Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,860 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0BMC Public Health

A mixed-methods evaluation of shipshape program at a large military treatment facility: outcomes and strategic insights

Abstract

Background: Obesity is a significant public health issue affecting two in five adults in the United States, with the US Navy experiencing higher rates of overweight and obesity among military branches. The Navy’s ShipShape program aims to assist participants in adopting healthier lifestyle behaviors to achieve weight loss. While previous studies have explored the characteristics of ShipShape participants and program enhancements, a mixed-methods program evaluation of effectiveness has been lacking.

Aim: A mixed-methods approach was utilized to evaluate the ShipShape program at a large Military Treatment Facility (MTF) in Portsmouth, Virginia.

Methods: Retrospective quantitative data were analyzed from participants who attended the program in either 2022 or 2023, including demographics, program completion status, and Body Mass Index (BMI) measurements before and after program participation. Qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with participants and facilitators, focusing on the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) framework.

Results: The program evaluation included 67 participants, of whom 83.6% were active-duty military self-referrals. Among participants with complete BMI data, mean BMI decreased from 35.61 to 35.16 kg/m² ( p = 0.043). Qualitative analysis reveals four main themes: strengths in educational content, weaknesses in scheduling and communication, opportunities for increased accessibility, and threats from negative perceptions. Participants also suggested adding a virtual program option.

Conclusion and recommendations: The ShipShape program demonstrated a statistically significant but modest reduction in participant BMI. However, marketing efforts need to be enhanced to improve visibility and engagement. The program evaluation highlighted the importance of addressing negative perceptions and expanding program accessibility through virtual formats. Future studies should focus on broader program evaluations across multiple MTFs to generalize findings and assess long-term sustainability. Addressing identified limitations and incorporating a more comprehensive analysis will be essential for the continued success and effectiveness of the ShipShape program.

Related

  1. Time to Treatment Failure as a Recorded Treatment-Process Measure in C-CAT. Reply to Comment on “Facility-Level Medical Oncology Specialist Availability and First-Line Time to Treatment Failure in Lung Cancer: A Nationwide C-CAT Registry Analysis. Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33, 462”
    Shinya Kajiura, Hironaga Satake, Ryuji Hayashi +1
    Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Staff perceptions of an NHS military veterans mental health service in the UK: A qualitative evaluation
    S. Talwar, C. Carlos Osorio, E. Barslund Blackman +7
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthmedRxiv
  3. The implementation and evaluation of an advance care planning education intervention in a long-term care facility: a feasibility study.
    Kuai In Tam, Sok Leng Che, Sok Man Leong +1
    BMC nursingPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCDOAJPMC
  4. Disparities in treatment burden in Peru among people with multiple long-term conditions by geography and healthcare facility: A cross-sectional study
    Silvana Perez-Leon, Daniel Mendoza-Quispe, Maria Sofia Cuba-Fuentes +11
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
  5. Molecular Subtypes and Treatment Modalities in Breast Cancer in a Brazilian Military Hospital: An Observational Study
    Larissa Fernanda Campos Moreira da Silva, Fabiana Pirani Carneiro, Andrea Barretto Motoyama
    BioMed Research InternationalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyPMC
BibTeX
@article{maye2026mixedmethods,
  title = {{A mixed-methods evaluation of shipshape program at a large military treatment facility: outcomes and strategic insights}},
  author = {Nia N. Maye and Dziyana A. Nazaruk and William A. Mase and Andrew R. Hansen and Cheryl R. James},
  journal = {BMC Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-30013-8},
  url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-026-30013-8},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A mixed-methods evaluation of shipshape program at a large military treatment facility: outcomes and strategic insights
AU  - Nia N. Maye
AU  - Dziyana A. Nazaruk
AU  - William A. Mase
AU  - Andrew R. Hansen
AU  - Cheryl R. James
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
JO  - BMC Public Health
DO  - 10.1186/s12889-026-30013-8
UR  - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-026-30013-8
AB  - Background: Obesity is a significant public health issue affecting two in five adults in the United States, with the US Navy experiencing higher rates of overweight and obesity among military branches. The Navy’s ShipShape program aims to assist participants in adopting healthier lifestyle behaviors to achieve weight loss. While previous studies have explored the characteristics of ShipShape participants and program enhancements, a mixed-methods program evaluation of effectiveness has been lacking.  Aim: A mixed-methods approach was utilized to evaluate the ShipShape program at a large Military Treatment Facility (MTF) in Portsmouth, Virginia.  Methods: Retrospective quantitative data were analyzed from participants who attended the program in either 2022 or 2023, including demographics, program completion status, and Body Mass Index (BMI) measurements before and after program participation. Qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with participants and facilitators, focusing on the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) framework.  Results: The program evaluation included 67 participants, of whom 83.6% were active-duty military self-referrals. Among participants with complete BMI data, mean BMI decreased from 35.61 to 35.16 kg/m² ( p = 0.043). Qualitative analysis reveals four main themes: strengths in educational content, weaknesses in scheduling and communication, opportunities for increased accessibility, and threats from negative perceptions. Participants also suggested adding a virtual program option.  Conclusion and recommendations: The ShipShape program demonstrated a statistically significant but modest reduction in participant BMI. However, marketing efforts need to be enhanced to improve visibility and engagement. The program evaluation highlighted the importance of addressing negative perceptions and expanding program accessibility through virtual formats. Future studies should focus on broader program evaluations across multiple MTFs to generalize findings and assess long-term sustainability. Addressing identified limitations and incorporating a more comprehensive analysis will be essential for the continued success and effectiveness of the ShipShape program.
SN  - 1471-2458
ER  -