Quantifying sprint force-velocity elasticity: implications for individualized training decisions
- 1Beijing Polytechnic College
Abstract
This study aimed to (1) develop an elasticity framework for the sprint force-velocity (F-V) relationship and (2) examine how maximal force (F_{0}), maximal velocity (v_{0}), and sprint distance modulate the four derived elasticity metrics, and (3) explore these elasticity metrics' interrelation. After modelling the F-V relationship differential equation, four elasticity metrics were defined as force elasticity (F_{e}), the elasticity of sprint time to F_{0}; velocity elasticity (v_{e}), the elasticity of sprint time to v_{0}; the force-velocity elasticity norm {(\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{EN}}=\sqrt{F_{e}^{2}+v_{e}^{2}}), capturing the combined sprint time sensitivity to proportional changes in F_{0} and v_{0}; and the force-velocity elasticity ratio {(\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{ER}}=F_{e}{\div v}_{e}), indicating which variable dominates the sprint time response. Model simulations showed that F_{e} decreased with rising F_{0} and increased with rising v_{0}, while v_{e} showed the opposite pattern. With increasing sprint distance, F_{e} decreased and v_{e} increased. Given its negligible effect on sprint time, ignoring air resistance yields a conservation law (2F_{e}+v_{e}\equiv 1), indicating that a gain in one elasticity metric necessarily diminishes the other in a fixed proportion. This framework also identifies a valley distance (d_{valley}) at {\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{ER}}=2, where {\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{EN}} is minimized (\sqrt{0.2}) and sprint time is least responsive to changes in F-V relationship variables. Empirical data confirmed that the two theoretical laws still hold approximately when air resistance is considered. By linking changes in F_{0} and v_{0} to sprint time across different distances, the elasticity framework provides a quantitative basis for estimating the theoretical sprint time response to documented changes in F-V relationship variables.
Related
- Beyond Imbalance: An Elasticity Framework for the Distance-averaged Force-Velocity Relationship in Vertical Jump
- Discrete Backbone Elasticity and Curvature-Dependent Torsion Statistics in Proteins
- Comprehensive lineage tracing maps the landscape of cell fate decisions in mouse embryogenesis
- Dynamic Landscape Analysis of cell fate decisions provides predictive models of neural development from single-cell data
- Detecting and Quantifying Variability in Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics Datasets
BibTeX
@misc{li2026quantifying,
title = {{Quantifying sprint force-velocity elasticity: implications for individualized training decisions}},
author = {Z. Li and J. Yan and X. Zhang and Z. Chen and Q. Li and P. Jimenez-Reyes and D. Janicijevic and A. garcia-ramos},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.64898/2026.08.29.748040},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.29.748040v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Quantifying sprint force-velocity elasticity: implications for individualized training decisions
AU - Z. Li
AU - J. Yan
AU - X. Zhang
AU - Z. Chen
AU - Q. Li
AU - P. Jimenez-Reyes
AU - D. Janicijevic
AU - A. garcia-ramos
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/29
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.08.29.748040
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.29.748040v1
AB - This study aimed to (1) develop an elasticity framework for the sprint force-velocity (F-V) relationship and (2) examine how maximal force (F_{0}), maximal velocity (v_{0}), and sprint distance modulate the four derived elasticity metrics, and (3) explore these elasticity metrics' interrelation. After modelling the F-V relationship differential equation, four elasticity metrics were defined as force elasticity (F_{e}), the elasticity of sprint time to F_{0}; velocity elasticity (v_{e}), the elasticity of sprint time to v_{0}; the force-velocity elasticity norm {(\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{EN}}=\sqrt{F_{e}^{2}+v_{e}^{2}}), capturing the combined sprint time sensitivity to proportional changes in F_{0} and v_{0}; and the force-velocity elasticity ratio {(\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{ER}}=F_{e}{\div v}_{e}), indicating which variable dominates the sprint time response. Model simulations showed that F_{e} decreased with rising F_{0} and increased with rising v_{0}, while v_{e} showed the opposite pattern. With increasing sprint distance, F_{e} decreased and v_{e} increased. Given its negligible effect on sprint time, ignoring air resistance yields a conservation law (2F_{e}+v_{e}\equiv 1), indicating that a gain in one elasticity metric necessarily diminishes the other in a fixed proportion. This framework also identifies a valley distance (d_{valley}) at {\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{ER}}=2, where {\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{EN}} is minimized (\sqrt{0.2}) and sprint time is least responsive to changes in F-V relationship variables. Empirical data confirmed that the two theoretical laws still hold approximately when air resistance is considered. By linking changes in F_{0} and v_{0} to sprint time across different distances, the elasticity framework provides a quantitative basis for estimating the theoretical sprint time response to documented changes in F-V relationship variables.
ER -