Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Diabetes Therapy

Exit Interviews Examining Patient Experiences with Tirzepatide and Dulaglutide for Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in the SURPASS-CVOT Trial

  1. 1PPD Evidera Patient-Centered Research, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA
  2. 2Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA

Abstract

Introduction: Qualitative exit interviews with people who recently completed a clinical trial can provide in-depth insights into their treatment experience and the benefits they consider most meaningful. The purpose of this exit interview study was to examine the impact of long-term treatment with dulaglutide and tirzepatide from the perspective of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Methods: Interviews were conducted after participants completed treatment with either dulaglutide or tirzepatide in the multiyear SURPASS-CVOT clinical trial. Interviews were conducted by telephone or web-based conference using a semi-structured interview guide. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed following a content analysis approach.

Results: In total, 147 people were invited to participate in exit interviews across 10 US trial sites. A total of 74 participants were interviewed (63.5% male; mean age = 68.9 years), including 31 treated with dulaglutide and 43 treated with tirzepatide. Participants reported treatment benefits during the trial, such as improved glycemic control (97.3%), weight reduction (91.9%), reduced appetite (78.4%), improved diet and eating habits (64.9%), increased energy (56.8%), and decreased desire for unhealthy food (41.9%). Some also noted improvement in conditions other than T2D, including joint pain/osteoarthritis (18.9%) and sleep apnea (8.1%). Nearly all participants said these treatment-related changes were meaningful. Participants described improvements in quality of life and daily activities associated with treatment. The most commonly reported adverse event was nausea (28.4%). Most participants said they would be very likely (77.0%) or likely (16.2%) to recommend their treatment to others.

Conclusions: Exit interview results indicate that self-reported treatment benefits were important to people who received long-term treatment with dulaglutide or tirzepatide.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-026-01907-y.

Related

  1. A comparison of the effects of tirzepatide and dulaglutide on major kidney events in people with type 2 diabetes: pre-specified exploratory analyses of the SURPASS-CVOT trial
    Sophia Zoungas, David A. D’Alessio, Imre J. Pavo +21
    The Lancet Diabetes & EndocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BY11 citedEndocrinology & metabolismOpenAlex
  2. Caregivers’ experiences of PM2.5 prevention for preschool children in Thailand: a qualitative study with focus group interviews
    Kesinee Imman, Jutamas Ponmark, Surachai Wongcharee +1
    Child Health Nursing ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyPMC
  3. Patient Experiences of Chronic Low Back Pain: Development of a Conceptual Model Based on a Targeted Literature Review and Qualitative Patient Interviews
    Ekin Seçinti, Brittany Klooster, Rebecca Robinson +10
    Musculoskeletal CarePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyPMC
  4. Experiences of People with Type 2 Diabetes and Healthcare Professionals with Once-Weekly Insulin Efsitora Alfa in QWINT Phase 3 Trials: Qualitative In-Trial Interviews
    William H. Polonsky, Emma L. Low, Carla Dias-Barbosa +9
    The PatientPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismPMC
  5. Atypical Anorexia Nervosa Developed in a Patient with Severe Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Following Sleeve Gastrectomy and Postoperative Treatment with Semaglutide and Tirzepatide
    Chiaki Saito, Masahiro Saito, Masatoshi Nakagawa +7
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthJ-STAGE
BibTeX
@article{stewart2026exit,
  title = {{Exit Interviews Examining Patient Experiences with Tirzepatide and Dulaglutide for Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in the SURPASS-CVOT Trial}},
  author = {Katie D. Stewart and Louis S. Matza and Chanadda Chinthammit and Imre Pavo and Amy K. Bartee and Kristina S. Boye},
  journal = {Diabetes Therapy},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1007/s13300-026-01907-y},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-026-01907-y},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Exit Interviews Examining Patient Experiences with Tirzepatide and Dulaglutide for Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in the SURPASS-CVOT Trial
AU  - Katie D. Stewart
AU  - Louis S. Matza
AU  - Chanadda Chinthammit
AU  - Imre Pavo
AU  - Amy K. Bartee
AU  - Kristina S. Boye
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/17
JO  - Diabetes Therapy
DO  - 10.1007/s13300-026-01907-y
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-026-01907-y
AB  - Introduction: Qualitative exit interviews with people who recently completed a clinical trial can provide in-depth insights into their treatment experience and the benefits they consider most meaningful. The purpose of this exit interview study was to examine the impact of long-term treatment with dulaglutide and tirzepatide from the perspective of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.  Methods: Interviews were conducted after participants completed treatment with either dulaglutide or tirzepatide in the multiyear SURPASS-CVOT clinical trial. Interviews were conducted by telephone or web-based conference using a semi-structured interview guide. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed following a content analysis approach.  Results: In total, 147 people were invited to participate in exit interviews across 10 US trial sites. A total of 74 participants were interviewed (63.5% male; mean age = 68.9 years), including 31 treated with dulaglutide and 43 treated with tirzepatide. Participants reported treatment benefits during the trial, such as improved glycemic control (97.3%), weight reduction (91.9%), reduced appetite (78.4%), improved diet and eating habits (64.9%), increased energy (56.8%), and decreased desire for unhealthy food (41.9%). Some also noted improvement in conditions other than T2D, including joint pain/osteoarthritis (18.9%) and sleep apnea (8.1%). Nearly all participants said these treatment-related changes were meaningful. Participants described improvements in quality of life and daily activities associated with treatment. The most commonly reported adverse event was nausea (28.4%). Most participants said they would be very likely (77.0%) or likely (16.2%) to recommend their treatment to others.  Conclusions: Exit interview results indicate that self-reported treatment benefits were important to people who received long-term treatment with dulaglutide or tirzepatide.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-026-01907-y.
SN  - 1869-6953
SN  - 1869-6961
ER  -