Comparative evaluation of postfabrication thickness of thermoformed 3 mm and 4 mm mouthguards on crowded and proclined malocclusion models: An in vitro study
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate and compare the postfabrication thickness (PFT) of thermoformed mouthguards fabricated from 3 mm and 4 mm ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) sheets on crowded and proclined dental models. Materials and Methods: An in-vitro study was conducted using 20 mouthguards fabricated on dental stone models with crowded and proclined maxillary anterior teeth. Pressure-molded mouthguards were made using 3 mm and 4 mm EVA sheets. PFT was measured at standardized labial, buccal, and sulcus regions using an Iwanson caliper. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test, and unpaired t-test (P < 0.05). Results: Significant thickness reduction was observed in both 3 mm and 4 mm mouthguards. In crowded dentition, 42%–61% thinning occurred at labial surfaces and 53%–71% at the sulcus, while proclined dentition showed 40%–60% and 51%–67% thinning, respectively. Maximum thinning occurred at canines, whereas molars showed the least reduction. Conclusion: Thermoforming causes substantial reduction in mouthguard thickness, particularly in anterior regions. Dental alignment influences final thickness, and clinicians should consider postfabrication thinning when selecting EVA sheet thickness to ensure adequate protection.
Related
- Environmental noise pollution and its association with temporomandibular joint disorders, malocclusion, and bruxism: A Comparative cross-sectional study of adults in high-traffic and low- traffic areas
- Multidimensional patterns of malocclusion in treatment-seeking Turkish orthodontic patients : A retrospective cross-sectional study
- The influence of breastfeeding and pacifier use on the association between preterm birth and primary-dentition malocclusion: A population-based birth cohort study
- Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Model Interfaces in Third Molar Surgery Complication Scenarios: Response Quality, Clinical Content, Potential Clinical Risk, Readability, and Externally Observable Response Latency—A Cross-Sectional Comparative Benchmark Study
- Quality, Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of AI Chatbots’ Responses to Dental Patient Questions: A Comparative Evaluation
BibTeX
@article{kalaskar2026comparative,
title = {{Comparative evaluation of postfabrication thickness of thermoformed 3 mm and 4 mm mouthguards on crowded and proclined malocclusion models: An in vitro study}},
author = {Ritesh Kalaskar and Nidhi Sharma and Ashita Kalaskar},
journal = {Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_389_26},
url = {https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_389_26},
note = {CC BY-NC-SA},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Comparative evaluation of postfabrication thickness of thermoformed 3 mm and 4 mm mouthguards on crowded and proclined malocclusion models: An in vitro study
AU - Ritesh Kalaskar
AU - Nidhi Sharma
AU - Ashita Kalaskar
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/01
JO - Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
DO - 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_389_26
UR - https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_389_26
AB - Purpose: To evaluate and compare the postfabrication thickness (PFT) of thermoformed mouthguards fabricated from 3 mm and 4 mm ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) sheets on crowded and proclined dental models. Materials and Methods: An in-vitro study was conducted using 20 mouthguards fabricated on dental stone models with crowded and proclined maxillary anterior teeth. Pressure-molded mouthguards were made using 3 mm and 4 mm EVA sheets. PFT was measured at standardized labial, buccal, and sulcus regions using an Iwanson caliper. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test, and unpaired t-test (P < 0.05). Results: Significant thickness reduction was observed in both 3 mm and 4 mm mouthguards. In crowded dentition, 42%–61% thinning occurred at labial surfaces and 53%–71% at the sulcus, while proclined dentition showed 40%–60% and 51%–67% thinning, respectively. Maximum thinning occurred at canines, whereas molars showed the least reduction. Conclusion: Thermoforming causes substantial reduction in mouthguard thickness, particularly in anterior regions. Dental alignment influences final thickness, and clinicians should consider postfabrication thinning when selecting EVA sheet thickness to ensure adequate protection.
SN - 0970-4388
SN - 1998-3905
ER -