Depressive symptoms and occupational correlates among psychiatric nurses in northern Jiangsu: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study
- 1Department of Nursing, Huai’an No.3 People’s Hospital, Huaian Second Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University
- 2Department of Bipolar Disorders, Huai’an No.3 People’s Hospital, Huaian Second Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University
- 3Department of Intensive Psychiatry, Huai’an No.3 People’s Hospital, Huaian Second Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University
Abstract
Background: Psychiatric nurses manage aggression, interrupted recovery and emotionally demanding care. Surveys quantify distress but rarely show how these experiences accumulate during routine work.
Aim: We aimed to estimate the prevalence of a positive depressive-symptom screen among psychiatric nurses and to quantify its associations with four prespecified occupational exposures: workplace violence, night-shift burden, occupational strain and psychological resilience. A longitudinal qualitative phase then examined how nurses experienced these same exposures during routine work.
Methods: Four tertiary public psychiatric hospitals in northern Jiangsu participated from January 2025 to March 2026. A convenience sample of 357 nurses completed the survey. Workplace violence during the preceding 12 months was assessed with Wang’s Workplace Violence Scale; at least one physical, verbal or psychological, or sexual incident perpetrated by a psychiatric inpatient or visiting family member defined exposure. Modified Poisson regression with hospital fixed effects estimated prevalence ratios (PRs) for an SDS-positive screen. A purposive subsample of 20 nurses completed interviews, diaries and observation over three months. Colaizzi’s method and a joint display supported qualitative analysis and integration.
Results: Of 357 nurses, 138 (38.7%) screened positive. Nurses reporting violence had a higher screening prevalence (PR 1.65, 95% CI 1.31–2.08). PRs per SD were 1.48 (95% CI 1.33–1.66) for night-shift burden and 1.45 (95% CI 1.28–1.65) for occupational strain. Resilience showed the opposite pattern (PR 0.79 per SD, 95% CI 0.70–0.88). Qualitative accounts centered on repeated strain, a value–recognition mismatch, unequal recovery resources and support considered generic or poorly timed.
Conclusions: Depressive symptoms were common. Nurses identified practical targets: safer work organization, rapid post-incident contact and support tailored to individual circumstances. Cross-sectional estimates do not establish diagnosis or causation.
Related
- Frequency and correlates of inaccurate psychiatric diagnoses in 401 adults hospitalized for major depressive disorder: a comparison of clinical versus research interview-based diagnoses
- Perceived factors influencing healthcare professionals’ adherence to the ABCDE approach: an exploratory explanatory sequential mixed-methods study
- Knowledge, perceptions, and associated factors of marburg virus disease in selected towns and districts of the South Ethiopia Region: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study
- Understanding Black Women’s Lived Experiences of Medical Mistrust and Trust in the Reproductive Care Setting: a nested sequential explanatory mixed methods study
- Community Health Nurses’ Perceptions of Emerging Artificial Intelligence and its Impact on Nursing Practice: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study
BibTeX
@article{han2026depressive,
title = {{Depressive symptoms and occupational correlates among psychiatric nurses in northern Jiangsu: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study}},
author = {Yan Han and Jie He and Qian Wang and Yan Tang},
journal = {Frontiers in Psychiatry},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1967611},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1967611/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Depressive symptoms and occupational correlates among psychiatric nurses in northern Jiangsu: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study
AU - Yan Han
AU - Jie He
AU - Qian Wang
AU - Yan Tang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - Frontiers in Psychiatry
DO - 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1967611
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1967611/full
AB - Background: Psychiatric nurses manage aggression, interrupted recovery and emotionally demanding care. Surveys quantify distress but rarely show how these experiences accumulate during routine work. Aim: We aimed to estimate the prevalence of a positive depressive-symptom screen among psychiatric nurses and to quantify its associations with four prespecified occupational exposures: workplace violence, night-shift burden, occupational strain and psychological resilience. A longitudinal qualitative phase then examined how nurses experienced these same exposures during routine work. Methods: Four tertiary public psychiatric hospitals in northern Jiangsu participated from January 2025 to March 2026. A convenience sample of 357 nurses completed the survey. Workplace violence during the preceding 12 months was assessed with Wang’s Workplace Violence Scale; at least one physical, verbal or psychological, or sexual incident perpetrated by a psychiatric inpatient or visiting family member defined exposure. Modified Poisson regression with hospital fixed effects estimated prevalence ratios (PRs) for an SDS-positive screen. A purposive subsample of 20 nurses completed interviews, diaries and observation over three months. Colaizzi’s method and a joint display supported qualitative analysis and integration. Results: Of 357 nurses, 138 (38.7%) screened positive. Nurses reporting violence had a higher screening prevalence (PR 1.65, 95% CI 1.31–2.08). PRs per SD were 1.48 (95% CI 1.33–1.66) for night-shift burden and 1.45 (95% CI 1.28–1.65) for occupational strain. Resilience showed the opposite pattern (PR 0.79 per SD, 95% CI 0.70–0.88). Qualitative accounts centered on repeated strain, a value–recognition mismatch, unequal recovery resources and support considered generic or poorly timed. Conclusions: Depressive symptoms were common. Nurses identified practical targets: safer work organization, rapid post-incident contact and support tailored to individual circumstances. Cross-sectional estimates do not establish diagnosis or causation.
SN - 1664-0640
ER -