Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,164 studies31 sourcesUpdated 28 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJHLT Open

Lung transplantation outcomes in candidates aged ≥ 70 years old: A 10-year single center experience

5 affiliations
  1. 1Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute/Corewell Health West, Grand Rapids, MI; Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI
  2. 2Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI
  3. 3Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute/Corewell Health West, Grand Rapids, MI
  4. 4Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute/Corewell Health West, Grand Rapids, MI; Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI; Richard DeVos Lung Transplant Program, Corewell Health West, Grand Rapids, MI
  5. 5Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute/Corewell Health West, Grand Rapids, MI; Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI; Richard DeVos Lung Transplant Program, Corewell Health West, Grand Rapids, MI; Corresponding author: Edward T. Murphy, MD, 221 Michigan NE, Suite 300, Grand Rapids, MI 49503.

Abstract

Background: The establishment of an upper age limit for lung transplantation remains controversial. Although the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation designates age over 65 as high risk, contemporary evidence demonstrates septuagenarians can achieve acceptable outcomes. This study aims to elucidate the outcomes in this older demographic compared to younger patients. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective review of all patients who received lung transplants over a 10-year period. Recipients were divided into two age groups: those under 70 and those 70 or older. The primary outcome was one-year survival, with secondary outcomes including three- and five-year survival, primary graft dysfunction, and acute kidney injury. Results: A total of 380 lung transplants were performed: 307 (81%) in patients < 70 and 73 (19%) in those ≥ 70 years old. The median age at transplant was 63 (59;67) years in the younger cohort and 72 (71;73) years in the older cohort. There were no differences between groups in gender (p = 0.08), BMI (p = 0.29), lung composite allocation subscore (p = 0.18), or lung allocation score (p = 0.08). A higher proportion of patients aged ≥ 70 years received single lung transplants (p = <0.001) and had a diagnosis of restrictive disease (p < 0.001). Postoperatively, there were no differences in length of stay (p = 0.43), primary graft dysfunction (p = 0.14), or acute kidney injury (p = 0.99) between cohorts. No differences were observed in the 1-year (0.96 [95% CI: 0.93 – 0.98] vs 0.94 [95% CI: 0.86 – 0.98]), 3-year (0.88 [95% CI: 0.83 – 0.91] vs 0.89 [95% CI: 0.79 – 0.95]), or 5-year (0.73 [95% CI: 0.66 – 0.78] vs 0.81 [95% CI: 0.67 – 0.90]) survival rates between patients under 70 and those 70 or older (Log rank: p = 0.62). Multivariable Cox regression identified higher creatinine (HR 4.56, 95% CI 1.74–11.95; p = 0.002) and pretransplant ECMO use (HR 3.85, 95% CI 1.27–11.70; p = 0.017) as independent predictors of mortality, while age ≥ 70 was not significantly associated with mortality (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.36–1.25; p = 0.206). Conclusion: Lung transplantation in patients aged ≥70 yields short- and long-term outcomes comparable to younger recipients, supporting expanded eligibility for carefully selected older candidates.

Related

  1. Early Outcomes of Dorsal Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty for Female Urethral Stricture Disease: A Single-Center Experience
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (MICS-CABG) Versus Conventional Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (OPCAB): A Single-Center Analysis of Early Outcomes and Institutional Experience
    Muhammad Yasir Khan
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Children with Sickle Cell Disease: A Single-Center Experience and Exploration of an Age Threshold for Post-Transplant Complications
    Charlotte Nazon, Chloé Gerber, Alexandra Salmon +6
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Single-center experience with Romiplostim N01 for the management of severe persistent cancer therapy-induced thrombocytopenia in lung cancer : Insights and outcomes
    Changjian Wang, Chuangyan Wu, Geng Wang +6
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Status Epilepticus in Children: Clinical Features, Management, and Outcomes in a Single-Center Experience
    Hamit Acer, Mehmet Canpolat, Hüseyin Per +3
    Iranian Journal of Child NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{jasonmaubrey2026lung,
  title = {{Lung transplantation outcomes in candidates aged ≥ 70 years old: A 10-year single center experience}},
  author = {Jason M. Aubrey, MD and Preetha Pamidighantam, MD and Stephen D. Thorp, MD and Isabelle Pokora, MS and Taylor Zimmer, MS and Cameron Lawson and Scott Chicotka, MD and Reda E. Girgis, MD and Tomasz Timek, MD PhD and Edward T. Murphy, MD},
  journal = {JHLT Open},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1016/j.jhlto.2026.100647},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlto.2026.100647},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Lung transplantation outcomes in candidates aged ≥ 70 years old: A 10-year single center experience
AU  - Jason M. Aubrey, MD
AU  - Preetha Pamidighantam, MD
AU  - Stephen D. Thorp, MD
AU  - Isabelle Pokora, MS
AU  - Taylor Zimmer, MS
AU  - Cameron Lawson
AU  - Scott Chicotka, MD
AU  - Reda E. Girgis, MD
AU  - Tomasz Timek, MD PhD
AU  - Edward T. Murphy, MD
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/05
JO  - JHLT Open
DO  - 10.1016/j.jhlto.2026.100647
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlto.2026.100647
AB  - Background: The establishment of an upper age limit for lung transplantation remains controversial. Although the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation designates age over 65 as high risk, contemporary evidence demonstrates septuagenarians can achieve acceptable outcomes. This study aims to elucidate the outcomes in this older demographic compared to younger patients. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective review of all patients who received lung transplants over a 10-year period. Recipients were divided into two age groups: those under 70 and those 70 or older. The primary outcome was one-year survival, with secondary outcomes including three- and five-year survival, primary graft dysfunction, and acute kidney injury. Results: A total of 380 lung transplants were performed: 307 (81%) in patients < 70 and 73 (19%) in those ≥ 70 years old. The median age at transplant was 63 (59;67) years in the younger cohort and 72 (71;73) years in the older cohort. There were no differences between groups in gender (p = 0.08), BMI (p = 0.29), lung composite allocation subscore (p = 0.18), or lung allocation score (p = 0.08). A higher proportion of patients aged ≥ 70 years received single lung transplants (p = <0.001) and had a diagnosis of restrictive disease (p < 0.001). Postoperatively, there were no differences in length of stay (p = 0.43), primary graft dysfunction (p = 0.14), or acute kidney injury (p = 0.99) between cohorts. No differences were observed in the 1-year (0.96 [95% CI: 0.93 – 0.98] vs 0.94 [95% CI: 0.86 – 0.98]), 3-year (0.88 [95% CI: 0.83 – 0.91] vs 0.89 [95% CI: 0.79 – 0.95]), or 5-year (0.73 [95% CI: 0.66 – 0.78] vs 0.81 [95% CI: 0.67 – 0.90]) survival rates between patients under 70 and those 70 or older (Log rank: p = 0.62). Multivariable Cox regression identified higher creatinine (HR 4.56, 95% CI 1.74–11.95; p = 0.002) and pretransplant ECMO use (HR 3.85, 95% CI 1.27–11.70; p = 0.017) as independent predictors of mortality, while age ≥ 70 was not significantly associated with mortality (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.36–1.25; p = 0.206). Conclusion: Lung transplantation in patients aged ≥70 yields short- and long-term outcomes comparable to younger recipients, supporting expanded eligibility for carefully selected older candidates.
SN  - 2950-1334
ER  -