Rethinking Health Care Regulatory Sandboxes Under the European Union AI Act.
- 1Escuela Superior de Ingeniería y Tecnología (ESIT), Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, Avenida de la Paz, 137, Logroño, 26006, Spain.
- 2AIR Institute (Fundación Instituto de Investigación Internacional en Inteligencia Artificial y Ciencias de la Computación), Av. Santiago Madrigal, 39, Salamanca, 37003, Spain.
Abstract
Unlabelled
AI models have enabled substantial advances in health care. Since the entry into force of the European Union (EU) AI Act in 2024, these systems have become subject to a common regulatory framework in the EU intended to harmonize AI governance across all member states. One of the act's distinctive features is that it accommodates existing economic, technological, and regulatory differences among European countries by leaving certain implementation responsibilities to national authorities. This is evident in regulatory sandboxes, supervised environments for developing, testing, and validating AI systems before deployment. In this viewpoint, we provide a policy-oriented analysis of health care regulatory sandboxes under the EU AI Act and propose recommendations for their design. These recommendations address the need to document model compression techniques that may affect the classification of large high-risk systems above the 10²⁵ floating point operations per second threshold, incorporate explainability into AI systems from the design stage, identify and document biases in health care datasets, clarify the treatment of federated learning parameter updates under the General Data Protection Regulation, and strengthen the oversight of AI agents in clinical environments. The implementation timeline makes this discussion particularly timely given the approaching deadline of August 2, 2027, by which all member states must have established at least one national regulatory sandbox.
Related
- Academic treatment optimization studies in oncology and internal medicine: a risk- and burden-adapted regulatory framework for the European Union.
- The ethical and regulatory framework of medical artificial intelligence (AI) system’s behavioral performance for image-based diagnostics: An ethical evaluation of the International and European Union Scope
- Multifaceted dynamics of health expenditure in the European Union: macroeconomic, environmental, social and medical determinants
- Climate risk or healthcare investment? Explaining oral health outcomes across European Union member states
- Inequalities in self-rated health across European Union countries: a Simple-Means MAIHDA demonstration using the European Social Survey
BibTeX
@article{ceballos2026rethinking,
title = {{Rethinking Health Care Regulatory Sandboxes Under the European Union AI Act.}},
author = {María Flores Ceballos and Fernando Cagigas Villar and Alberto López Tejerina},
journal = {JMIR AI},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.2196/98653},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42962072},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Rethinking Health Care Regulatory Sandboxes Under the European Union AI Act.
AU - María Flores Ceballos
AU - Fernando Cagigas Villar
AU - Alberto López Tejerina
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - JMIR AI
DO - 10.2196/98653
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42962072
AB - Unlabelled AI models have enabled substantial advances in health care. Since the entry into force of the European Union (EU) AI Act in 2024, these systems have become subject to a common regulatory framework in the EU intended to harmonize AI governance across all member states. One of the act's distinctive features is that it accommodates existing economic, technological, and regulatory differences among European countries by leaving certain implementation responsibilities to national authorities. This is evident in regulatory sandboxes, supervised environments for developing, testing, and validating AI systems before deployment. In this viewpoint, we provide a policy-oriented analysis of health care regulatory sandboxes under the EU AI Act and propose recommendations for their design. These recommendations address the need to document model compression techniques that may affect the classification of large high-risk systems above the 10²⁵ floating point operations per second threshold, incorporate explainability into AI systems from the design stage, identify and document biases in health care datasets, clarify the treatment of federated learning parameter updates under the General Data Protection Regulation, and strengthen the oversight of AI agents in clinical environments. The implementation timeline makes this discussion particularly timely given the approaching deadline of August 2, 2027, by which all member states must have established at least one national regulatory sandbox.
SN - 2817-1705
ER -