Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in public health

Climate risk or healthcare investment? Explaining oral health outcomes across European Union member states

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Oral Pathology, Multidisciplinary Center for Research, Evaluation, Diagnosis and Therapies in Oral Medicine, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara , ,
  2. 2Department of Organization, Professional Legislation and Management of the Dental Office, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy , ,
  3. 3Finance, Business Information Systems and Modeling Department, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timisoara , ,
  4. 4Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Victor Babes”, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara , ,

Abstract

Introduction: Climate change is a major public-health concern, but short-term population-level evidence linking annual climate variability to oral-health outcomes remains limited. This study evaluates within-country associations between temperature, extreme heat days, and three oral-health indicators across EU member states.

Methods: A longitudinal ecological panel analysis was conducted for the 27 EU member states from 2016 to 2023. Daily temperatures at each country centroid were obtained from the Open-Meteo Historical Weather API and aggregated to annual mean temperature and days with maximum temperature above 30 °C. Outcomes were GBD 2023 carries and periodontal prevalence and Eurostat unmet dental care. Two-way fixed-effects models used country-clustered finite-sample-corrected standard errors and 999-replication wild-cluster bootstrap p -values.

Results: Neither mean annual temperature nor extreme heat days were associated with any outcome in the two-way fixed-effects models. Within R-squared values were 0.056 for caries, 0.032 for periodontal disease, and 0.044 for unmet dental care. Wild-cluster bootstrap inference confirmed the absence of associations at the 5% level. Quadratic temperature terms and climate-by-expenditure interactions were also non-significant.

Conclusion: Over the eight-year study period, short-term within-country variation in the reconstructed climate indicators was not associated with the examined oral-health outcomes. Nonlinear and expenditure-interaction models were also null. Longer panels, spatially resolved exposure measures, and oral-health-specific financing, coverage, and utilization indicators are needed.

Related

  1. Adolescent Mental Healthcare as a Public Utility: A Multi-Sectoral Economic Case for Proactive Investment
    Mackenzie Swirbul, Emily Peake, Anne Bischops +3
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  2. From scattered data to actionable knowledge: European Climate and Health Observatory
    A Kazmierczak
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyPMCEurope PMC
  3. Climate and health capacity building for climate-resilient health systems: a case study of the ASPHER-GCCHE European course
    Eric P Twomey, Danielly de P Magalhães, Chiara Cadeddu +7
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyPMC
  4. Warming world, informed care: Piloting a script to guide climate conversations in healthcare.
    Charles E Moore, La Kesha Y Lawrence, Kathryn Thier
    The journal of climate change and healthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
  5. HIV‐related knowledge and stigma among healthcare workers in Greece: A secondary analysis of a European survey
    Charalampos D. Moschopoulos, Nikos Pantazis, Konstantinos Protopapas +5
    HIV MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textInfectious diseasePMC
BibTeX
@article{lupita2026climate,
  title = {{Climate risk or healthcare investment? Explaining oral health outcomes across European Union member states}},
  author = {Cassandra Lupita and Anca-Cristina Perpelea and Laura-Cristina Rusu and Iulia Muntean and Edida Maghet and Oana Ramona Lobonț and Magda-Mihaela Luca},
  journal = {Frontiers in public health},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1939057},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13661443},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Climate risk or healthcare investment? Explaining oral health outcomes across European Union member states
AU  - Cassandra Lupita
AU  - Anca-Cristina Perpelea
AU  - Laura-Cristina Rusu
AU  - Iulia Muntean
AU  - Edida Maghet
AU  - Oana Ramona Lobonț
AU  - Magda-Mihaela Luca
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Frontiers in public health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1939057
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13661443
AB  - Introduction: Climate change is a major public-health concern, but short-term population-level evidence linking annual climate variability to oral-health outcomes remains limited. This study evaluates within-country associations between temperature, extreme heat days, and three oral-health indicators across EU member states.  Methods: A longitudinal ecological panel analysis was conducted for the 27 EU member states from 2016 to 2023. Daily temperatures at each country centroid were obtained from the Open-Meteo Historical Weather API and aggregated to annual mean temperature and days with maximum temperature above 30 °C. Outcomes were GBD 2023 carries and periodontal prevalence and Eurostat unmet dental care. Two-way fixed-effects models used country-clustered finite-sample-corrected standard errors and 999-replication wild-cluster bootstrap p -values.  Results: Neither mean annual temperature nor extreme heat days were associated with any outcome in the two-way fixed-effects models. Within R-squared values were 0.056 for caries, 0.032 for periodontal disease, and 0.044 for unmet dental care. Wild-cluster bootstrap inference confirmed the absence of associations at the 5% level. Quadratic temperature terms and climate-by-expenditure interactions were also non-significant.  Conclusion: Over the eight-year study period, short-term within-country variation in the reconstructed climate indicators was not associated with the examined oral-health outcomes. Nonlinear and expenditure-interaction models were also null. Longer panels, spatially resolved exposure measures, and oral-health-specific financing, coverage, and utilization indicators are needed.
SN  - 2296-2565
ER  -