Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,851 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Mean Gain Is Not a Guarantee: Risk-Controlled Open-Loop Scheduling for Ka-Band LEO Semantic Downlinks

Abstract

A low-Earth-orbit satellite has only minutes to downlink imagery on a limited power budget, and some moments in a pass carry far better channels than others. Spending more power on the good moments and skipping hopeless ones should deliver more images, but the channel cannot be measured in time, so the schedule is planned in advance from weather statistics using a safety margin. That margin is sized so the forecast is statistically reliable, and the scheduler is judged by whether it beats uniform power on average. Both targets are wrong for a satellite that gets one attempt per pass: on real Sentinel-2 imagery, a scheduler gaining one to two images per pass on average still delivers fewer than uniform power on a quarter to a third of individual passes, and a genie knowing the weather exactly does no better. We instead size the margin by measuring, on recorded passes, how often it would have backfired, keeping only settings that provably backfire rarely. The procedure declines to schedule our learned codec and certifies scheduling for codecs with a sharper cliff.

Related

  1. Prediction-Driven Non-Preemptive Scheduling with Bounded Overtaking: A Per-Job Wait Guarantee
    Yazhou Guo, Zexin Lin, Chengyang Huo +1
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
  2. Optimal Receive Design on the Observation Axis for RSMA Satellite-UAV Downlinks
    Xianwei Meng
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  3. Existence of exhaustions with controlled sign of mean curvature in noncompact manifolds
    Anushree Das
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  4. The Well-Posedness and Attainability of an LQ Optimal Control Problem for Mean-Field Linear Stochastic Systems Controlled by Impulses
    Vasile Drăgan, Ivan Ganchev Ivanov
    AxiomsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
  5. PL conditions do not guarantee convergence of gradient descent-ascent dynamics
    Jean-Christophe Mourrat
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlHAL
BibTeX
@misc{bafarassat2026mean,
  title = {{Mean Gain Is Not a Guarantee: Risk-Controlled Open-Loop Scheduling for Ka-Band LEO Semantic Downlinks}},
  author = {Milad Bafarassat},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.08635},
  eprint = {2608.08635},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.08635},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Mean Gain Is Not a Guarantee: Risk-Controlled Open-Loop Scheduling for Ka-Band LEO Semantic Downlinks
AU  - Milad Bafarassat
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/09
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.08635
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.08635
AB  - A low-Earth-orbit satellite has only minutes to downlink imagery on a limited power budget, and some moments in a pass carry far better channels than others. Spending more power on the good moments and skipping hopeless ones should deliver more images, but the channel cannot be measured in time, so the schedule is planned in advance from weather statistics using a safety margin. That margin is sized so the forecast is statistically reliable, and the scheduler is judged by whether it beats uniform power on average. Both targets are wrong for a satellite that gets one attempt per pass: on real Sentinel-2 imagery, a scheduler gaining one to two images per pass on average still delivers fewer than uniform power on a quarter to a third of individual passes, and a genie knowing the weather exactly does no better. We instead size the margin by measuring, on recorded passes, how often it would have backfired, keeping only settings that provably backfire rarely. The procedure declines to schedule our learned codec and certifies scheduling for codecs with a sharper cliff.
ER  -