Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 45 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYDentistry journal

Early Clinical Outcomes of a Simplified Guided Single-Implant Workflow for Mandibular Overdentures: A Prospective Translational Proof-of-Concept Study.

  1. 1Department of Periodontology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
  2. 2Cosmident, Private Practice, 2500 Lier, Belgium.
  3. 3Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The present study evaluated the early clinical outcomes and translational proof-of-concept of a simplified guided single-implant workflow for mandibular overdenture rehabilitation in edentulous patients. Methods: A prospective translational clinical pilot study was conducted in 15 edentulous patients treated using a simplified flapless guided single-implant mandibular overdenture protocol. The workflow was designed to reduce procedural complexity while maintaining clinically applicable surgical and prosthetic integration under routine treatment conditions. All surgical procedures were performed by a single experienced operator. The study was conducted following institutional ethical approval and informed consent procedures. Clinical, radiographic, peri-implant, prosthetic, and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated during the 1-year follow-up period. Marginal bone loss, peri-implant clinical parameters, complications, implant survival, and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) scores were assessed. Results: All planned surgical and prosthetic procedures were completed successfully, with no major intraoperative or protocol-related complications. Implant survival was 100% during the 1-year follow-up period. Mean marginal bone loss was 0.19 ± 0.21 mm at loading and 0.25 ± 0.28 mm at 1 year. Peri-implant clinical parameters remained favorable throughout follow-up. Significant improvement in patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes was observed, with OHIP-14 scores demonstrating substantial reduction following treatment (p < 0.001). The simplified guided approach demonstrated favorable translational feasibility and practical clinical integration under routine treatment conditions. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this prospective translational clinical proof-of-concept study, the proposed simplified guided single-implant workflow demonstrated encouraging early clinical, radiographic, and patient-centered outcomes for mandibular overdenture rehabilitation. Further multicenter investigations involving larger patient cohorts, multiple operators, longer follow-up periods, and comparative study designs are required to evaluate long-term clinical performance, reproducibility, and comparative effectiveness relative to established treatment protocols.

Related

  1. Additively Manufactured Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: RCT Part 1 - Clinical and Peri-Implant Outcomes.
    Lucas Jardim da Silva, Laura Lourenço Morel, Anna Paula da Rosa Possebon +5
    Brazilian dental journalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  2. Effect of Mechanical and Thermal Aging on the Retention Stability of Attachment Systems for Mandibular Implant Overdentures
    Mustafa Yıldırım, Murat Alkurt
    Journal of functional biomaterialsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  3. Retaining Complete Overdentures With Immediately Loaded One-Piece Mini-Implants: A 24-Month Prospective Clinical Study.
    Alexander De Greef, Samuel Akhondi, Bahoz Sanaan +3
    Clinical implant dentistry and related researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEurope PMC
  4. Regenerative Endodontic Procedure in Mandibular First Molar: A Clinical Case Report
    Sorour Saeedi, Ali Hamedi, Mani Mansouri +1
    Clinical case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Beyond the Mandibular Canal: A Narrative Review of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Variations and Their Clinical Significance
    Evgenia Moschogianni, George Triantafyllou, Alexandros Samolis +4
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{tudts2026early,
  title = {{Early Clinical Outcomes of a Simplified Guided Single-Implant Workflow for Mandibular Overdentures: A Prospective Translational Proof-of-Concept Study.}},
  author = {Marco Tudts and Tashia Moodley and Rani D'haese and Stefan Vandeweghe},
  journal = {Dentistry journal},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/dj14100654},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930420},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Early Clinical Outcomes of a Simplified Guided Single-Implant Workflow for Mandibular Overdentures: A Prospective Translational Proof-of-Concept Study.
AU  - Marco Tudts
AU  - Tashia Moodley
AU  - Rani D'haese
AU  - Stefan Vandeweghe
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/09
JO  - Dentistry journal
DO  - 10.3390/dj14100654
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930420
AB  - Background/Objectives: The present study evaluated the early clinical outcomes and translational proof-of-concept of a simplified guided single-implant workflow for mandibular overdenture rehabilitation in edentulous patients. Methods: A prospective translational clinical pilot study was conducted in 15 edentulous patients treated using a simplified flapless guided single-implant mandibular overdenture protocol. The workflow was designed to reduce procedural complexity while maintaining clinically applicable surgical and prosthetic integration under routine treatment conditions. All surgical procedures were performed by a single experienced operator. The study was conducted following institutional ethical approval and informed consent procedures. Clinical, radiographic, peri-implant, prosthetic, and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated during the 1-year follow-up period. Marginal bone loss, peri-implant clinical parameters, complications, implant survival, and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) scores were assessed. Results: All planned surgical and prosthetic procedures were completed successfully, with no major intraoperative or protocol-related complications. Implant survival was 100% during the 1-year follow-up period. Mean marginal bone loss was 0.19 ± 0.21 mm at loading and 0.25 ± 0.28 mm at 1 year. Peri-implant clinical parameters remained favorable throughout follow-up. Significant improvement in patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes was observed, with OHIP-14 scores demonstrating substantial reduction following treatment (p < 0.001). The simplified guided approach demonstrated favorable translational feasibility and practical clinical integration under routine treatment conditions. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this prospective translational clinical proof-of-concept study, the proposed simplified guided single-implant workflow demonstrated encouraging early clinical, radiographic, and patient-centered outcomes for mandibular overdenture rehabilitation. Further multicenter investigations involving larger patient cohorts, multiple operators, longer follow-up periods, and comparative study designs are required to evaluate long-term clinical performance, reproducibility, and comparative effectiveness relative to established treatment protocols.
SN  - 2304-6767
ER  -