Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Radiance-Invariance Evaluation of a Compact LED-Based Source for Imager Radiance Transfer

  1. 1QUEL Imaging

Abstract

Significance: Fluorescence imaging remains largely qualitative and device-specific, limiting reproducibility and intersystem comparisons. SI-traceable radiometric characterization requires calibrated sources suitable for transferring known radiance to imaging systems. Aim: Establish and evaluate a compact, calibrated solid-state radiometric emitter target (RET) for SI-traceable radiance transfer, and assess methods for evaluating radiance invariance, imager responsivity, and extension of radiance transfer to digitally defined regions of interest (ROIs). Approach: The radiance invariance of an LED-based RET was evaluated by measuring its radiance across varying source-to-aperture distances and collection apertures. A previously described radiance-transfer formalism based on calibrated source radiance and collection geometry was implemented to determine imager responsivity (R{lambda}), which was evaluated across varying working distances and lens apertures. Grubbs and MAD outlier tests and one-way ANOVA were used to assess radiance and responsivity invariance. Finally, responsivity obtained using digitally defined ROIs was compared with matched physical apertures to assess ROI-based radiance transfer. Results: The measured RET radiance remained invariant across the tested source-to-aperture distances and collection apertures, with no significant differences observed across distance (p = 0.88) or aperture (p = 0.15). Imager responsivity remained stable across working distances for both tested lens configurations (p = 0.48 and p > 0.99). Responsivity was also invariant across lens apertures, except for deviations at f/11 that were consistent with practical aperture tolerances. Digitally defined ROIs reproduced responsivity values obtained using matched physical apertures, demonstrating that the radiance-transfer approach can be extended to image-defined regions. Conclusions: The presented methods provide an approach for evaluating compact LED-based sources for invariant-radiance emission and suitability for SI-traceable radiance transfer. The characterized RET supported stable imager responsivity across changes in imaging geometry and extension to digitally defined ROIs. These methods can be adapted to other LED-based sources, with further angular characterization and uncertainty analysis needed to establish broader applicability.

Related

  1. Mangrove taxon mapping from Sentinel-1/2 using a compact one-dimensional network with probability calibration, predictive entropy, and frozen transfer evaluation
    Guohao Liu, Shulei Wu, Yaoru Wang +5
    Frontiers in Plant SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPlant biologyCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  2. Intact-to-Amputee Transfer in Surface-EMG Gesture Decoding: Training Source and Calibration Budget
    Jethro Odeyemi, W. J. Zhang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencearXiv
  3. Horizontal gene transfer rivals gene duplication as a source of anti-parasitoid immune innovation in the Drosophilidae
    R. L. Tarnopol, R. L. Wang, B. Y. Kim +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textEvolutionary biologybioRxiv
  4. Evaluation of spatiotemporal patterns and uncertainty of multi-source remote sensing GPP products in the Southwest karst region of China
    Huanqiang Dong, Linna Wu, Xiaomei Li +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEcologyCrossref
  5. Layer-Specific Source-Anchored Transfer Learning for Multi-Omics Survival Prediction in Younger Breast Cancer Patients
    W. Guo, B. Wang, C. Tatsuoka
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{ruiz2026radianceinvariance,
  title = {{Radiance-Invariance Evaluation of a Compact LED-Based Source for Imager Radiance Transfer}},
  author = {A. J. Ruiz and E. A. Robledo and E. A. Littler},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.27.754831},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.27.754831v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Radiance-Invariance Evaluation of a Compact LED-Based Source for Imager Radiance Transfer
AU  - A. J. Ruiz
AU  - E. A. Robledo
AU  - E. A. Littler
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/27
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.27.754831
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.27.754831v1
AB  - Significance: Fluorescence imaging remains largely qualitative and device-specific, limiting reproducibility and intersystem comparisons. SI-traceable radiometric characterization requires calibrated sources suitable for transferring known radiance to imaging systems. Aim: Establish and evaluate a compact, calibrated solid-state radiometric emitter target (RET) for SI-traceable radiance transfer, and assess methods for evaluating radiance invariance, imager responsivity, and extension of radiance transfer to digitally defined regions of interest (ROIs). Approach: The radiance invariance of an LED-based RET was evaluated by measuring its radiance across varying source-to-aperture distances and collection apertures. A previously described radiance-transfer formalism based on calibrated source radiance and collection geometry was implemented to determine imager responsivity (R{lambda}), which was evaluated across varying working distances and lens apertures. Grubbs and MAD outlier tests and one-way ANOVA were used to assess radiance and responsivity invariance. Finally, responsivity obtained using digitally defined ROIs was compared with matched physical apertures to assess ROI-based radiance transfer. Results: The measured RET radiance remained invariant across the tested source-to-aperture distances and collection apertures, with no significant differences observed across distance (p = 0.88) or aperture (p = 0.15). Imager responsivity remained stable across working distances for both tested lens configurations (p = 0.48 and p > 0.99). Responsivity was also invariant across lens apertures, except for deviations at f/11 that were consistent with practical aperture tolerances. Digitally defined ROIs reproduced responsivity values obtained using matched physical apertures, demonstrating that the radiance-transfer approach can be extended to image-defined regions. Conclusions: The presented methods provide an approach for evaluating compact LED-based sources for invariant-radiance emission and suitability for SI-traceable radiance transfer. The characterized RET supported stable imager responsivity across changes in imaging geometry and extension to digitally defined ROIs. These methods can be adapted to other LED-based sources, with further angular characterization and uncertainty analysis needed to establish broader applicability.
ER  -