Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0The Astrophysical Journal

Comparing the Near-infrared Spectral Energy Distributions from Different Stellar Population Synthesis Models with SPHEREx Observations

9 more authors
9 affiliations
  1. 1Seoul National University
  2. 2Yonsei University
  3. 3Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute
  4. 4California Institute of Technology
  5. 5University of California at Berkeley
  6. 6Rochester Institute of Technology
  7. 7Sejong University
  8. 8Pusan National University
  9. 9University of California Irvine

Abstract

While stellar population synthesis (SPS) models have been widely used for spectral analysis in optical wavelengths, their characteristics remain uncertain in the near-infrared (NIR) due to a relative lack of observed NIR spectra. The spectrophotometric data from SPHEREx are well-suited for investigating the performance of SPS models in the NIR, thanks to its wide wavelength coverage over 0.75–5.0 μ m. In this work, we compare the observed SPHEREx data of SDSS compact galaxies, including 2726 non-emission-line galaxies and 1163 emission-line galaxies, to the NIR SEDs predicted from the full spectrum fitting of SDSS optical spectra. We use four different SPS models that extend into the NIR: E-MILES, Bruzual & Charlot (BC03), Charlot & Bruzual (CB19), and FSPS. We find that all four models tend to overpredict the stellar continuum at 2.4–5 μ m by 0.1–0.3 mag. This trend is particularly prominent for intermediate-age stellar populations (∼1–5 Gyr), suggesting a systematic bias in the NIR SED predictions of current SPS models. For stellar populations older than 5 Gyr, E-MILES shows relatively smaller offsets at 3.8–5 μ m compared to other models. Meanwhile, for emission-line galaxies, the SPS models underestimate the SED by up to ∼0.5 mag at longer wavelengths due to the contribution of nonstellar emission. Overall, these results highlight the necessity of refining the NIR stellar spectral features in SPS models, such as emissions from thermally pulsating asymptotic giant branch stars or molecular absorptions from cool stars.

Related

  1. Type Ia supernova population machine – I. A unified cosmological simulation–binary synthesis framework establishing non-universal delay-time distributions and cosmic progenitor-channel dominance crossover
    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0High-energy astrophysicsOUP
  2. What sets the star-formation rate in the Milky Way?. II. Comparing the star-forming clumps from simulations and observations
    Paolo Suin, Patrick Hennebelle, Georges Abboudeh +13
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGalaxiesarXiv
  3. Comparing gravitational wave background predictions from cosmological simulations to pulsar timing observations
    Stephanie Buttigieg, Debora Sijacki, Christopher J. Moore +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGalaxiesarXiv
  4. Multi-wavelength polarization degree dependence of Mrk 421 for different particle energy distributions
    Hritwik Bora, Ranjeev Misra, Rupjyoti Gogoi
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsarXiv
  5. Dark matter density profiles of the Milky Way satellite population: Reconciling simulations and observations
    J. Sarrato-Alós, J. M. Arroyo-Polonio
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
BibTeX
@article{lee2026comparing,
  title = {{Comparing the Near-infrared Spectral Energy Distributions from Different Stellar Population Synthesis Models with SPHEREx Observations}},
  author = {Jeong Hwan Lee and Minjin Kim and Woong-Seob Jeong and Yujin Yang and Daniel C. Masters and Kyuseok Oh and Bomee Lee and Olivier Doré and Zhaoyu Huai and Yun-Ting Cheng and Richard M. Feder and Michael Zemcov and Yongjung Kim and Dohyeong Kim and Jong-Hak Woo and Andreas L. Faisst and Howard Hui and Brendan P. Crill and Chi H. Nguyen and Asantha Cooray and Tzu-Ching Chang},
  journal = {The Astrophysical Journal},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aeb023},
  url = {https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aeb023},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparing the Near-infrared Spectral Energy Distributions from Different Stellar Population Synthesis Models with SPHEREx Observations
AU  - Jeong Hwan Lee
AU  - Minjin Kim
AU  - Woong-Seob Jeong
AU  - Yujin Yang
AU  - Daniel C. Masters
AU  - Kyuseok Oh
AU  - Bomee Lee
AU  - Olivier Doré
AU  - Zhaoyu Huai
AU  - Yun-Ting Cheng
AU  - Richard M. Feder
AU  - Michael Zemcov
AU  - Yongjung Kim
AU  - Dohyeong Kim
AU  - Jong-Hak Woo
AU  - Andreas L. Faisst
AU  - Howard Hui
AU  - Brendan P. Crill
AU  - Chi H. Nguyen
AU  - Asantha Cooray
AU  - Tzu-Ching Chang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
JO  - The Astrophysical Journal
DO  - 10.3847/1538-4357/aeb023
UR  - https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aeb023
AB  - While stellar population synthesis (SPS) models have been widely used for spectral analysis in optical wavelengths, their characteristics remain uncertain in the near-infrared (NIR) due to a relative lack of observed NIR spectra. The spectrophotometric data from SPHEREx are well-suited for investigating the performance of SPS models in the NIR, thanks to its wide wavelength coverage over 0.75–5.0 μ m. In this work, we compare the observed SPHEREx data of SDSS compact galaxies, including 2726 non-emission-line galaxies and 1163 emission-line galaxies, to the NIR SEDs predicted from the full spectrum fitting of SDSS optical spectra. We use four different SPS models that extend into the NIR: E-MILES, Bruzual & Charlot (BC03), Charlot & Bruzual (CB19), and FSPS. We find that all four models tend to overpredict the stellar continuum at 2.4–5 μ m by 0.1–0.3 mag. This trend is particularly prominent for intermediate-age stellar populations (∼1–5 Gyr), suggesting a systematic bias in the NIR SED predictions of current SPS models. For stellar populations older than 5 Gyr, E-MILES shows relatively smaller offsets at 3.8–5 μ m compared to other models. Meanwhile, for emission-line galaxies, the SPS models underestimate the SED by up to ∼0.5 mag at longer wavelengths due to the contribution of nonstellar emission. Overall, these results highlight the necessity of refining the NIR stellar spectral features in SPS models, such as emissions from thermally pulsating asymptotic giant branch stars or molecular absorptions from cool stars.
SN  - 1538-4357
SN  - 0004-637X
ER  -