Conflict, legitimacy, and gendered power in European agroecology: towards a conflict-sensitive feminist analytical perspective
Abstract
Agroecology in Europe is increasingly framed as a transformative response to environmental, social, and economic pressures in contemporary agriculture. Although agroecological initiatives remain unevenly distributed and far from mainstream, current efforts to scale up and scale out are intensifying debates around legitimacy, governance, and sustainability. This paper provides a critical and conceptual interpretive framework through which agroecological transformations in Europe can be explored, focusing on how gendered power relations shape conflict, empowerment, and sustainability as agroecology becomes more visible and institutionalised. Drawing on a critical and interpretive review of interdisciplinary agroecology scholarship, feminist political ecology, and widely used empowerment and sustainability evaluation frameworks, we develop a conceptual lens that brings together gender, power, and conflict. The analysis identifies two interrelated blind spots in existing research. First, gendered power relations remain marginal in analyses of conflict and legitimacy in agroecological transformations, leading to depoliticised interpretations of struggles over authority, recognition, and participation, particularly under conditions of scaling. Second, prevailing approaches to evaluating women’s empowerment and agroecological sustainability rely on static and exogenous measures that obscure relational power dynamics, conflict, and long-term change. Building on conflict transformation theory, we argue that conflicts accompanying agroecological scaling are constitutive processes through which legitimacy, empowerment, and sustainability are negotiated across spatial, governance, and temporal scales. By centring women’s endogenous perceptions of empowerment, this paper reframes agroecological scaling as an ongoing process of legitimacy-making rather than linear expansion, contributing a theoretically grounded perspective for analysing sustainability transformations in European agroecology.
Related
- Politicisation of Agrarian Legal Conflict as Political Capital: A Fiqh Siyasah Perspective
- Democratic legitimacy and multi-stakeholder platform design in sustainability governance
- Indicators used by EU policies do not sufficiently match those needed to expand agroecology
- Recent armed conflict disrupts atmospheric climate monitoring
- An evidence-based participation conflict circularity nexus framework for integrated natural resource governance
BibTeX
@article{young2026conflict,
title = {{Conflict, legitimacy, and gendered power in European agroecology: towards a conflict-sensitive feminist analytical perspective}},
author = {J. Young and E. Skrimizea},
journal = {Sustainability Science},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1007/s11625-026-01871-3},
url = {https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05771407v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Conflict, legitimacy, and gendered power in European agroecology: towards a conflict-sensitive feminist analytical perspective
AU - J. Young
AU - E. Skrimizea
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/20
JO - Sustainability Science
DO - 10.1007/s11625-026-01871-3
UR - https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05771407v1
AB - Agroecology in Europe is increasingly framed as a transformative response to environmental, social, and economic pressures in contemporary agriculture. Although agroecological initiatives remain unevenly distributed and far from mainstream, current efforts to scale up and scale out are intensifying debates around legitimacy, governance, and sustainability. This paper provides a critical and conceptual interpretive framework through which agroecological transformations in Europe can be explored, focusing on how gendered power relations shape conflict, empowerment, and sustainability as agroecology becomes more visible and institutionalised. Drawing on a critical and interpretive review of interdisciplinary agroecology scholarship, feminist political ecology, and widely used empowerment and sustainability evaluation frameworks, we develop a conceptual lens that brings together gender, power, and conflict. The analysis identifies two interrelated blind spots in existing research. First, gendered power relations remain marginal in analyses of conflict and legitimacy in agroecological transformations, leading to depoliticised interpretations of struggles over authority, recognition, and participation, particularly under conditions of scaling. Second, prevailing approaches to evaluating women’s empowerment and agroecological sustainability rely on static and exogenous measures that obscure relational power dynamics, conflict, and long-term change. Building on conflict transformation theory, we argue that conflicts accompanying agroecological scaling are constitutive processes through which legitimacy, empowerment, and sustainability are negotiated across spatial, governance, and temporal scales. By centring women’s endogenous perceptions of empowerment, this paper reframes agroecological scaling as an ongoing process of legitimacy-making rather than linear expansion, contributing a theoretically grounded perspective for analysing sustainability transformations in European agroecology.
SN - 1862-4065
SN - 1862-4057
ER -