Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,578 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0ACS Omega

Machine Learning-Driven Comparative Prediction of Compressive Strength in True Geopolymer and Hybrid Alkali-Activated Cement Systems

  1. 1Qatar University , , P.O. Box , ,

Abstract

Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) production accounts for approximately 7–8% of global CO2 emissions, motivating the development of sustainable binders such as metakaolin-based geopolymers and hybrid alkali-activated cements (AACs). However, accurate prediction of compressive strength in these systems remains challenging because of nonlinear interactions among precursor composition, activator chemistry, water-related parameters, and curing conditions. This study develops a reliability-oriented machine-learning framework using literature-derived datasets comprising 223 metakaolin-based geopolymer mixtures and 262 hybrid AAC mixtures. Five tree-based ensemble algorithms were evaluated using five-fold GroupKFold validation, with literature source used as the grouping variable to reduce the risk of study-level information leakage. The framework further incorporated fold-wise hyperparameter optimization, inverse-frequency sample weighting during model fitting, source-wise sensitivity analysis, and leave-one-source-out evaluation. Under grouped internal validation, CatBoost achieved the best performance for the metakaolin-based geopolymer dataset (R2 = 0.8211 ± 0.1275, RMSE = 5.773 ± 2.333 MPa, MAE = 4.131 ± 1.543 MPa), whereas Gradient Boosting performed best for the hybrid AAC dataset (R2 = 0.8876 ± 0.0708, RMSE = 3.333 ± 1.181 MPa, MAE = 2.366 ± 0.737 MPa). TreeSHAP analysis revealed distinct model-derived feature associations: hybrid AAC predictions were most strongly associated with GGBFS content, followed by activator- and curing-related variables, whereas metakaolin-based geopolymer predictions were most strongly associated with the H2O/Na2O ratio, aggregate proportion, activator chemistry, and curing conditions. These SHAP-derived patterns represent statistical associations learned by the models rather than direct evidence of physical causation or reaction mechanisms. Overall, the proposed framework provides a transparent approach for preliminary compressive-strength screening and experimental prioritization of sustainable alkali-activated binders.

Related

  1. Prediction model for compressive strength of alkali-activated multi-source solid-waste grouting materials based on generative adversarial networks and machine learning
    Qiang Yue, Guangming Yu, Yong Yao +4
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersStatisticsPLOS
  2. Integrated Silica-Encapsulated Lauric Acid Phase Change Material into Acid-Activated Geopolymer for Thermal Energy Storage Applications
    Yann Boland, Léa Deville, Serge Bourbigot +2
    Journal of Oleo SciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryJ-STAGE
  3. Curing regime controlled performance of basalt-modified alkali activated slag: phase composition, porosity profile, microstructure and compressive strength
    Musa A. Said, M. Ramadan, Fatma. M. Helmy +7
    RSC advancesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryEurope PMCPMC
  4. Humidity-dependent formaldehyde adsorption on porous frameworks: A comparative study of MOFs, zeolites, and activated carbon
    Marie Froehly, Anaïs Becker, Gérald Chaplais +3
    Next MaterialsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  5. Understanding the Relationship Between Synthetic Conditions and H ₂ Uptake Capacity in Oxidatively Activated Turbostratic Carbons through Machine Learning
    L Scott Blankenship, Filippo Federici Canova, David Gao +1
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersChemRxiv
BibTeX
@article{keloth2026machine,
  title = {{Machine Learning-Driven Comparative Prediction of Compressive Strength in True Geopolymer and Hybrid Alkali-Activated Cement Systems}},
  author = {Jafla Thekke Keloth and Nasser Al Nuaimi and Mohammed Z. E. B. Elshafie and Ibnelwaleed A. Hussein},
  journal = {ACS Omega},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1021/acsomega.6c07604},
  url = {https://pubs.acs.org/acsodf/article/doi/10.1021/acsomega.6c07604/5463999/Machine-Learning-Driven-Comparative-Prediction-of},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Machine Learning-Driven Comparative Prediction of Compressive Strength in True Geopolymer and Hybrid Alkali-Activated Cement Systems
AU  - Jafla Thekke Keloth
AU  - Nasser Al Nuaimi
AU  - Mohammed Z. E. B. Elshafie
AU  - Ibnelwaleed A. Hussein
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
JO  - ACS Omega
DO  - 10.1021/acsomega.6c07604
UR  - https://pubs.acs.org/acsodf/article/doi/10.1021/acsomega.6c07604/5463999/Machine-Learning-Driven-Comparative-Prediction-of
AB  - Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) production accounts for approximately 7–8% of global CO2 emissions, motivating the development of sustainable binders such as metakaolin-based geopolymers and hybrid alkali-activated cements (AACs). However, accurate prediction of compressive strength in these systems remains challenging because of nonlinear interactions among precursor composition, activator chemistry, water-related parameters, and curing conditions. This study develops a reliability-oriented machine-learning framework using literature-derived datasets comprising 223 metakaolin-based geopolymer mixtures and 262 hybrid AAC mixtures. Five tree-based ensemble algorithms were evaluated using five-fold GroupKFold validation, with literature source used as the grouping variable to reduce the risk of study-level information leakage. The framework further incorporated fold-wise hyperparameter optimization, inverse-frequency sample weighting during model fitting, source-wise sensitivity analysis, and leave-one-source-out evaluation. Under grouped internal validation, CatBoost achieved the best performance for the metakaolin-based geopolymer dataset (R2 = 0.8211 ± 0.1275, RMSE = 5.773 ± 2.333 MPa, MAE = 4.131 ± 1.543 MPa), whereas Gradient Boosting performed best for the hybrid AAC dataset (R2 = 0.8876 ± 0.0708, RMSE = 3.333 ± 1.181 MPa, MAE = 2.366 ± 0.737 MPa). TreeSHAP analysis revealed distinct model-derived feature associations: hybrid AAC predictions were most strongly associated with GGBFS content, followed by activator- and curing-related variables, whereas metakaolin-based geopolymer predictions were most strongly associated with the H2O/Na2O ratio, aggregate proportion, activator chemistry, and curing conditions. These SHAP-derived patterns represent statistical associations learned by the models rather than direct evidence of physical causation or reaction mechanisms. Overall, the proposed framework provides a transparent approach for preliminary compressive-strength screening and experimental prioritization of sustainable alkali-activated binders.
SN  - 2470-1343
ER  -