composite moduli}},
  author = {James Punch},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.22939},
  eprint = {2610.22939},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22939},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Improved explicit Burgess-strength bounds for composite moduli
AU  - James Punch
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.22939
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22939
AB  - Consider the character sum S(M,N)=∑_n=M+1^M+Nχ(n) for a non-principal Dirichlet character χ(n) to a (possibly composite) modulus q. Burgess proved that S(M,N)≪ N^1/2q^3/16+ε, for any ε>0. This was made explicit by Jain-Sharma et al., but only for moduli q≥ exp(exp(9.594))≈ 8.03× 10^6373. We prove a stronger result that holds when q≥ 1.627× 10^19.
ER  -