Governance, coordination, and accountability in public health emergency preparedness and response: A scoping review
- 1Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Abstract
Public health emergency preparedness depends not only on technical capacity but also on strong governance, coordinated multisector action, and clear accountability. However, evidence on how these systems function across different contexts remains fragmented. This scoping review synthesized global evidence on governance structures, coordination mechanisms, and accountability frameworks in public health emergency preparedness and response. Peer-reviewed and grey literature published between 2000 and 2025 was systematically searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL, as well as organizational and institutional websites. Eligible sources addressing governance, coordination, or accountability were charted and thematically analyzed to map institutional arrangements, coordination practices, and accountability systems. Seventy-seven sources met the inclusion criteria, comprising 67 primary studies and 10 grey-literature documents. Most studies were published after 2010, with strong representation from global, Asian, and African contexts. The evidence included conceptual and theoretical work, empirical studies, reviews and framework analyses, and policy-oriented guidance. Four interlinked themes emerged: governance architecture, legal foundations, and the distribution of authority, including centralized and decentralized arrangements; institutional roles and coordination mechanisms; accountability failures and system fragmentation; and reform approaches and enabling conditions. Clear legal mandates, functional intersectoral coordination bodies, and routine performance reviews were reported alongside stronger preparedness, whereas weak accountability, overlapping mandates, fragmented information systems, and political inertia were reported alongside delayed and poorly coordinated responses. Effective public health emergency preparedness was described in the literature less in relation to resources alone than to the strength and integration of governance, coordination, and accountability systems. Stronger preparedness was reported alongside adaptive governance, institutionalized multisector coordination, transparent oversight, and continuous learning embedded in policy and practice.
Related
- Emergency preparedness knowledge and training needs among community volunteers in Shanghai, China, during the 2022 COVID-19 response: a cross-sectional questionnaire study
- Integrating emergency medical services and hospital surge capacity for mass-gathering preparedness: a structured narrative review
- The Central African Republic – A fragile centre: Emergency preparedness through national, regional and One Health approaches
- Simulation-based evaluation of emergency medicine residents' preparedness for toxic terrorism.
- From connectivity to coordination: a four-party evolutionary game analysis of telemedicine governance for chronic disease management in China
BibTeX
@article{sasie2026governance,
title = {{Governance, coordination, and accountability in public health emergency preparedness and response: A scoping review}},
author = {Sileshi Demelash Sasie and Melkamu Asrat Alava and Lensa Fekadu and Haymanot Firdie and Neima Zeynu Ali and Tarekegn Solomon and Melkamu Abte Afele},
journal = {PLOS Global Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pgph.0006719},
url = {https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006719},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Governance, coordination, and accountability in public health emergency preparedness and response: A scoping review
AU - Sileshi Demelash Sasie
AU - Melkamu Asrat Alava
AU - Lensa Fekadu
AU - Haymanot Firdie
AU - Neima Zeynu Ali
AU - Tarekegn Solomon
AU - Melkamu Abte Afele
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/18
JO - PLOS Global Public Health
DO - 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006719
UR - https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006719
AB - Public health emergency preparedness depends not only on technical capacity but also on strong governance, coordinated multisector action, and clear accountability. However, evidence on how these systems function across different contexts remains fragmented. This scoping review synthesized global evidence on governance structures, coordination mechanisms, and accountability frameworks in public health emergency preparedness and response. Peer-reviewed and grey literature published between 2000 and 2025 was systematically searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL, as well as organizational and institutional websites. Eligible sources addressing governance, coordination, or accountability were charted and thematically analyzed to map institutional arrangements, coordination practices, and accountability systems. Seventy-seven sources met the inclusion criteria, comprising 67 primary studies and 10 grey-literature documents. Most studies were published after 2010, with strong representation from global, Asian, and African contexts. The evidence included conceptual and theoretical work, empirical studies, reviews and framework analyses, and policy-oriented guidance. Four interlinked themes emerged: governance architecture, legal foundations, and the distribution of authority, including centralized and decentralized arrangements; institutional roles and coordination mechanisms; accountability failures and system fragmentation; and reform approaches and enabling conditions. Clear legal mandates, functional intersectoral coordination bodies, and routine performance reviews were reported alongside stronger preparedness, whereas weak accountability, overlapping mandates, fragmented information systems, and political inertia were reported alongside delayed and poorly coordinated responses. Effective public health emergency preparedness was described in the literature less in relation to resources alone than to the strength and integration of governance, coordination, and accountability systems. Stronger preparedness was reported alongside adaptive governance, institutionalized multisector coordination, transparent oversight, and continuous learning embedded in policy and practice.
SN - 2767-3375
ER -