The Central African Republic – A fragile centre: Emergency preparedness through national, regional and One Health approaches
4 affiliations
- 1Global Actions for Public Health Services (GAPS), Yaoundé
- 2Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Yaoundé
- 3Independent Consultant, Geneva
- 4Ministry of Health and Population, Bangui
Abstract
The Central African Republic (CAR) faces persistent public health emergencies driven by constrained health systems capacity, recurrent outbreaks and its geographic position at the intersection of six high-risk countries. Cross-border mobility, ecological interconnectedness and limited multisectoral coordination amplify vulnerability to epidemics and pandemics. Strengthening emergency preparedness in CAR has implications beyond national borders, given its central role within a highly connected regional epidemiological landscape. A structured qualitative policy analysis was conducted using peer-reviewed and grey literature (2015–2025). The analysis followed a three-stage framework: problem definition, identification of policy options and comparative evaluation. Three policy pathways were assessed using five criteria: technical feasibility, political and institutional feasibility, financial sustainability, responsiveness to cross-border risks and alignment with One Health principles. Three policy pathways were identified: national system strengthening, regional integration and a hybrid One Health model. National approaches improve domestic capacity but are insufficient for transboundary risks. Regional approaches enhance coordination but depend on sustained institutional alignment. The hybrid model demonstrates the strongest overall performance by integrating national capacity, regional cooperation and multisectoral coordination. Emergency preparedness in CAR requires a shift from nationally bounded strategies to integrated regional and multisectoral systems. A hybrid One Health model provides the most feasible and sustainable pathway to strengthen outbreak detection, preparedness and response.
Related
- National Ebola preparedness policy architecture and health system readiness in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda: a scoping review anchored in the 2026 Bundibugyo outbreak
- One Health preparedness for Ebola disease caused by Bundibugyo virus: lessons from the 2026 outbreak centred in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
- Integrating emergency medical services and hospital surge capacity for mass-gathering preparedness: a structured narrative review
- Maternal critical care infrastructure and organisational preparedness in Türkiye: a national analysis of the MaCriCare cross-sectional survey
- Case Fatality of Leptospirosis in the Dominican Republic, 2012-2026: A 14-Year National Surveillance Analysis
BibTeX
@article{akoarrey2026central,
title = {{The Central African Republic – A fragile centre: Emergency preparedness through national, regional and One Health approaches}},
author = {Denis Ako-Arrey and Frankline Sevidzem Wirsiy and Bonaventure Bazirutwabo and Jean Méthode Moyen},
journal = {Journal of Public Health in Africa},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.4102/jphia.v17i1.1941},
url = {https://doi.org/10.4102/jphia.v17i1.1941},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - The Central African Republic – A fragile centre: Emergency preparedness through national, regional and One Health approaches
AU - Denis Ako-Arrey
AU - Frankline Sevidzem Wirsiy
AU - Bonaventure Bazirutwabo
AU - Jean Méthode Moyen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Journal of Public Health in Africa
DO - 10.4102/jphia.v17i1.1941
UR - https://doi.org/10.4102/jphia.v17i1.1941
AB - The Central African Republic (CAR) faces persistent public health emergencies driven by constrained health systems capacity, recurrent outbreaks and its geographic position at the intersection of six high-risk countries. Cross-border mobility, ecological interconnectedness and limited multisectoral coordination amplify vulnerability to epidemics and pandemics. Strengthening emergency preparedness in CAR has implications beyond national borders, given its central role within a highly connected regional epidemiological landscape. A structured qualitative policy analysis was conducted using peer-reviewed and grey literature (2015–2025). The analysis followed a three-stage framework: problem definition, identification of policy options and comparative evaluation. Three policy pathways were assessed using five criteria: technical feasibility, political and institutional feasibility, financial sustainability, responsiveness to cross-border risks and alignment with One Health principles. Three policy pathways were identified: national system strengthening, regional integration and a hybrid One Health model. National approaches improve domestic capacity but are insufficient for transboundary risks. Regional approaches enhance coordination but depend on sustained institutional alignment. The hybrid model demonstrates the strongest overall performance by integrating national capacity, regional cooperation and multisectoral coordination. Emergency preparedness in CAR requires a shift from nationally bounded strategies to integrated regional and multisectoral systems. A hybrid One Health model provides the most feasible and sustainable pathway to strengthen outbreak detection, preparedness and response.
SN - 2038-9922
SN - 2038-9930
ER -