Analgesic efficacy of regional and local analgesic techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adults undergoing general anesthesia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
- 1Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212050, Jiangsu, China.
- 2Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212050, Jiangsu, China. [email protected].
- 3Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212050, Jiangsu, China. [email protected].
Abstract
Background
Acute pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can impair early mobility and rehabilitation. This network meta-analysis (NMA) compared regional and local analgesic techniques in adults undergoing ACLR under general anesthesia.Methods
PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to February 18, 2026, for randomized controlled trials. Risk of bias was assessed utilizing the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2), and a Bayesian random-effects NMA was performed.Results
Thirty-one studies involving 2,470 patients were included. Only six were at low risk of bias. For oral morphine milligram equivalents (OMME) at 24 h postoperatively, femoral nerve block (FNB) [mean difference (MD) = - 30.31, 95% credible interval (CrI) - 58.02, - 6.79] and FNB with sciatic nerve block (SNB) [MD = - 40.42, 95% CrI - 80.42, - 5.79] were associated with lower estimated opioid consumption than control. FNB with SNB ranked highest for lower 24-h OMME [surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) = 87.44%]. FNB with graft donor-site infiltration was associated with lower estimated pain scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) than local infiltration analgesia (MD = - 2.46, 95% CrI: -4.67, - 0.21). At 24 h, adductor canal block (ACB) with graft donor-site infiltration had lower estimated pain scores than ACB (MD = - 1.50, 95% CrI: -2.43, - 0.61). At 48 h, the 95% CrIs for all pain comparisons included 0. ACB with infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee (iPACK) had a longer estimated time to first analgesic request (TFAR) than ACB (MD = 7.50, 95% CrI: 1.92, 13.01). Regarding postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), the 95% CrIs for all comparisons included 1. In sensitivity analyses excluding high-risk studies, the CrIs for key comparisons regarding OMME and TFAR widened and included 0. Some treatment nodes were missing from certain outcome networks, and the rankings for PONV changed.Conclusion
Potential analgesic benefits varied across outcomes, but key estimates became less precise after high-risk studies were excluded. Functional outcomes were not systematically synthesized, and adverse event assessment was limited to PONV. These findings do not establish the overall clinical superiority of any single strategy.Clinical trial number
Not applicable.
Related
- Effects of isobaric spinal anesthesia combined with different nerve block techniques on postoperative pain and complications in elderly patients undergoing proximal femoral nail antirotation: a retrospective observational study
- Comparison of analgesic efficacy and safety between liposomal bupivacaine and ropivacaine for paravertebral block in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung tumor surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial
- Multimodal analgesic regimen is associated with earlier bowel recovery in infants undergoing liver transplantation: a cohort study
- Comparison of remimazolam total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane inhalational anesthesia on emergence agitation in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for gastric or colorectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
- Perioperative analgesic strategies for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BibTeX
@article{xu2026analgesic,
title = {{Analgesic efficacy of regional and local analgesic techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adults undergoing general anesthesia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.}},
author = {Liaoyuan Xu and Kefan Chen and Chun Yang and Peng Jiang},
journal = {BMC anesthesiology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1186/s12871-026-04387-6},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42972238},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Analgesic efficacy of regional and local analgesic techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adults undergoing general anesthesia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
AU - Liaoyuan Xu
AU - Kefan Chen
AU - Chun Yang
AU - Peng Jiang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/29
JO - BMC anesthesiology
DO - 10.1186/s12871-026-04387-6
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42972238
AB - Background Acute pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can impair early mobility and rehabilitation. This network meta-analysis (NMA) compared regional and local analgesic techniques in adults undergoing ACLR under general anesthesia.Methods PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to February 18, 2026, for randomized controlled trials. Risk of bias was assessed utilizing the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2), and a Bayesian random-effects NMA was performed.Results Thirty-one studies involving 2,470 patients were included. Only six were at low risk of bias. For oral morphine milligram equivalents (OMME) at 24 h postoperatively, femoral nerve block (FNB) [mean difference (MD) = - 30.31, 95% credible interval (CrI) - 58.02, - 6.79] and FNB with sciatic nerve block (SNB) [MD = - 40.42, 95% CrI - 80.42, - 5.79] were associated with lower estimated opioid consumption than control. FNB with SNB ranked highest for lower 24-h OMME [surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) = 87.44%]. FNB with graft donor-site infiltration was associated with lower estimated pain scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) than local infiltration analgesia (MD = - 2.46, 95% CrI: -4.67, - 0.21). At 24 h, adductor canal block (ACB) with graft donor-site infiltration had lower estimated pain scores than ACB (MD = - 1.50, 95% CrI: -2.43, - 0.61). At 48 h, the 95% CrIs for all pain comparisons included 0. ACB with infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee (iPACK) had a longer estimated time to first analgesic request (TFAR) than ACB (MD = 7.50, 95% CrI: 1.92, 13.01). Regarding postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), the 95% CrIs for all comparisons included 1. In sensitivity analyses excluding high-risk studies, the CrIs for key comparisons regarding OMME and TFAR widened and included 0. Some treatment nodes were missing from certain outcome networks, and the rankings for PONV changed.Conclusion Potential analgesic benefits varied across outcomes, but key estimates became less precise after high-risk studies were excluded. Functional outcomes were not systematically synthesized, and adverse event assessment was limited to PONV. These findings do not establish the overall clinical superiority of any single strategy.Clinical trial number Not applicable.
SN - 1471-2253
ER -