Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 32 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Statistical patterns in the Ethereum blockchain: Analysis of EOAs and smart contracts in ERC20 token network

5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Physics, National Institute of Technology, Ravangla, Sikkim, India
  2. 2SAFIR, Sorbonne University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  3. 3Sorbonne Center for Artificial Intelligence, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
  4. 4School of Electronics Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  5. 5Centre for Computational Natural Sciences and Bioinformatics, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad, India

Abstract

Scaling laws offer a powerful lens to understand complex transactional behaviors in decentralized systems. This study reveals distinctive statistical signatures in the transactional dynamics of ERC20 tokens on the Ethereum blockchain by examining over 81 million token transfers across two independent time windows: July 2017 to March 2018 and December 2019 to February 2020. Transactions are categorized into four types: EOA–EOA, EOA–SC, SC-EOA, and SC-SC based on whether the interacting addresses are Externally Owned Accounts (EOAs) or Smart Contracts (SCs), and analyzed across four equal periods (each of 3 months). To characterize and identify specific statistical patterns, we investigate the presence of two canonical scaling laws: power-law distributions and temporal Taylor’s law(TL). EOA-driven transactions exhibit consistent statistical behavior, including a near-linear relationship between trade volume and unique partners with stable power-law exponents (γ≈2.3), and adherence to TL with scaling coefficients (β≈2.3). In contrast, interactions involving SCs, especially SC-SC, exhibit sublinear scaling, unstable power-law exponents, and significantly fluctuating Taylor coefficients (variation in β to be Δβ=0.51). Moreover, SC-driven activity displays heavier-tailed distributions (γ<2), indicating bursty and protocol-level activity. The gas fee analysis further supports the difference between EOA and SC, with EOA-SC transactions incurring much higher gas fees, consistent with the greater computational complexity of smart contract execution and reinforcing the structural differences between EOA-driven activity and SC involvement. These findings reveal the characteristic differences between EOA-driven and SC–driven transaction behaviors in blockchain ecosystems. By uncovering scaling behaviors through the integration of complex systems theory and blockchain data analytics, this work provides a principled framework for understanding the underlying mechanisms of decentralized financial systems.

Related

  1. Statistical analysis provides new insights into patterns and mechanisms of the WANCY hotspot on vertebrate mitochondrial genomes
    C. Xu, M. Wilkinson
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textGenetics & genomicsbioRxiv
  2. Information contracts determine what inverse perturbation benchmarks measure
    Jianfu Li, L. Frank Huang, Wenyu Song +5
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxivPMC
  3. A proof-carrying architecture for synthetic genetic logic circuits under stochastic temporal contracts
    Arman Ferdowsi, Laura Kovacs
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSystems & synthetic biologyarXiv
  4. Bio-inspired chromatophore network model generates dynamic skin patterns akin to those observed in cephalopods
    Y. Ersoy, R. Peter, G. Barello +6
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. Shared and distinct patterns of cortical network-level functional connectivity associated with child psychopathology dimensions
    Lei Cao
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePsychiatry & mental healthOSF
BibTeX
@article{mukhia2026statistical,
  title = {{Statistical patterns in the Ethereum blockchain: Analysis of EOAs and smart contracts in ERC20 token network}},
  author = {Kundan Mukhia and S. R. Luwang and Md. Nurujjaman and Tanujit Chakraborty and Suman Saha and Chittaranjan Hens},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0358972},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358972},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Statistical patterns in the Ethereum blockchain: Analysis of EOAs and smart contracts in ERC20 token network
AU  - Kundan Mukhia
AU  - S. R. Luwang
AU  - Md. Nurujjaman
AU  - Tanujit Chakraborty
AU  - Suman Saha
AU  - Chittaranjan Hens
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0358972
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358972
AB  - Scaling laws offer a powerful lens to understand complex transactional behaviors in decentralized systems. This study reveals distinctive statistical signatures in the transactional dynamics of ERC20 tokens on the Ethereum blockchain by examining over 81 million token transfers across two independent time windows: July 2017 to March 2018 and December 2019 to February 2020. Transactions are categorized into four types: EOA–EOA, EOA–SC, SC-EOA, and SC-SC based on whether the interacting addresses are Externally Owned Accounts (EOAs) or Smart Contracts (SCs), and analyzed across four equal periods (each of 3 months). To characterize and identify specific statistical patterns, we investigate the presence of two canonical scaling laws: power-law distributions and temporal Taylor’s law(TL). EOA-driven transactions exhibit consistent statistical behavior, including a near-linear relationship between trade volume and unique partners with stable power-law exponents (γ≈2.3), and adherence to TL with scaling coefficients (β≈2.3). In contrast, interactions involving SCs, especially SC-SC, exhibit sublinear scaling, unstable power-law exponents, and significantly fluctuating Taylor coefficients (variation in β to be Δβ=0.51). Moreover, SC-driven activity displays heavier-tailed distributions (γ<2), indicating bursty and protocol-level activity. The gas fee analysis further supports the difference between EOA and SC, with EOA-SC transactions incurring much higher gas fees, consistent with the greater computational complexity of smart contract execution and reinforcing the structural differences between EOA-driven activity and SC involvement. These findings reveal the characteristic differences between EOA-driven and SC–driven transaction behaviors in blockchain ecosystems. By uncovering scaling behaviors through the integration of complex systems theory and blockchain data analytics, this work provides a principled framework for understanding the underlying mechanisms of decentralized financial systems.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -