Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 39 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFoods (Basel, Switzerland)

Nutri Veggie Index: An Innovative Nutrition Classification Scheme for Quality Assessment of Plant-Based Meat Analogues.

  1. 1Food Labeling Observatory, Nutrition and Food Service Research Center (CPPNAC), Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos 11015-020, SP, Brazil.
  2. 2Graduate Program in Nutrition, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos 11015-020, SP, Brazil.

Abstract

Growing availability and consumption of plant-based meat analogues (PBMAs) have highlighted the need for nutritional assessment tools specifically designed to address the unique characteristics of these products. This study aimed to develop a nutritional quality assessment tool for PBMAs and to evaluate its applicability, agreement with existing nutritional classification schemes, and usability among nutrition professionals. The Nutritional Quality Index for Plant-Based Meat Analogues (NCS-Nutri Veggie Index) was developed based on expert consensus recommendations and existing nutritional assessment frameworks. The index evaluates seven domains: front-of-package nutrition labeling, characteristics associated with protein quality and quantity, lipid composition, sodium content, dietary fiber, micronutrient fortification, and the inclusion of sociobiodiversity ingredients, generating scores ranging from 0 to 100 and classifying products from A (excellent) to E (poor nutritional quality). NCS-Nutri Veggie Index was applied to 334 PBMA. Among the products evaluated, most foods had intermediate nutritional quality (C), corresponding to 53.0% (n = 177), followed by good quality (B), 33.5% (n = 112). NCS-Nutri Veggie Index showed substantial or excellent agreement with Nutri-Score and the Pan American Health Organization Nutrient Profile Model. The usability questionnaire demonstrated acceptable internal consistency across all evaluated domains. These findings indicate that the tool developed for these products is capable of indicating their nutritional quality.

Related

  1. Assessment of nutrition, quality of life, and co-morbidity among the older adult(s), in a rural field practice area of a tertiary care hospital of Eastern India.
    Rosy Nayak, Smrutiranjan Nayak, Prem Sagar Panda +2
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyEurope PMCCrossref
  2. Assessment of routine facility-based monitoring of quality of reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, adolescent, elderly health and nutrition services in Cross River and Rivers States, Nigeria: cross-sectional study.
    Friday Akwagiobe Odey, Ekpereonne Babatunde Esu, Iwara Ikpi Arikpo +12
    BMC health services researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMCPMC
  3. Reverse Dorr Classification of Lateral Knee Radiographs: A Qualitative Assessment of Bone Quality in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Matthew A Beilfuss, Micah MacAskill, Kyle R Wagner +3
    Arthroplasty todayPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  4. An innovative framework for student adaptability prediction using discriminant-based classification, feature selection, and sensitivity analysis
    Lijun Mao, Kholoud Alkayid, H. S. Shreenidhi +6
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefDOAJ
  5. Assessment and development of decontamination strategies for fentanyl and fentanyl analogues
    Mikaela M. Bazley, Avril A. B. Robertson, Joanne T. Blanchfield
    RSC advancesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{locatelli2026nutri,
  title = {{Nutri Veggie Index: An Innovative Nutrition Classification Scheme for Quality Assessment of Plant-Based Meat Analogues.}},
  author = {Nathália Tarossi Locatelli and Sarah Polezi and Mariana Frazão Batista and Daniel Henrique Bandoni and Veridiana Vera de Rosso},
  journal = {Foods (Basel, Switzerland)},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/foods15193416},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42883523},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Nutri Veggie Index: An Innovative Nutrition Classification Scheme for Quality Assessment of Plant-Based Meat Analogues.
AU  - Nathália Tarossi Locatelli
AU  - Sarah Polezi
AU  - Mariana Frazão Batista
AU  - Daniel Henrique Bandoni
AU  - Veridiana Vera de Rosso
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/24
JO  - Foods (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/foods15193416
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42883523
AB  - Growing availability and consumption of plant-based meat analogues (PBMAs) have highlighted the need for nutritional assessment tools specifically designed to address the unique characteristics of these products. This study aimed to develop a nutritional quality assessment tool for PBMAs and to evaluate its applicability, agreement with existing nutritional classification schemes, and usability among nutrition professionals. The Nutritional Quality Index for Plant-Based Meat Analogues (NCS-Nutri Veggie Index) was developed based on expert consensus recommendations and existing nutritional assessment frameworks. The index evaluates seven domains: front-of-package nutrition labeling, characteristics associated with protein quality and quantity, lipid composition, sodium content, dietary fiber, micronutrient fortification, and the inclusion of sociobiodiversity ingredients, generating scores ranging from 0 to 100 and classifying products from A (excellent) to E (poor nutritional quality). NCS-Nutri Veggie Index was applied to 334 PBMA. Among the products evaluated, most foods had intermediate nutritional quality (C), corresponding to 53.0% (n = 177), followed by good quality (B), 33.5% (n = 112). NCS-Nutri Veggie Index showed substantial or excellent agreement with Nutri-Score and the Pan American Health Organization Nutrient Profile Model. The usability questionnaire demonstrated acceptable internal consistency across all evaluated domains. These findings indicate that the tool developed for these products is capable of indicating their nutritional quality.
SN  - 2304-8158
ER  -