Swedish Consensus Recommendation for Follow‐Up After ICU Stay
9 affiliations
- 1Department of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden
- 2Department of Health Sciences Lunds University Lund Sweden
- 3Department of Perioperative and Intensive Care Södersjukhuset Stockholm Sweden
- 4Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
- 5Institute of Health and Care Sciences at Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden
- 6Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care West Hospital Kungälv Sweden
- 7Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society Karolinska Institute Stockholm Sweden
- 8Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Linköping University Hospital Linköping Sweden
- 9Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Linköping University Linköping Sweden
Abstract
Background: A substantial proportion of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors experience long‐term physical, psychological and cognitive impairments after critical illness. However, methods for identifying patients in need of post‐ICU support vary widely. As a result, many patients are left without access to established rehabilitation pathways. This consensus recommendation provides a framework for the organisation and content of follow‐up for adult ICU survivors in Sweden, informed by available evidence, stakeholder perspectives and expert consensus.
Methods: The National System for Knowledge‐Driven Healthcare Management (NPO) in Sweden commissioned the development of a practice recommendation for the follow‐up of critically ill adults. Multidisciplinary experts in ICU survivorship formed a task force group. A systematic literature search in four databases was conducted in 2024 to identify pre‐existing systematic reviews on the topic. The literature was reviewed, assessed for quality and recommendations were developed based on the literature evidence. The draft was discussed among multiprofessional groups involved in follow‐up, in workshops with critical care nurses (n = 30) and professionals responsible for follow‐up clinics (n = 74) and among patient representatives (n = 4). The final draft underwent external peer review by representatives from relevant professional organisations, the national registry for intensive care and governmental agencies in Sweden.
Results: The consensus recommendation suggests that all adult patients with an ICU length of stay ≥ 48 h are recommended for follow‐up, with an initial contact within 1 week of ICU discharge to assess clinical status, identify early problems and ensure continuity of care. Patients and their families are recommended to be offered an outpatient follow‐up visit at 2–3 months after discharge, led by ICU clinicians and, when possible, delivered by a multidisciplinary team. Validated screening tools and objective tests are recommended to assess relevant outcomes, including post‐traumatic stress, anxiety, depression, cognitive impairment, physical function and Health‐Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as appropriate. Patients with identified problems should be referred to appropriate healthcare providers or specialist services for further management.
Conclusion: This consensus recommendation provides a framework for patient selection, timing and assessment to support a more structured and equitable management of post‐intensive care syndrome.
Editorial Comment: Systematic follow up of ICU survivors after hospital discharge is needed in order to assess long‐term patient‐centred outcomes. This is a consensus set of recommendations and not a GRADE‐based clinical practice guideline for doing this, which can be considered by relevant ICUs.
Related
- Long-term implant integrity and complications after risk-reducing mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study with prospective ultrasound follow-up at a Swedish university hospital
- Cohort profile: the Swedish Evaluation Through Follow-up Study of Learning Later in Life (UGU-LIFE)
- Colchicine Use Is Associated with Shorter ICU Stay and Lower FFP Transfusion Requirements After CABG
- Factors associated with prolonged postoperative hospital stay after cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in a Peruvian emergency hospital.
- Written Recommendation to Repeat Colonoscopy within 1 Year after Inadequate Bowel Preparation: A Simple and Highly Effective Intervention.
BibTeX
@article{akerman2026swedish,
title = {{Swedish Consensus Recommendation for Follow‐Up After ICU Stay}},
author = {Eva Åkerman and Anna Schandl and Mona Ringdal and Oili Dahl and Lotti Orwelius},
journal = {Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1111/aas.70361},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70361},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Swedish Consensus Recommendation for Follow‐Up After ICU Stay
AU - Eva Åkerman
AU - Anna Schandl
AU - Mona Ringdal
AU - Oili Dahl
AU - Lotti Orwelius
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/25
JO - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
DO - 10.1111/aas.70361
UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70361
AB - Background: A substantial proportion of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors experience long‐term physical, psychological and cognitive impairments after critical illness. However, methods for identifying patients in need of post‐ICU support vary widely. As a result, many patients are left without access to established rehabilitation pathways. This consensus recommendation provides a framework for the organisation and content of follow‐up for adult ICU survivors in Sweden, informed by available evidence, stakeholder perspectives and expert consensus. Methods: The National System for Knowledge‐Driven Healthcare Management (NPO) in Sweden commissioned the development of a practice recommendation for the follow‐up of critically ill adults. Multidisciplinary experts in ICU survivorship formed a task force group. A systematic literature search in four databases was conducted in 2024 to identify pre‐existing systematic reviews on the topic. The literature was reviewed, assessed for quality and recommendations were developed based on the literature evidence. The draft was discussed among multiprofessional groups involved in follow‐up, in workshops with critical care nurses (n = 30) and professionals responsible for follow‐up clinics (n = 74) and among patient representatives (n = 4). The final draft underwent external peer review by representatives from relevant professional organisations, the national registry for intensive care and governmental agencies in Sweden. Results: The consensus recommendation suggests that all adult patients with an ICU length of stay ≥ 48 h are recommended for follow‐up, with an initial contact within 1 week of ICU discharge to assess clinical status, identify early problems and ensure continuity of care. Patients and their families are recommended to be offered an outpatient follow‐up visit at 2–3 months after discharge, led by ICU clinicians and, when possible, delivered by a multidisciplinary team. Validated screening tools and objective tests are recommended to assess relevant outcomes, including post‐traumatic stress, anxiety, depression, cognitive impairment, physical function and Health‐Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as appropriate. Patients with identified problems should be referred to appropriate healthcare providers or specialist services for further management. Conclusion: This consensus recommendation provides a framework for patient selection, timing and assessment to support a more structured and equitable management of post‐intensive care syndrome. Editorial Comment: Systematic follow up of ICU survivors after hospital discharge is needed in order to assess long‐term patient‐centred outcomes. This is a consensus set of recommendations and not a GRADE‐based clinical practice guideline for doing this, which can be considered by relevant ICUs.
SN - 0001-5172
SN - 1399-6576
ER -