Democratic legitimacy and multi-stakeholder platform design in sustainability governance
- 1Institute of Political Science and Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences (D-GESS) and Albert Einstein School of Public Policy, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Corresponding author
- 2Institute of Political Science and Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences (D-GESS) and Albert Einstein School of Public Policy, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- 3Institute of Political Science and Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Environmental Social Science Department, Eawag Dübendorf, Switzerland
Abstract
Addressing complex sustainability challenges such as food system transformation requires cooperation across sectors, governance levels, and stakeholder groups. Yet such cooperation is often hindered by conflicting interests, distributional tensions, and declining trust in political institutions, which challenge both the input and output legitimacy of representative democratic decision-making processes. Deliberative and participatory sustainability governance mechanisms often struggle to deliver effective policy outcomes with high output legitimacy, while technocratic forms of sustainability governance often lack democratic input legitimacy. We argue that well-designed multi-stakeholder platforms (MSPs) can generate synergies between input and output legitimacy, rather than reinforcing trade-offs, thus serving as meaningful complements to representative democratic institutions. Drawing on sustainability governance and democratic legitimacy literatures, we develop a framework linking key MSP design features to both forms of legitimacy. We illustrate this through Germany’s Commission on the Future of Agriculture, an MSP, and conclude with a research agenda on MSP legitimacy in sustainability governance.
Related
- Stakeholder perceptions of antimicrobial resistance governance in livestock production: a cross-sectional study from North-Central Nigeria.
- Neural networks reveal emergent properties of collective learning in democratic but not despotic groups
- Social Network Analysis of Mangrove Ecosystem Management: Understanding Stakeholder Interaction in Mundu, Cirebon
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare professionals on female genital schistosomiasis in the Mabalako health zone, Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Stakeholder perspectives on implementing geographic information systems for leprosy elimination in Pakistan: A qualitative study
BibTeX
@article{maier2026democratic,
title = {{Democratic legitimacy and multi-stakeholder platform design in sustainability governance}},
author = {Maiken Maier and Lukas Paul Fesenfeld and Karin Ingold},
journal = {Cell Reports Sustainability},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.crsus.2026.100829},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsus.2026.100829},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Democratic legitimacy and multi-stakeholder platform design in sustainability governance
AU - Maiken Maier
AU - Lukas Paul Fesenfeld
AU - Karin Ingold
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/25
JO - Cell Reports Sustainability
DO - 10.1016/j.crsus.2026.100829
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsus.2026.100829
AB - Addressing complex sustainability challenges such as food system transformation requires cooperation across sectors, governance levels, and stakeholder groups. Yet such cooperation is often hindered by conflicting interests, distributional tensions, and declining trust in political institutions, which challenge both the input and output legitimacy of representative democratic decision-making processes. Deliberative and participatory sustainability governance mechanisms often struggle to deliver effective policy outcomes with high output legitimacy, while technocratic forms of sustainability governance often lack democratic input legitimacy. We argue that well-designed multi-stakeholder platforms (MSPs) can generate synergies between input and output legitimacy, rather than reinforcing trade-offs, thus serving as meaningful complements to representative democratic institutions. Drawing on sustainability governance and democratic legitimacy literatures, we develop a framework linking key MSP design features to both forms of legitimacy. We illustrate this through Germany’s Commission on the Future of Agriculture, an MSP, and conclude with a research agenda on MSP legitimacy in sustainability governance.
SN - 2949-7906
ER -