From listening to action: how social and behavioral evidence informed multisectoral cholera response in Zambia, 2023–2024
8 affiliations
- 1Anthrologica Ltd , ,
- 2UNICEF Country Office , ,
- 3Department of Health Promotion and Education, The University of Zambia , ,
- 4Ministry of Health , ,
- 5United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Global Programme Division , ,
- 6International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), Africa Regional Office , ,
- 7International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), Country Cluster Delegation for Zimbabwe, Zambia and Malawi , ,
- 8(Formerly of) Risk Communication Community Engagement (RCCE) Collective Service , ,
Abstract
Rapid qualitative assessments and community feedback mechanisms are increasingly recognized as core components of risk communication and community engagement in public health emergencies, yet few documented examples exist of how this evidence has directly influenced outbreak response decision-making. This case study examines the 2023–2024 cholera outbreak in Zambia, analyzing how social and behavioral data generated through multiple rounds of rapid qualitative assessment, alongside national community feedback mechanisms, informed multisectoral response activities. Drawing on document review, consultations with response pillar members, assessment reports, feedback dashboards, and triangulation with epidemiological data, the study traces how community concerns, rumors, beliefs, perceptions and priorities were collected, analyzed and applied across health, water, sanitation and hygiene, and protection response pillars. Enabling factors included pre-existing technical capacity, strong partnerships between government humanitarian actors, and academia, and rapid feedback loops that supported near real-time adaptation. Challenges at different points in the response included delayed resource allocation, uneven subnational coordination, and limited capacity to process large volumes of feedback data. The Zambia experience demonstrates that community-generated evidence can meaningfully influence outbreak response when integrated across response pillars rather than confined to behavioral interventions alone, representing a broader shift in public health practice that positions community perspectives as central to decision-making. This, in turn, strengthens effectiveness, trust, accountability, and transparency by aligning interventions with community-identified priorities. While grounded in the Zambian context, the findings are relevant for preparedness, anticipatory action, and response across a range of public health emergencies.
Related
- Preparedness for Human Infections With Emerging Zoonotic Influenza Viruses: History, Continuing Risk, and the Need for Multisectoral Rapid Response Training
- Refined anatomy-based fitting reduces interaural place mismatch and improves speech outcomes, with preliminary evidence for reduced listening effort
- The Master Adaptive Learner Behavioral Assessment Scale (MAL BAS): Development, Validity Evidence, Feasibility, and Acceptability of a New Instrument
- Researchers Behavioral Intentions to Engage in Knowledge Translation Activities and Their Association with Bibliometric Indicators: A Theory of Planned Behavior-Informed Questionnaire Study
- Acute Social Stress Potentiates Cue-Driven Behavior in Alcohol Use Disorder: Behavioral and Neural Evidence
BibTeX
@article{karam2026from,
title = {{From listening to action: how social and behavioral evidence informed multisectoral cholera response in Zambia, 2023–2024}},
author = {Soha Karam and Nadia Butler and Tikulirekuti Banda and Hanna Woldemeskel and Oliver Mweemba and Mulanda Joseph Mulawa and Kalangwa Kalangwa and Leslie Jones and Anastasiia Atif and Elisabeth Ganter Restrepo and Yves Ngaleu and Maureen McKenna and Rachel James and Juliet Bedford and Helen Smith},
journal = {Frontiers in public health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1895133},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13690732},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - From listening to action: how social and behavioral evidence informed multisectoral cholera response in Zambia, 2023–2024
AU - Soha Karam
AU - Nadia Butler
AU - Tikulirekuti Banda
AU - Hanna Woldemeskel
AU - Oliver Mweemba
AU - Mulanda Joseph Mulawa
AU - Kalangwa Kalangwa
AU - Leslie Jones
AU - Anastasiia Atif
AU - Elisabeth Ganter Restrepo
AU - Yves Ngaleu
AU - Maureen McKenna
AU - Rachel James
AU - Juliet Bedford
AU - Helen Smith
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/09
JO - Frontiers in public health
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1895133
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13690732
AB - Rapid qualitative assessments and community feedback mechanisms are increasingly recognized as core components of risk communication and community engagement in public health emergencies, yet few documented examples exist of how this evidence has directly influenced outbreak response decision-making. This case study examines the 2023–2024 cholera outbreak in Zambia, analyzing how social and behavioral data generated through multiple rounds of rapid qualitative assessment, alongside national community feedback mechanisms, informed multisectoral response activities. Drawing on document review, consultations with response pillar members, assessment reports, feedback dashboards, and triangulation with epidemiological data, the study traces how community concerns, rumors, beliefs, perceptions and priorities were collected, analyzed and applied across health, water, sanitation and hygiene, and protection response pillars. Enabling factors included pre-existing technical capacity, strong partnerships between government humanitarian actors, and academia, and rapid feedback loops that supported near real-time adaptation. Challenges at different points in the response included delayed resource allocation, uneven subnational coordination, and limited capacity to process large volumes of feedback data. The Zambia experience demonstrates that community-generated evidence can meaningfully influence outbreak response when integrated across response pillars rather than confined to behavioral interventions alone, representing a broader shift in public health practice that positions community perspectives as central to decision-making. This, in turn, strengthens effectiveness, trust, accountability, and transparency by aligning interventions with community-identified priorities. While grounded in the Zambian context, the findings are relevant for preparedness, anticipatory action, and response across a range of public health emergencies.
SN - 2296-2565
ER -