Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,631 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCbioRxiv

Beyond Imbalance: An Elasticity Framework for the Distance-averaged Force-Velocity Relationship in Vertical Jump

  1. 1Beijing Polytechnic College

Abstract

This study aimed to (1) establish the distance-averaged F-V relationship framework and (2) develop elasticity metrics that quantify how F-V relationship variables govern jump height and inform training prescription. Theoretical derivation and experimental validation across 108 F-V relationship models derived from 1578 jumps (countermovement jump and squat jump at three knee angles; 20 well-trained subjects) yielded a standard error of 2.1% and a nearly perfect correlation (r = 0.96, p < 0.001) between measured and predicted jump height. Four elasticity metrics were formulated: force elasticity (F_{e}), the elasticity of jump height to maximal force (F_{0}); velocity elasticity (v_{e}), the elasticity of jump height to maximal velocity (v_{0}); the force-velocity elasticity norm {(\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{EN}}=\sqrt{F_{e}^{2}+v_{e}^{2}}), reflecting the overall sensitivity of jump height to changes in F-V relationship variables; and the force-velocity elasticity ratio {(\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{ER}}=F_{e}{\div v}_{e}), indicating which variable dominates the jump height response. Simulations and experiments revealed that F_{e} bore an inverse relationship to F_{0}, and v_{e} was inversely related to v_{0}, reflecting diminishing marginal returns. At a fixed jump height, simulations showed {\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{EN}} and {\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{ER}} displayed a U-shaped relationship; a balanced profile ({\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{ER}}=1) did not always correspond to the lowest {\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{EN}}. The distance-averaged F-V elasticity framework offers a physically grounded and quantitative tool for linking F-V relationship variables directly to jump performance, providing a basis for informing individualized training decisions.

Related

  1. HOTAIR regulates osteogenic–adipogenic differentiation imbalance through the miR-217/DKK1-mediated Wnt/β-catenin pathway in SONFH-BMSCs
    Min Yi, Feifei Lin, Zhenwu Du +1
    Frontiers in geneticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biochemistryEurope PMC
  2. Discrete Backbone Elasticity and Curvature-Dependent Torsion Statistics in Proteins
    Yiquan Wang, Mingyu Bian, Jiayuan Ma
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textBiophysicsPhysical chemistryarXiv
  3. Quantifying sprint force-velocity elasticity: implications for individualized training decisions
    Z. Li, J. Yan, X. Zhang +5
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textBiophysicsbioRxiv
  4. Dietary selenium deficiency drives sex-specific circadian disturbance through redox imbalance and causes early systolic dysfunction in mice
    X. Guo, F. Lambregtse, L. Geerlings +8
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationbioRxiv
  5. The aging secretome as a candidate driver of bone remodeling imbalance: myokines, adipokines, and senescence-associated secretory factors
    Hanhong Fang, Xianglong Zhou, Yang Liu +5
    Frontiers in EndocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Molecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{li2026beyond,
  title = {{Beyond Imbalance: An Elasticity Framework for the Distance-averaged Force-Velocity Relationship in Vertical Jump}},
  author = {Z. Li and M. Li and X. Zhang and Z. Chen and L. Yang and Q. Li},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.01.748530},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.01.748530v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Beyond Imbalance: An Elasticity Framework for the Distance-averaged Force-Velocity Relationship in Vertical Jump
AU  - Z. Li
AU  - M. Li
AU  - X. Zhang
AU  - Z. Chen
AU  - L. Yang
AU  - Q. Li
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.01.748530
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.01.748530v1
AB  - This study aimed to (1) establish the distance-averaged F-V relationship framework and (2) develop elasticity metrics that quantify how F-V relationship variables govern jump height and inform training prescription. Theoretical derivation and experimental validation across 108 F-V relationship models derived from 1578 jumps (countermovement jump and squat jump at three knee angles; 20 well-trained subjects) yielded a standard error of 2.1% and a nearly perfect correlation (r = 0.96, p < 0.001) between measured and predicted jump height. Four elasticity metrics were formulated: force elasticity (F_{e}), the elasticity of jump height to maximal force (F_{0}); velocity elasticity (v_{e}), the elasticity of jump height to maximal velocity (v_{0}); the force-velocity elasticity norm {(\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{EN}}=\sqrt{F_{e}^{2}+v_{e}^{2}}), reflecting the overall sensitivity of jump height to changes in F-V relationship variables; and the force-velocity elasticity ratio {(\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{ER}}=F_{e}{\div v}_{e}), indicating which variable dominates the jump height response. Simulations and experiments revealed that F_{e} bore an inverse relationship to F_{0}, and v_{e} was inversely related to v_{0}, reflecting diminishing marginal returns. At a fixed jump height, simulations showed {\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{EN}} and {\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{ER}} displayed a U-shaped relationship; a balanced profile ({\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{ER}}=1) did not always correspond to the lowest {\mathrm{F}-\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{EN}}. The distance-averaged F-V elasticity framework offers a physically grounded and quantitative tool for linking F-V relationship variables directly to jump performance, providing a basis for informing individualized training decisions.
ER  -