Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,460 studies31 sourcesUpdated 18 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)

Baseline and Dynamic Clinical-Laboratory Risk Models for Early Progression or Death During PD-(L)1 Blockade in Advanced NSCLC: Development and Internal Validation.

  1. 1Department of Medical Oncology, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, 07058 Antalya, Türkiye.

Abstract

Background

We developed clinical-laboratory models for early progression or death within 90 days (EPD90) during PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. EPD90 is a pragmatic early-risk endpoint, not a diagnosis of hyperprogressive disease.Methods

This retrospective single-centre cohort included patients treated between January 2018 and March 2026. The four-item baseline score, EPS-4, combined bone metastasis, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), albumin and C-reactive protein. Among patients alive and progression-free at day 42, D1 added six-week changes in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and D2 additionally included LDH changes. Internal validation used bootstrap resampling and repeated cross-validation.Results

Among 282 patients, 83 (29.4%) had EPD90. In the common baseline complete-case set (n = 252; 76 events), EPS-4 had an apparent area under the curve (AUC) of 0.729 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.665-0.793). In 238 landmark-eligible complete cases (56 subsequent events), adding NLR change increased AUC from 0.718 to 0.801. Adding LDH yielded an AUC of 0.816, a modest, statistically non-significant increment (delta AUC 0.016; p = 0.094). Bootstrap-corrected calibration slopes were 0.980 for D1 and 0.957 for D2.Conclusions

NLR provided the principal dynamic contribution. D1 is emphasized as the main dynamic model; D2 remains an exploratory extension with uncertain incremental value. Unavailable laboratory collection dates and lack of external validation limit interpretation. The models and proposed thresholds require independent validation before clinical use.

Related

  1. Baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D and progression-free survival in de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: prognostic model development and external validation.
    Galip Can Uyar, Kadriye Başkurt, Orhun Akdoğan +8
    The oncologistPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Development and internal validation of a prognostic model for predicting periodontitis progression using clinical and behavioural factors
    Ankita Mathur, Kabir Suman Dash, Santosh Patil +1
    The Saudi Dental JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMCDOAJ
  3. Development and internal validation of a baseline prediction model for ≥10-point Oswestry Disability Index improvement by episode end among adults receiving outpatient physical therapy for low back pain : A retrospective cohort study
    Yazeed Temraz, Ali Sahari, Faisal Alotaibi +5
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Development and validation of a nomogram-based predictive model for infectious diseases of the spine utilizing peripheral blood laboratory parameters
    Xuejiu Cai, Zhujun Ye, Xinhui Ouyang +9
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
  5. Hidden Signals in Serum Protein Electrophoresis: Artificial Intelligence from Laboratory Pattern Recognition to Clinical Validation
    Tiziana Biagioli, Luisa Lanzilao, Francesca Romano +7
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{ozbay2026baseline,
  title = {{Baseline and Dynamic Clinical-Laboratory Risk Models for Early Progression or Death During PD-(L)1 Blockade in Advanced NSCLC: Development and Internal Validation.}},
  author = {Mehmet Fatih Ozbay and Mehmet Hunur and Sertac Vurgun and Suleyman Alkan and Sema Sezgin Goksu and Mustafa Karaca},
  journal = {Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/curroncol33100593},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930159},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Baseline and Dynamic Clinical-Laboratory Risk Models for Early Progression or Death During PD-(L)1 Blockade in Advanced NSCLC: Development and Internal Validation.
AU  - Mehmet Fatih Ozbay
AU  - Mehmet Hunur
AU  - Sertac Vurgun
AU  - Suleyman Alkan
AU  - Sema Sezgin Goksu
AU  - Mustafa Karaca
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)
DO  - 10.3390/curroncol33100593
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930159
AB  - Background  We developed clinical-laboratory models for early progression or death within 90 days (EPD90) during PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. EPD90 is a pragmatic early-risk endpoint, not a diagnosis of hyperprogressive disease.Methods  This retrospective single-centre cohort included patients treated between January 2018 and March 2026. The four-item baseline score, EPS-4, combined bone metastasis, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), albumin and C-reactive protein. Among patients alive and progression-free at day 42, D1 added six-week changes in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and D2 additionally included LDH changes. Internal validation used bootstrap resampling and repeated cross-validation.Results  Among 282 patients, 83 (29.4%) had EPD90. In the common baseline complete-case set (n = 252; 76 events), EPS-4 had an apparent area under the curve (AUC) of 0.729 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.665-0.793). In 238 landmark-eligible complete cases (56 subsequent events), adding NLR change increased AUC from 0.718 to 0.801. Adding LDH yielded an AUC of 0.816, a modest, statistically non-significant increment (delta AUC 0.016; p = 0.094). Bootstrap-corrected calibration slopes were 0.980 for D1 and 0.957 for D2.Conclusions  NLR provided the principal dynamic contribution. D1 is emphasized as the main dynamic model; D2 remains an exploratory extension with uncertain incremental value. Unavailable laboratory collection dates and lack of external validation limit interpretation. The models and proposed thresholds require independent validation before clinical use.
SN  - 1198-0052
SN  - 1718-7729
ER  -