Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
179,152 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Innovations Agronomiques

Rethinking agricultural equipment design by understanding its uses: three insights for the agroecological transition

Abstract

Which agricultural equipment supports the agroecological transition, and how to design it, are controversial questions. To contribute to these debates, this article presents three insights drawn from an analysis of the use of agricultural equipment by farmers in transition (cherry production, arable farming, viticulture, market gardening). 1/ Moving beyond “one-equipment-at-a-time” approaches to consider the management of fleets of agricultural equipment, in order to address the feasibility of technical changes in a systemic way. 2/ Supporting the design of flexible equipment and work environments that are conducive to transitions. 3/ Recognizing that farmers contribute to the design of the agricultural equipment they use. The article concludes by highlighting the importance, for R&D and public authorities, of being transparent about the transformations in agriculture it supports when choosing to design or subsidise certain types of equipment.

Related

  1. Agricultural Equipment, Crop Protection, and Pesticide Reduction: Toward a Systemic Transformation of Farming Practices
    Xavier Reboud, Pierre Labarthe, Damien Tremeau-Busson +3
    Innovations AgronomiquesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPlant biologyHAL
  2. The contributions of agricultural equipment and digital technologies to sustainable crop protection
    Laure Latruffe, Myriam Tisserand, Cédric Seguineau +1
    Innovations AgronomiquesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPlant biologyHAL
  3. Pollinator Conservation Strategies: The Effectiveness of Agroecological Infrastructure in Agricultural Environments.
    Marta Bonforte, Roberto Catania, Maria Augusta Pereira Lima +1
    InsectsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEcologyEurope PMC
  4. Cloud Cover and Structural Observation Gaps in African Agricultural Earth Observation: Evidence from Six Agroecological Zones
    Olaoye Anthony Somide
    EarthArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyEarthArXiv
  5. Innovation processes for the agroecological transition in Maya milpa systems
    José Bernardino Castillo-Caamal, Bernard Triomphe, Jesús Francisco Escalante-Euán +4
    Revista Mexicana de AgroecosistemasPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral biologyHAL
BibTeX
@article{salembier2026rethinking,
  title = {{Rethinking agricultural equipment design by understanding its uses: three insights for the agroecological transition}},
  author = {Chloé Salembier and Annabelle Revel and Hadrien Pham},
  journal = {Innovations Agronomiques},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.17180/ciag-2026-vol114-art04},
  url = {https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05748716v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Rethinking agricultural equipment design by understanding its uses: three insights for the agroecological transition
AU  - Chloé Salembier
AU  - Annabelle Revel
AU  - Hadrien Pham
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/14
JO  - Innovations Agronomiques
DO  - 10.17180/ciag-2026-vol114-art04
UR  - https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05748716v1
AB  - Which agricultural equipment supports the agroecological transition, and how to design it, are controversial questions. To contribute to these debates, this article presents three insights drawn from an analysis of the use of agricultural equipment by farmers in transition (cherry production, arable farming, viticulture, market gardening). 1/ Moving beyond “one-equipment-at-a-time” approaches to consider the management of fleets of agricultural equipment, in order to address the feasibility of technical changes in a systemic way. 2/ Supporting the design of flexible equipment and work environments that are conducive to transitions. 3/ Recognizing that farmers contribute to the design of the agricultural equipment they use. The article concludes by highlighting the importance, for R&D and public authorities, of being transparent about the transformations in agriculture it supports when choosing to design or subsidise certain types of equipment.
SN  - 1958-5853
SN  - 1958-5853
ER  -