Have you really seen this illusory face before? Illusory faces bias recognition memory reports
5 affiliations
- 1School of Optometry and Vision Science, Bar-Ilan University 1 , Ramat Gan, Israel
- 2The Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Centre, Bar-Ilan University 2 , Ramat Gan, Israel
- 3Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH 3 , Bethesda, MD, USA
- 4University at Albany, State University of New York 4 , Albany, NY, USA
- 5UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience 5 , London, UK
Abstract
Visual memory is known to be influenced by objective image properties, including image size and contrast, as well as visual category. However, the influence of illusory perceptual experience on memory remains less understood. Here we investigated whether face pareidolia, a robust illusory phenomenon where certain stimuli elicit a face-like percept despite not being real faces, influences memory. While we assumed illusory faces would be remembered better than matched control images since they are surprising, interesting, draw more attention and may be associated with longer observation times, old-new recognition memory sensitivity was not consistently influenced by the face illusion. Surprisingly, decision criterion was more liberal for illusory faces than for other categories, and this effect scaled with illusory strength such that participants were more likely to report having seen illusory faces for stronger illusory face percepts. In a two-alternative-forced-choice recognition memory paradigm that minimizes criterion influence, we found that the tendency to report having seen illusory faces is present even for unseen images. Further analyses, involving confidence ratings indicated our findings probably reflect a heightened sense of familiarity for illusory faces and not genuine false memory. Our results suggest that during retrieval, illusory faces influence decisions independently of the actual memory trace.
Related
- Plateau-gated one-shot plasticity supports continual recognition memory
- Juvenile rat's sleep enables schema memory across episodes before expression of memory for individual episodes
- Encoding activity predicts distinct recognition signals during working and long-term memory in the human hippocampus
- CA1 reinstatement and novelty response independently support recognition memory
- Anticipated distractor processing relies on distinct representational states before and after distractor onset in visual working memory
BibTeX
@article{kreichman2026have,
title = {{Have you really seen this illusory face before? Illusory faces bias recognition memory reports}},
author = {Olga Kreichman and Limor Brook and Susan G. Wardle and Sharon Gilaie-Dotan},
journal = {Royal Society Open Science},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1098/rsos.261253},
url = {https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsos/article/13/10/261253/483771/Have-you-really-seen-this-illusory-face-before},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Have you really seen this illusory face before? Illusory faces bias recognition memory reports
AU - Olga Kreichman
AU - Limor Brook
AU - Susan G. Wardle
AU - Sharon Gilaie-Dotan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - Royal Society Open Science
DO - 10.1098/rsos.261253
UR - https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsos/article/13/10/261253/483771/Have-you-really-seen-this-illusory-face-before
AB - Visual memory is known to be influenced by objective image properties, including image size and contrast, as well as visual category. However, the influence of illusory perceptual experience on memory remains less understood. Here we investigated whether face pareidolia, a robust illusory phenomenon where certain stimuli elicit a face-like percept despite not being real faces, influences memory. While we assumed illusory faces would be remembered better than matched control images since they are surprising, interesting, draw more attention and may be associated with longer observation times, old-new recognition memory sensitivity was not consistently influenced by the face illusion. Surprisingly, decision criterion was more liberal for illusory faces than for other categories, and this effect scaled with illusory strength such that participants were more likely to report having seen illusory faces for stronger illusory face percepts. In a two-alternative-forced-choice recognition memory paradigm that minimizes criterion influence, we found that the tendency to report having seen illusory faces is present even for unseen images. Further analyses, involving confidence ratings indicated our findings probably reflect a heightened sense of familiarity for illusory faces and not genuine false memory. Our results suggest that during retrieval, illusory faces influence decisions independently of the actual memory trace.
SN - 2054-5703
ER -